Since the NAZIS are the National Socialist worker's party, and socialism is a LEFTIST ideal, HOW exactly can the neo-nazi's be the "Alt-right"? Originally Posted by garhkalthe act of racism & genocide makes them right wing which is a bogus argument.
Since the NAZIS are the National Socialist worker's party, and socialism is a LEFTIST ideal, HOW exactly can the neo-nazi's be the "Alt-right"? Originally Posted by garhkalYou are a fucking imbecile. How old are you? Home schooled?
Dilbert, Since when has wanting genocide been a right wing trait?? Originally Posted by garhkalSince agenda driven lib-retards took control of most media outlets and began saying so ... ignore factual history and forget, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc., etc., etc. Just read authors like Chomsky or the retards posting at Wikipedia, they tell you so.
A simple question but not a simple answer. I've been reading the frequent use of the term by both the media, left wing activists, and democrat politicians. I don't see any conservatives using the term so it must be a construct of the left. So, I ask our left wing scholars here to inform us what is the Alt-Right. Since we see it continued to be spoken maybe we should all be on the same page as to what it means. Of course, some sort of evidence must be given to support any claims. Also, no cut and paste is going to be sufficient since everyone who uses it seems to mean more than one thing and ther is no real agreement.Good observation and you're right on target. Being that the Main Stream Media is owned and funded by leftist millionaires and the Entertainment Industry is as well. Both of these entities are corporations and are profit orientated. It shouldn't be no surprise they would construct groups to oppose one another for the sole purpose of profit. If the Charlottesville Rally was a peaceful demonstration with a clear concise message the media wouldn't have even covered it because it wouldn't generate profit for the corporation. So it was definitely a leftist project to stir up racial tensions and to arouse public opinion. Some people really thought they were at a legitimate rally others were brought in to specifically cause trouble and they were compensated for it. Now some people did get hurt, but the parties involved that fomented this shit really don't care, profit overrides everything.
Since there is an Alt-Right or so we have been told, there must be an Alt-Left. So please define that term as well. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
If the Charlottesville Rally was a peaceful demonstration with a clear concise message the media wouldn't have even covered it because it wouldn't generate profit for the corporation. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisinYeah, cause most peaceful protests always start with guys showing up in full nazi gear armed with assault rifles.
Yeah, cause most peaceful protests always start with guys showing up in full nazi gear armed with assault rifles.Keep up dumbass it was never meant to be peaceful. That's why it was fucking orchestrated, that's why nobody was shot. The violence was planned. The police were ordered to stand down. They didn't know it was orchestrated until after it was all over. They are pretty much pissed off about it too.
Originally Posted by JCM800