Trump is such a lunatic and narcissist

No one else has his tax returns , I am glad Mueller does .

Trump can not tell the truth very sad very sad indeed

Trump can not tell the truth very sad very sad indeed Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411

"scagmuncher69420 can not punctuate very sad very sad indeed"

Trump can not tell the truth very sad very sad indeed Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411

Name a Politician that can, lol.


Jim

.

I did not vote for Mrs. Clinton, but that's irrelevant.hildebeest was who millions of Americans voted against, Muy Loco, so historically she will never be "irrelevant" except for those of you on the left who are too embarrassed to admit that hildebeest was the dim-retard's choice for president.
I am worried about the misguided, unprincipled, and dangerous man who was elected.That's why millions of intelliegent people voted against hildebeest, Muy Loco. Pull up your big-boy britches, dumbos, and think about what's obvious. Who do you think kept hildebeest out of the White House, Muy Loco? It wasn't Putin. Putin, Medvedev and the relatively small number of oligarchs who are raping Russia and keeping the loot for themselves have billions to hide, invest and play shell games with. And they gave millions of those dollars to the Clintons, Muy Loco.The Russian people are getting plowed big-time as Putin and his pals grab as much as they can. hildebeest's cutesy little misspelled red-button sure put Putin in his place, didn't it, Muy Loco. Putin and his pals kill people who get in their way. It looks like you forget what hildebeest said, Muy Loco, "We came. We saw. He died." There are scum in different ports of call who are willing to help Putin and his pals hide and invest their loot.Some of it's hiding at the Clinton Foundation, and in Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's bank account, Muy Loco. Paul Manafort, it is proven, is one of those unethical assholes. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? He has created countless winding roads with bank accounts, investment accounts, and all told manner of financial tactics. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? At a minimum we know Manafort aids the immoral oligarchs. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? For a tidy sim, of course. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? Has Trump aided the oligarchs? What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? Hard to know, but his greed and desire for more and more money made him vulnerable. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? His track record of withholding payments to his businesses contractors indicates he acts unethically and then lies about it. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco? I'd say he looks suspicious.So does Podesta's connections with the Russians, Muy Loco. Plus he plays loose and fast with the facts all the time, even as President.What about hildebeest's 33,000 missing emails about yoga, Muy Loco? Manafort has a deep relationship with the immoral pirates in Russia. Have you never heard about hildebeest's relationships with George Soros, David Brock, Saul Alinsky, "Sid Vicious", Muy Loco? He helped run Trump's campaign. What about Podesta's connections with the Russians? Isn't it clear, even to dumbos, that there is ample reason to suspect unsavory and dangerous criminality is very possible with this bunch of unethical elitists who live in gold-plated opulence.Defines hildebeest to a "t", Muy Loco. We'll soon learn more, as it seems that Mueller has Trump's tax returns, and is looking into Trump's financial activities. We already learned that there are notes about the rendezvous between Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator and AG Lynch, Muy Loco. Why do you think Lynch's people had to redact those "notes" about their grandchildren, Muy Loco? Originally Posted by Muy Largo

Putin, Medvedev and the relatively small number of oligarchs... have billions to hide, invest and play shell games with... There are scum in different ports of call who are willing to help Putin and his pals hide and invest their loot. Paul Manafort, it is proven, is one of those unethical assholes. He has created countless winding roads with bank accounts, investment accounts, and all told manner of financial tactics. At a minimum we know Manafort aids the immoral oligarchs. For a tidy sim, of course... Manafort has a deep relationship with the immoral pirates in Russia. Originally Posted by Muy Largo

Ok, muy loco... tell us more. I'm all ears. I have no reason to defend Paul Manafort. You say all of the above is proven, not just allegations on your part. So how about showing us the proof? Did you find evidence of all this corruption in the famous Panama Papers? Then let's see it!

You do know that Manafort did PR/lobbying work for Ukraine, not Russia, right? You do know that this work was performed prior to Putin's 2014 Crimea invasion, at a time when Ukraine was flirting with the idea of joining the EU and trying to strengthen its ties to the West, right? You do know that the "dirt" on Manafort that the hildebeest campaign procured from Ukrainian agents in the Summer of 2016 (purporting to show he received millions in illegal payments from the previous government) turned out to be bogus and unsubstantiated, right?

I don't trust the guy, but I have yet to see any proof that he "aided the immoral oligarchs" in Russia or "created countless winding roads" to help them "hide their loot". Why would they use him anyway? He isn't even a banker.

But hey, you spit out all of this speculative bullshit - now back it up!

Manafort's money laundering?
Proof?
Easy. Read.
But don't read and reference the National Enquirer (Like your hero does) and don't believe what they tell you at FOX or Rush or dullbart. The information about Manafort's money laundering is there and many have already seen it. Go find it on own, if you dare to read journalists who might not be your political flavor because you'll label them libtards or fake news. Money laundering, however, isn't exactly what Mueller is interested in. At least not in the end. That is only a means to the end. It's what's going to guide the rest of it. Remember when Trump Junior said that during the financial crisis that haunted and was one legacy of Good Ole Shrub the Trump organization was doing nicely, thank-you and that Russian money was plentiful. Who in Russia has money? The altruistic book publisher or healthy food manufacturer? Do you read the Wall Street Journal? Foreign Affairs? The New Yorker? I'd also suggest the NY Times, but that would only incense you, if you already aren't incensed. Good night.

Why the fuck is Trump so worried about his tax information?
What is revealed through his taxes?
How long before we are learning specifics about Manafort's taxes?
How long before we learn even more details about the multiple offshore and obscure banking practices pursued by Mr. Manafort? Even more than the ugly stuff we already know (apparently only libtards understand this).
Though maybe there will be a war that happens first.
Wouldn't that be a unique distraction.

Manafort's money laundering?
Proof?
Easy. Read.
But don't read and reference the National Enquirer (Like your hero does) and don't believe what they tell you at FOX or Rush or dullbart. The information about Manafort's money laundering is there and many have already seen it. Go find it on own, if you dare to read journalists who might not be your political flavor because you'll label them libtards or fake news. Money laundering, however, isn't exactly what Mueller is interested in. At least not in the end. That is only a means to the end. It's what's going to guide the rest of it. Remember when Trump Junior said that during the financial crisis that haunted and was one legacy of Good Ole Shrub the Trump organization was doing nicely, thank-you and that Russian money was plentiful. Who in Russia has money? The altruistic book publisher or healthy food manufacturer? Do you read the Wall Street Journal? Foreign Affairs? The New Yorker? I'd also suggest the NY Times, but that would only incense you, if you already aren't incensed. Good night. Originally Posted by Muy Largo

you mean this NY Times ? or is there another one?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/u...ve-editor.html

NOV. 13, 2016
Continue reading the main story Share This Page

• Share
• Tweet
• Email
• More
• Save

When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.


After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office?


As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.


We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our readers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.
Sincerely,


Arthur Sulzberger Jr., publisher
Dean Baquet, executive editor


bahahaaaaa

Why the fuck is Trump so worried about his tax information?
What is revealed through his taxes?
How long before we are learning specifics about Manafort's taxes?
How long before we learn even more details about the multiple offshore and obscure banking practices pursued by Mr. Manafort? Even more than the ugly stuff we already know (apparently only libtards understand this).
Though maybe there will be a war that happens first.
Wouldn't that be a unique distraction. Originally Posted by Muy Largo

Because lying fucks like your handlers will take things out of context and exploit them for political advantage by spoon feeding you and your ilk a distortion you'll suck down like warm jiz, Muy Loco. BTW, Muy Loco, the New York Post, Forbes, Salon, etc., do not constitute the National Inquirer, Muy Loco, that you think they are says much about your lack of intelligence, Muy Loco.

Manafort's money laundering?
Proof?
Easy. Read... Go find it on own, if you dare to read journalists who might not be your political flavor... Do you read the Wall Street Journal? Foreign Affairs? The New Yorker? I'd also suggest the NY Times, but that would only incense you, if you already aren't incensed. Good night. Originally Posted by Muy Largo

Wow! Epic fail! I gave you the full benefit of a doubt, and you fell flat on your smirking, condescending face! You don't have a single link to a well-researched, corroborated, reputable story? All you can say is "go find it on (your) own"? How sad and pathetic you are! And a liar. You said you had proof that Manafort "aided the immoral oligarchs in Russia" - whatever the fuck that means. I asked to see it. You have nothing.

Btw asshole, I read every publication you pretend to read - and a whole lot more. What a fucking fraud you are!

How would you know, Junior?

You're still trying to impress your boi IBIdiot.

Yinz gon donton... pull your Butt Buddy EATLER out the dumpster.

STFU, oinkboy. Anytime anyone in this forum tries to raise the intellectual level of the discussion, you feel uncomfortable. You immediately jump up and drag everyone back into the gutter. That's your natural habitat. The only place where a slimy, filthy, disgusting pig like you feels at home. Now go suck another cock behind the dumpster, you fucking jagoff swineboy.

STFU, oinkboy. Anytime anyone in this forum tries to raise the intellectual level of the discussion, you feel uncomfortable. You immediately jump up and drag everyone back into the gutter. That's your natural habitat. . Originally Posted by lustylad

Did you try and raise intellectual level of the forum by finishing you dialogue with the following?

The only place where a slimy, filthy, disgusting pig like you feels at home. Now go suck another cock behind the dumpster, you fucking jagoff swineboy. Originally Posted by lustylad

.

Did you try and raise intellectual level of the forum by finishing you dialogue with the following?









. Originally Posted by WTF

Its above yours and Asswipes intellectual level. I'll throw Green fag in too!