More Liars than Reviewers - Page 3

I only trust myself and sometimes I do not even trust me or whoever I am.

I have seen and reviewed this provider. Being that she was my first...I, at the time felt it would be in bad taste to bash her in my very first review. However, had I known then what I know now....

..What's done is done, and feel no need to go into details, but my recomendation would have been a NO! Or I may not have even writen a review. Live and learn, I guess.

I really don't care enough to dig through and look, but I'd be willing to bet that a mojority of her positive reviews come from fairly new inexperience hobbiests, like I was. Originally Posted by Clopchep

Too bad your first time wasn't back in '07, could have got the same thing for a quarter of half dollar.

This is probably a bit off the subject but I wonder how much of a guys experience is based on his appearance and demeanor toward the girl.

If you've got garlic breath should you really expect DFK or if you've been sitting in a hot car all day with sweaty balls, how great should you expect the BBBJ to be.

If you play rough and she's not into that then how much fun will the FS be?

I know this doesn't account for flabby titties or a FUPA but just food for thought.

This is probably a bit off the subject but I wonder how much of a guys experience is based on his appearance and demeanor toward the girl.

If you've got garlic breath should you really expect DFK or if you've been sitting in a hot car all day with sweaty balls, how great should you expect the BBBJ to be.

If you play rough and she's not into that then how much fun will the FS be?

I know this doesn't account for flabby titties or a FUPA but just food for thought. Originally Posted by hughjass69

Her smoking like a coal fired locomotive, smelling like last weeks catch of the day, and Logans cheese adventure has nothing to do with our hygene or attitude.

I know of whom you speak and she got a bad case of GPS, nothing like paying for gold only to get aluminium.

I believe I have mentioned this before that we need to have a reviewers characteristics in the review. I am 300+ lbs, 50+ years old, white with average endowment. So if I have a good time, then other guys with my same stats MIGHT get the same service. Now if I see only reviews of a specific provider from guys who are young, well built and hung like a horse, I might not go to this provider as the old,ugly, fat farts like me did not have a great time and did not post any reviews. Just my 2 cents.

I get it to fellas. Your best bet is to read multiple reviews of the same provider. Read between the lines. Many hobbyist are simply nice guys who don't want to hurt the providers reps and/or feelings.
The biggest problem is - even though the providers aren't supposed to be able to read the ROS - they some how get to.
I'll be honest I don't ever say bad things but I try not to over emphasize if it is not great. I suppose if it were horrible - and I have had horrible prior to ECCIE when I used CL and BP. I also try to realize bang for the buck. If it is cheap then there is probably a reason.
Do your home work - If it is really bad - It will be noted somewhere. At least I hope it will. Also get a P411 account - better intel.
P411 is fairly easy to get if you see 3 verified P411 providers and they give you an OK.
Good post - Good responses.

This is probably a bit off the subject but I ... Originally Posted by hughjass69

Way off the subject as I understand it. The issue is dishonesty in the physical descriptions of providers rather than differences in attitude or performance.

Among the dishonesties that I have encountered in positive reviews are the following:

(1) A provider described as "25" years old who is actually over 50.
(2) A provider described as having a "25" inch waist who is actually pot-bellied and flabby.
(3) A provider described as having "nondistracting" tattoos who actually has several large and ugly tattoos.
(4) Multiple providers described as "30" or "2X" who are actually around 40.
(5) A provider described as having an "athletic build" who actually has a significant spare tire in her gut.
(6) Providers described as weighing "120" and "125" pounds who must weigh around 150 pounds.
(7) A provider described as weighing "130" pounds who must weigh closer to 160 pounds.
(8) A provider described as "slim" who has a 29-inch waist.
(9) A provider described as "young" and "27" years old who is actually 35-40 years old.
(10) A provider described as "slightly thicker" than her website photos who was significantly thicker and heavier than the photos on her website, which were, at that time, several years old.
(11) A provider described as having "one" tattoo who actually has three very notable large tattoos.
(12) A provider described as having "smooth skin" who has notable acne scars.
(13) Multiple providers described as having a "firm" and "toned" body who actually have a softer, average to below-average, body.

...

Among the dishonesties that I have encountered in positive reviews are the following:

(1) A provider described as "25" years old who is actually over 50.... Originally Posted by edm_fw

Age issues seem to be the number one lie not only in reviews but in advertisements. I'm sure this is added identity protection as well as polishing the apple but it's still misleading.

I guess as long as men have had sex, men have lied about it.

Good post.

There is a well known woman on ECCIE. She offers massage and L1/L2. Every reviewer says she is not BBW. If she is not a BBW (she has to be close to 250), then Rosie O'Donell is a Spinner.

One of the asian amps i attend, the girl had told me they had set up a fake account and a fake review in order to see rest of story. I am sure this goes on in the rest of the amps and across the whole providers circuit.

Did you ever think these reviews are being written because the chick is giving them some type of BBFS or BB GREEK and letting these guys cum in them? If the're really that bad, but get rave reviews, then somethings stinking in Denver. These chicks are doing services to get those rave reviews.

Did you ever think these reviews are being written because the chick is giving them some type of BBFS or BB GREEK and letting these guys cum in them? If the're really that bad, but get rave reviews, then somethings stinking in Denver. These chicks are doing services to get those rave reviews. Originally Posted by armydude

I think it is a bunch of things.

Possible BBFS, CIM, Greek etc.
Reduced rates or free services
Desperate guys who salivate at the sight of any woman, regardless of looks, weight etc.
Pimps posting reviews
All things being equal, a Provider with a good personality, and a good sense of humor will always get a better review

Even with all of these points, what drives me f**k**g crazy is the lack of honesty in the physical description and age. If someone is 5' 2" and weighs 200 pounds, SHE IS OBESE. Not curvy, not BBW, but flat out obese.

Did you ever think these reviews are being written because the chick is giving them some type of BBFS or BB GREEK and letting these guys cum in them? If the're really that bad, but get rave reviews, then somethings stinking in Denver. These chicks are doing services to get those rave reviews. Originally Posted by armydude

The BBQs are known for having this done for them.

I haven't been on the forum long, but early on I took my time to read the reviews and also compare the providers' showcases and ads. After a recent review of a lady was posted, I followed up to confirm her rates, availability and if she had any issues with race. All those things were no problem. The problem was she said she did not do BBBJ or doggie as posted in the review. So here we have a positive review with a claimed hot session and the lady denying some of the BCD activities which are fairly common by ECCIE standards. So I'm disappointed and a bit embarrassed after contacting her and she's left to likely get calls and emails from other hobbyists expecting the same thing. That sucks... or I guess... doesn't.