Bill O'Reilly

I wonder how much tail Bill pull off Fox?

Imho...the pendulum has swung too far in the women direction, in that they are never at fault.

Like the Duke lacrosse case where they shot first and asked questions and facts later Originally Posted by WTF

Everybody knows the rules now. Or at least they should.

If ORielly did what some of the women say, (which went way beyond calling someone a Blond), then he has his own self to blame.

I like how the Main Stream Media is saying that perhaps this is a move by Fox toward a less conservative bent on their overall programming.

Really. Tucker Carlson is a hell of a lot more criticle of the Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Democrat agenda than Bill ever was. And he is followed by Hannity, who is just to the right of Attila the Hun.

They both occupy the desirable prime time spots on week nights.

Everybody knows the rules now. Or at least they should.

If ORielly did what some of the women say, (which went way beyond calling someone a Blond), then he has his own self to blame.

I like how the Main Stream Media is saying that perhaps this is a move by Fox toward a less conservative bent on their overall programming.

Really. Tucker Carlson is a hell of a lot more criticle of the Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Democrat agenda than Bill ever was. And he is followed by Hannity, who is just to the right of Attila the Hun.

They both occupy the desirable prime time spots on week nights. Originally Posted by Jackie S

RIGHT R.M.T

I wonder how much tail Bill pull off Fox?

Imho...the pendulum has swung too far in the women direction, in that they are never at fault.

Like the Duke lacrosse case where they shot first and asked questions and facts later Originally Posted by WTF

They ended up with egg on their faces in that instance. I'm not a fan of sexual harassment and fire anyone at my shop who actually harasses my female employees, but I hire ugly ones to discourage the practice.

Women gained the upper hand when polygamy was outlawed - we should bring that back so rich, older white guys can rule the roost like in the good ole' days.

Everybody knows the rules now. Or at least they should.

If ORielly did what some of the women say, (which went way beyond calling someone a Blond), then he has his own self to blame.

I like how the Main Stream Media is saying that perhaps this is a move by Fox toward a less conservative bent on their overall programming.

Really. Tucker Carlson is a hell of a lot more criticle of the Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Democrat agenda than Bill ever was. And he is followed by Hannity, who is just to the right of Attila the Hun.

They both occupy the desirable prime time spots on week nights. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Attila the Hun was not a right winger - that is a liberal hatchet job on conservatives just by calling him a right winger.

Everybody knows the rules now. Or at least they should.

If ORielly did what some of the women say, (which went way beyond calling someone a Blond), then he has his own self to blame.

I like how the Main Stream Media is saying that perhaps this is a move by Fox toward a less conservative bent on their overall programming.

Really. Tucker Carlson is a hell of a lot more criticle of the Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Democrat agenda than Bill ever was. And he is followed by Hannity, who is just to the right of Attila the Hun.

They both occupy the desirable prime time spots on week nights. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Jackie...I'm still not sure wtf the rules are or if they are even close to fair.

Women can come on to men but not the opposite?

That is like saying we all know prostitution is against the law....yes but the bigger picture is should it be?

When two people get drunk , why is it the man's responsibility not to fuck?

You sounding like those liberals you rail against. Maybe you think we should revisit Judge Clarence Thomas?



.

Attila the Hun was not a right winger - that is a liberal hatchet job on conservatives just by calling him a right winger. Originally Posted by DSK

It was just a phrase. I assume most have heard it and understand the meaning.

I don't care much for Hannity, but I like the Show's Format.

The first woman to accuse O'REILLY of sexual harassment was Andrea Mackris. She sued him for $60 million back in 2004 and settled out of court for $9 million. As far as I can tell, Bill never groped her or did anything physical. He took her out to dinner multiple times and talked about dildos, masturbation and phone sex. Then he called her and talked dirty while masturbating. She taped the call as evidence.

I'm not defending O'Reilly's behavior, but what the fuck! $9 million? This woman hit the fucking lottery! She worked less than 3 years at FOX as a "producer" earning $65k a year! Now she's set up for life! Is there a single degenerate on this board who wouldn't listen to a perv's dirty talk for that kind of payout? And the fucking lawyers get 1/3 just for filing the papers and overseeing the extortion process!

As a society, we are totally fucked up in allowing the fucking tort lawyers to run wild like this. Compare what Andrea Mackris put up with at FOX to our vets who come back from Iraq and Afghanistan with their legs blown off (and whatever you think about O'Reilly's private behavior, he raised a lot of money for Wounded Warriors). None of them feel entitled to $9 million. This is totally fucked up. Every time I see these phony tort lawyers bragging about how they are leading the fight against injustice it makes me throw up!

Shit I mostly agree with that Syrian mustard gas baby loving lustylady....except for the part about lusty wanting to listen to O'Reilly jackoff via phone. That is some gay ass shit there loverboy!


.

Yeah, it's the lawyer's fault.

LMAO!

Yeah, it's the lawyer's fault.

LMAO! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yea...I didn't agree with that part either. Lawyer is trying to make a buck! Not sure why lusty has a problem with that....if he loses, he does not get paid.

In this case...it was the consumer who actually voted. Companies pulled their ads because of market pressure, or perceived pressure.

It is all about perception. .. shit I hardly even pay for sex in Houston. ..they equate everything to sex trafficking. Who wants to be accused of that?

So Jackie is more right....this present day atmosphere is dangerous to try and get your weewee sucked!


.


.

Yeah, it's the lawyer's fault.

LMAO! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

As usual, oinkboy, you add NOTHING to the discussion!

It's O'Reilly's fault that there was any basis for a lawsuit at all. It's the lawyers' fault that any victim - real or fake - can see this as a lottery ticket. Work 3 years, file for sexual harassment, collect $9 million. Nice incentive structure there!

And then we have to listen to all those disgusting lawyers pretend they are driven by workplace justice rather than unbridled greed!

And then we have to listen to all those disgusting lawyers pretend they are driven by workplace justice rather than unbridled greed! Originally Posted by lustylad

No difference than pretending to be mad about gassed babies...fire off some bottle rockets for political gain, like Trump gives a fuck!

Jackie was right about Bill not adapting to the way things have changed. Kinda like the great grandfather still using the n word.

I do think the pendulum has swung too far to get convicted without a trial

Lawyer is trying to make a buck! Not sure why lusty has a problem with that... Originally Posted by WTF

Bullshit! How many hours do you think Andrea Mackris' lawyer worked on her case? It was settled less than 3 weeks after the complaint was filed. Let's be generous and say 200 hours... for that the lawyer received 1/3 of $9 million = $3 million. That works out to $15,000 an hour!

Oh yeah, just trying to make a buck!

We badly need tort reform in this country to stop these fucking leeches, who produce nothing, from feeding on the productive sectors of the economy.

Bullshit! How many hours do you think Andrea Mackris' lawyer worked on her case? It was settled less than 3 weeks after the complaint was filed. Let's be generous and say 200 hours... for that the lawyer received 1/3 of $9 million = $3 million. That works out to $15,000 an hour!

Oh yeah, just trying to make a buck!

We badly need tort reform in this country to stop these fucking leeches, who produce nothing, from feeding on the productive sectors of the economy. Originally Posted by lustylad

You sound like the United CEO..."Beat the shit out of that Chinaman and throw him off the plane!" "He can't sue us!"

No difference than pretending to be mad about gassed babies...fire off some bottle rockets for political gain, like Trump gives a fuck! Originally Posted by WTF

Idiot! You contradict yourself from one post to the next.

First, you say lawyers are just trying to make a buck. Then you agree with me that they're motivated by unbridled greed!

This is why only fools try to "debate" you.