Actually, this thread disparages WaPo, the NYT and other lame-stream media venues for disparaging Bush41; hence, this thread is in defense of Bush41. Originally Posted by I B HankeringIf you think using Bush's death is a proper venue to disparage the NYT or WaPo , then we disagree.
If they haven't "corrected" their "lie" after 26 years then maybe they dont think its a lie. They are not like Eccie where you can just change peoples words and put FTFY. Your Story and sources were clearly FAKE NEWS. And to do it during a great mans death, well, reeks of politics.
Yet another lie created out of thin air. I have not criticized either Bush, and certainly not in the lying manner the farcical NYT has demonstrated over the course of the past three decades. 26 years they've had to correct their lie, but they haven't withdrawn it yet. I challenge you to find such a post where I did anything other than defend Bush43 and especially Bush41. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
If you think using Bush's death is a proper venue to disparage the NYT or WaPo , then we disagree.Disparaging WaPo and the NYT is an everyday event, but doubly justified when they denigrated Bush41 with Fake News stories to denigrate his presidency.
Maybe Bush is just the enemy of your enemy and can be used however... Originally Posted by WTF
If they haven't "corrected" their "lie" after 26 years then maybe they dont think its a lie. They are not like Eccie where you can just change peoples words and put FTFY. Your Story and sources were clearly FAKE NEWS. And to do it during a great mans death, well, reeks of politics.
RIP Mr President. Thank you for your Service Originally Posted by themystic
Then let it be an everyday event.... Bush's passing is not an everyday event is my point. Originally Posted by WTFDisparaging a recently deceased president with "FAKE NEWS" isn't an "every day event", and the lies need to be immediately and vigorously addressed when they occur to keep the lies from taking root in the public's mind one second longer than necessary.
Disparaging WaPo and the NYT is an everyday event, but doubly justified when they denigrated Bush41 with Fake News stories to denigrate his presidency.Now I remember that story from 26 years ago. I remember because that's when Bill Clinton beat 41 for president. It was funny 41, RIP, was in a grocery store and didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Talk about out of touch with the peeps. Poor guy.I think they even had a picture to prove it. As I recall a bunch of reporters from various news outlets verified the story. One thing I'm a bit fuzzy on, Wasn't that a grocery store in the Ukrainian capital
Even Snopes called the NYT on their lie; so, it would be you who is propagating FAKE NEWS without substantive proof to provide even the flimsiest support for your POV. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Now I remember that story from 26 years ago. I remember because that's when Bill Clinton beat 41 for president. It was funny 41, RIP, was in a grocery store and didn't know what a grocery scanner was. Talk about out of touch with the peeps. Poor guy.I think they even had a picture to prove it. As I recall a bunch of reporters from various news outlets verified the story. One thing I'm a bit fuzzy on, Wasn't that a grocery store in the Ukrainian capital Originally Posted by themysticYou're regurgitating the FAKE NEWS lie reported by the NYT.
You're regurgitating the FAKE NEWS lie reported by the NYT. Originally Posted by I B HankeringAre you citing Snopes as a Reliable source? Those guys are fake news. I offer the following proof
Are you citing Snopes as a Reliable source? Those guys are fake news. I offer the following proofEven WaPo says the NYT's piece isn't true: hence FAKE NEWS. Only gullible, dim-retard moron's still believe that NYT's FAKE NEWS story is true.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2015/11/...-cheering-911/ Originally Posted by themystic
Even WaPo says the NYT's piece isn't true: hence FAKE NEWS. Only gullible, dim-retard moron's still believe that NYT's FAKE NEWS story is true. Originally Posted by I B HankeringSo the Washington Post and Snopes are reliable news sources? This is really good info. Ill start using them as my sources to track our current President. Thanks buddy
So the Washington Post and Snopes are reliable news sources? This is really good info. Ill start using them as my sources to track our current President. Thanks buddy Originally Posted by themysticFollow Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire. They'll keep you better informed than either Snopes or WaPo. There are fewer incidents of "Fake News" from the Daily Wire than the NYT. The Daily Wire conscientiously avoided publishing a FAKE NEWS story about Bush41.
Follow Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire. They'll keep you better informed than either Snopes or WaPo. There are fewer incidents of "Fake News" from the Daily Wire than the NYT. The Daily Wire conscientiously avoided publishing a FAKE NEWS story about Bush41. Originally Posted by I B HankeringHere's one I just found that has Ben Shapiro, The Daily wire and Washington Post. Ill read the Full article later. Finally some NON FAKE NEWS. Thanks Brother
Here's one I just found that has Ben Shapiro, The Daily wire and Washington Post. Ill read the Full article later. Finally some NON FAKE NEWS. Thanks BrotherShapiro has always been anti-Trump, but he doesn't peddle FAKE NEWS like the NYTs.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ne-booth-chan/ Originally Posted by themystic