Do the dems get to pick each date?He was being sarcastic, ekim. You're the only one too dumb to get it. Where's your link, chimp?
There is one that comes around every four years, around the same time. Originally Posted by wordup666
No, each side doesn't "pull the same crap". Republican lawmakers have never sponsored an organized boycott or publicly urged their members not to attend. Why do you trust Wordup? He doesn't provide a link for his number, nor does he say which inauguration(s) that number refers to. Here is a link wherein the Library of Congress researched the question and determined the only rough precedent was Nixon's second inauguration back in 1973 - when those boycotting were also Democrats.https://www.quora.com/Did-any-Republ...mate-president
http://time.com/4636736/inauguration-boycott-1973/ Originally Posted by lustylad
https://www.quora.com/Did-any-Republ...mate-presidentThe first two links don't say anything... wtf does Gov. Perry have to do with this? He was a Governor, not a US lawmaker.
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/co...ycotting-trump
http://www.sunherald.com/news/politi...127039424.html
Here are some links for you, the last shows about 100 lawmakers miss each inauguration.
Want me to rub your nose in it some more? Originally Posted by wordup666
From your third link:As each day passes it becomes increasingly obvious the Russians had nothing to do with HillaryNoMore's defeat! They can't read! How does one vote who can't read?
" ... the Senate Historical Office... had no record of a boycott comparable to that being proposed for Trump’s inauguration Friday." Originally Posted by lustylad
The first two links don't say anything... wtf does Gov. Perry have to do with this? He was a Governor, not a US lawmaker.
From your third link:
"About 100 lawmakers skip the presidential inauguration every four years, usually due to other commitments or responsibilities in their home states... the Senate Historical Office... had no record of a boycott comparable to that being proposed for Trump’s inauguration Friday."
Thanks for the backup on the number. Now please explain to Old-T that it encompasses BOTH parties, not just Republicans (who unlike the Dems have never promoted a formal inaugural boycott by its lawmakers). Originally Posted by lustylad
No republicans have boycotted any inauguration. There are about 100 lawmakers who miss it because of prior commitments. which seems like a lame excuse. Originally Posted by wordup666He being more astute than you probably got it the first time.
As each day passes it becomes increasingly obvious the Russians had nothing to do with HillaryNoMore's defeat! They can't read! How does one vote who can't read? Originally Posted by LexusLover
No republicans have boycotted any inauguration. There are about 100 lawmakers who miss it because of prior commitments. which seems like a lame excuse. Originally Posted by wordup666From #25 let me help you to the table little democrat.
As each day passes it becomes increasingly obvious the Russians had nothing to do with HillaryNoMore's defeat! They can't read! How does one vote who can't read? Originally Posted by LexusLover" How does one vote who can't read ? " Easy ! Those are what the dumbascraps refer to as " absentee " voters ! They usually reside in the cemeteries. Glad to help !
Will this thread last another 4 years while the Liberals on here "assign" motivation by innuendo and supposition as to why someone was not present?Mebbe they're like Ekim and assup and not negotiating for pussy, but " something " else that they usually get at the gloryholes !
Must be nice to be able to read minds ... when negotiating for pussy! Originally Posted by LexusLover