25 year-old female arrested on same charges hildebeest was guilty of violating

lustylad's Avatar
Do you just close your eyes and put everything into your partisan view points? Get off the political slant for a second. Think about the fact that the Russian president tried and most likely did slant the election.

I'm not saying trump worked with them. I'm saying they did it and probably altered the vote. Yes we still have trump he is the president. But I believe less he actually won now. It's something we have to fight we can't let it go just cus you like the guy they picked for us. Originally Posted by Trey
You still haven't thought it all through, Trey...

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2070001
I would not fuck Chelsea before or after. Once a dude always a dude.

My guess is my right leaning friends would like to fuck Private Manning both before and after. What is yalls obsession with prison rape?. Is it some unfulfilled fantasy?


Funny how many are so selective on which leaks they like and hate... Originally Posted by WTF
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-06-2017, 01:59 PM
I would not fuck Chelsea before or after. Once a dude always a dude. Originally Posted by tonyvicksa
It is ok....we do not judge here in the eccie political forum
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-06-2017, 02:28 PM
This bitch is a Bernie Sanders minion. She's in for a real lesson on socialism living in a gray bar cell the same size and shape as her neighbors' while sharing exactly the same meals three times per day, and sharing shower facilities and toilets with them as well. Hope they put the TV on FOX News 24/7 for her. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Judge Nap seems to think she did the country a service....maybe she can watch that on Fox News.


http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/06/0...ussian-hacking


.
I have still not heard a reasonable explanation WHY Putin cares who our president is. It would be one thing if a candidate said they would destroy Russia or their allies. But from the Russian point of view I see very little difference between Clinton and Trump. Certainly not enough to warrant intervention in the election.

Think about the fact that the Russian president tried and most likely did slant the election. Originally Posted by Trey
But it is in this case.

One does not have to be a lie for the other to be the truth. Originally Posted by WTF
I wonder when this young lady will figure out how much shit she has stepped in.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-06-2017, 02:43 PM
I have still not heard a reasonable explanation WHY Putin cares who our president is. It would be one thing if a candidate said they would destroy Russia or their allies. But from the Russian point of view I see very little difference between Clinton and Trump. Certainly not enough to warrant intervention in the election. Originally Posted by tonyvicksa
Think how much Russia depends on oil. It is almost the whole of their economy.

Who would you rather see as our President, someone who embraces green technology or Trump?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-06-2017, 02:45 PM
I wonder when this young lady will figure out how much shit she has stepped in. Originally Posted by Jackie S
The paper basically gave the government the tools to track her...she should have sent it to the NYT.

What do you think about Judge Nap's analysis?

What do you think about Judge Nap's analysis? Originally Posted by WTF
I think he is dead on. How in the hell did our NSA miss Russian Hackers being able to gain access to County Clerk's Election computers, that would allow them to place "cookies" onto the sight that if clicked on, would allow the Hackers to actually change votes.

This is big news.

Of course, they will now have to determine if any votes were actually changed, and if so, for which Candidate.

And if the NSA or FBI knew about this BEFORE the election, why the fuck didn't they say something?
Trey's Avatar
  • Trey
  • 06-06-2017, 03:56 PM
I have still not heard a reasonable explanation WHY Putin cares who our president is. It would be one thing if a candidate said they would destroy Russia or their allies. But from the Russian point of view I see very little difference between Clinton and Trump. Certainly not enough to warrant intervention in the election. Originally Posted by tonyvicksa
From the Russian point if view. I see a guy that will destabilize the relationships America has. A guy that does not know what he is doing. A guy that will in no way what so ever bring the country together only further apart. That's just great, if I'm Russian.
I B Hankering's Avatar
I have still not heard a reasonable explanation WHY Putin cares who our president is. It would be one thing if a candidate said they would destroy Russia or their allies. But from the Russian point of view I see very little difference between Clinton and Trump. Certainly not enough to warrant intervention in the election. Originally Posted by tonyvicksa
Putin made it clear, at the time, that he thought Odumbo and hildebeest fucked with his election; so, he paid them back in spades: karma.




The paper basically gave the government the tools to track her...she should have sent it to the NYT.

What do you think about Judge Nap's analysis? Originally Posted by WTF
I jumped to that same conclusion when I first read what it was she released to the press. I knew that was going to be big time news yesterday, but she still broke the law.




I think he is dead on. How in the hell did our NSA miss Russian Hackers being able to gain access to County Clerk's Election computers, that would allow them to place "cookies" onto the sight that if clicked on, would allow the Hackers to actually change votes.

This is big news.

Of course, they will now have to determine if any votes were actually changed, and if so, for which Candidate.

And if the NSA or FBI knew about this BEFORE the election, why the fuck didn't they say something? Originally Posted by Jackie S
Exactly! They cover their asses and lie when they fuck up big time.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-06-2017, 04:47 PM

And if the NSA or FBI knew about this BEFORE the election, why the fuck didn't they say something? Originally Posted by Jackie S
IMHO...somebody leaked this to Trump before the election. Even he thought he was going to lose and was laying the groundwork for blame and to alread start restoring his brand. Then the bastard won!
IMHO...somebody leaked this to Trump before the election. Even he thought he was going to lose and was laying the groundwork for blame and to alread start restoring his brand. Then the bastard won! Originally Posted by WTF
There is always the possibility that the person biggest surprised on that Tuesday Night was President Trump.
lustylad's Avatar
Think how much Russia depends on oil. It is almost the whole of their economy.

Who would you rather see as our President, someone who embraces green technology or Trump? Originally Posted by WTF
More superficial "analysis" from WTFagboy's simple-minded simpleton school of foreign policy.

The West is still highly dependent on oil & gas for its energy, and will remain so for the medium-term future despite any forseeable advances in "green technology". A US President like Trump, whose goal is keeping global oil supplies plentiful, is inimical to Russia's desire for higher oil prices.

Another swing and a miss for you, fagboy!