Ladies, are some of the reviewers full of shit?

I'm not afraid of anything. What is the point in writing a bad review when the lady was as represented in her showcase, on time, professional and willing. There was simply no connection between us...that's not her fault. Originally Posted by Billy Babitt

so that others can know that she is not all that and a bag of chips. :^}

seriously, it can show that she human and not 100% perfect for every client.

oh, btw, if one believes that reviews on eccie are supposed to be a true objective recounting of an encounter between one or more guys and one or more providers ...
or that eccie staff can control the objectivity of the reviews ...
then i have a bridge to sell you. :^}

they are fiction w/ a smidge or two of truth in there (like the contact info, location, and maybe the age/appearance sections).
take them for whatever worth you read in them.

Did you know that your two posts written minutes one after another state two polar opposite opinions about the same thing?

so that others can know that she is not all that and a bag of chips. :^}

seriously, it can show that she human and not 100% perfect for every client. Originally Posted by pmdelites

oh, btw, if one believes that reviews on eccie are supposed to be a true objective recounting of an encounter between one or more guys and one or more providers ...
or that eccie staff can control the objectivity of the reviews ...
then i have a bridge to sell you. :^}

they are fiction w/ a smidge or two of truth in there (like the contact info, location, and maybe the age/appearance sections).
take them for whatever worth you read in them. Originally Posted by pmdelites

So while I agree with what you first said, I disagree with what you said in your second post.

Obviously, not every encounter is going to be the same, but a review is suppose to be written so that anyone reading it has a good indication of what he is going to get for his time and money, service wise, not just looks, location and contact info, and not how well the reviewer can write a fictional story to boost his "attaboy" count or basically be a deceptive ad to bait guys to make a provider's phone ring.

If reviews are not suppose to be the reporting of one's actual encounter with a provider and just fiction, then why would there be any negative reviews posted? Who in their right mind would post a negative review as his fantasy?

Going with your version of what a review is (guess that means how one should take the legitimacy of your reviews then, right?), no wonder why the OP started this thread! I would rather read a simple review that is short with all points covered than a drawn out one that reads like an embellished romantic novel. Also, given your history of commenting under reviews and the questions you ask, I think you would also prefer the real version of events as opposed to making shit up for view count.

OMG it never stop. Soooo condescending.

I can cum multiple times in a row if the gent is skilled or cares enough to try to learn my body. I can get what I call rolling orgasms where I cum and then have another right after ..as if I just can’t get it all the way out

... Originally Posted by Analeese

The rolling orgasm topic magnetically caught my attention ! That is a sublime thing to unleash , when it happens.

First time I had a lady experiencing it with me , I probably enjoyed it much more than she did!!

another time , I had a provider experiencing it first time ever for her , ... and it was not my first session with her, .... to say it was memorable it is an understatement..

With time I perfected some techniques and angles to make that possible, but it is not a given for every time, ... as said , the psychology factor/comfort/trust plays a key role as well.

I never wrote about it in a review . I think it would be difficult to believe it , the intensity seems unreal, and also would raise the bar so high for the ladies in questions, creating a lot of unmet expectations for other decent customers.

Writing reviews with details a lady is unlikely to deliver again and again is a little unfair and is more a thing for a testosterone blinded ego and not useful info, IMHO.

Enjoying it selfishly ads to the quality of the residual memory of it!

OMG it never stop. Soooo condescending. Originally Posted by Analeese

I know, the horror of it all for someone giving their opinion(s) about reviews on an opinionated review board! I think you should RTM the post.

Lol yep you’re right

The rolling orgasm topic magnetically caught my attention ! That is a sublime thing to unleash , when it happens.

First time I had a lady experiencing it with me , I probably enjoyed it much more than she did!!

another time , I had a provider experiencing it first time ever for her , ... and it was not my first session with her, .... to say it was memorable it is an understatement..

With time I perfected some techniques and angles to make that possible, but it is not a given for every time, ... as said , the psychology factor/comfort/trust plays a key role as well.

I never wrote about it in a review . I think it would be difficult to believe it , the intensity seems unreal, and also would raise the bar so high for the ladies in questions, creating a lot of unmet expectations for other decent customers.

Writing reviews with details a lady is unlikely to deliver again and again is a little unfair and is more a thing for a testosterone blinded ego and not useful info, IMHO.

Enjoying it selfishly ads to the quality of the residual memory of it! Originally Posted by Ashi

You’re right it doesn’t happen every time but when it does it’s absolutely amazing and almost euphoric.....

I think your post was spot on very well worded and thought out . Some guys here read reviews and want that exact experience without realizing that was two people with chemistry creating memories bcd together ..like magic sometimes

Edit: I love your avatar is that a lady here...

If you were to read a review, you'd find that most have a disclaimer up front that it's a fantasy, or a work of fiction.

I checked with my colleague, Louie, of the top law firm Louie, Dewey Cheatem & Howe. He assures me those disclaimers provide total protection to the reviewer against any criminal or civil action.

True, I am envious of a guy that fuck 4 times in an hour, shoot a gallon of sperm all the way to the ceiling and make a woman orgasm at least 28 times in 30 minutes. Getting beyond that, all I want to know is what her menu was like, did she weigh less than me, and
HOW MUCH WAS THE DAMN DONATION.

Most of the reviews IMHO are without value, just done for gaining premium access and stroking the author's ego - Kendall4U was spot on with an astute earlier observation about comment count as a way of measuring success - most of those are requests for rate, another reason the low self-esteem egos leave off the price.

This thread is valuable for me. I should be writing my first review before long. Makes me a touch nervous, lol

Each ROS tells a story, but it is more than what it seems. Everybody writes reviews for a reason, and it reflects at least as much on the writer profile, as on the reviewed provider . Once you understand this, you know what info to extract and how relevant it is to each reader.

My genuine motivation to write down the encounter's story is for me to read it and relive the " fictitious" event years after, when the details are lost. True, I post some of these, after sanitizing them a bit to get more PA points and maintain my buddy list. I do not bother with any rare disappointing encounter after it happened. It is me who is to blame for not reading the right signals...

Reviews are not my main supply of info . Hobby buddies are much better at that. I also do not switch my destinations as frequently as I used too, I am too spoiled by the ones I currently frequent.

If I do not mention 401k contributions, it it assumed to be local std, especially for AMPs.

Lady A,
Thank you for the kind words, I like chemistry and obviously magic girls ... with beautiful legs.

A

P.S. The lady in my avatar, just went up in smoke and self-combusted ... maybe OhhD'ed from a rolling Ohh ! LOL

note: when one reads "you" or "yours" below, know that it can mean wile e. or it can mean any eccie user.

Did you know that your two posts written minutes one after another state two polar opposite opinions about the same thing?

So while I agree with what you first said, I disagree with what you said in your second post.

Obviously, not every encounter is going to be the same, but a review is suppose to be written so that anyone reading it has a good indication of what he is going to get ... not just looks, location and contact info, and not how well the reviewer can write a fictional story ... Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote

obviously, i did not get my points across.

1) reviews are whatever the writer wants them to be.
and since there are not any rules or objective evaluation criteria on how they ARE SUPPOSED to be written, no one can say with 100% certaintity that
a) they ARE supposed to be a true objective recounting of an encounter between one or more guys and one or more providers,
b) they ARE NOT supposed to be truly objective, or
c) they ARE supposed to be a specific or variable mix of both.

2. thus, when i read a review, i realize that it's MOSTLY fiction and SOME reality in there.

so, if i believe what i read, it was "true" for me.
if i think it's fictional (including exaggerated for whatever reason), it was "not completely true" for me.
what you believe is what you believe, not something i decide for you.

take a review for whatever worth you read in a review.
thus, i stand behind my two posts.

If reviews are not suppose to be the reporting of one's actual encounter with a provider and just fiction, then why would there be any negative reviews posted? Who in their right mind would post a negative review as his fantasy?

Going with your version of what a review is (guess that means how one should take the legitimacy of your reviews then, right?), ... Also, given your history of commenting under reviews and the questions you ask, I think you would also prefer the real version of events as opposed to making shit up for view count. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote

regardless if it's a negative or a postive review, each review has some truth and some fiction. a negative one can be true fantasy just as a positive one can.
if you dont know why someone "... in their right mind would post a negative review as his fantasy", i suggest you expand your concepts of what a review can be.

"guess that means how one should take the legitimacy of your reviews then, right?"
yes, by all means - question, laugh at, believe my reviews included. it only slightly matters to me.
my intent is my intent. i own it.
your understanding/reaction is yours. i suggest you own yours.

wrt to why i comment on some reviews, i ask questions to seek clarifications, not cos i want the reviews to be "true".

i love a great story, regardless if true or fictional.

thus, i stand behind my points of view.
and behind a woman when "walking her dog".

what Ashi said in the post before mine!!!

DEEP DICKIN!!!!!!

I nutted,paid and left

@ PMD

Obviously, you did not get my point either so I think we need to agree to disagree on what the intention of a review is. What is also obvious is NO ONE but the reviewer and the provider knows what really went on in the session. So while there are no rules about how a review should be posted (no one can verify one way or another), IMO, it is clear that the romantic novel or pimp ad review are total works of fiction with an end game in mind with the intention to get others to play.

The trouble with embellished reviews for acceptance is when multiple guys read it, set an appointment and goes in expecting the same service and not getting it, not only does that leave a bad opinion of the original reviewer, but also you never know about some guys who seriously believe the encounter was real and because she does not do those services or say those things, it may trigger them to do something else altogether. So doing a fictitious review might put a provider in danger.

All I am saying is a review, while opinionated by the reviewer, needs to be of his actual encounter, not of what he would have like to have happened or what she would like him to say and reporting it as fact. If that means he does not get any accolades for the great read, then so be it.

I will stand behind my points of view as well.