Seomon, my naive friend. The giant corporations and government are one and the same.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
So, if I understand you correctly, you are saying that Enron = government, that Arthur Anderson = government, that Philip Morris = government, that AT&T = government, that RCA = government???... I am not naive. I just understand the difference between wielding influence and being the vehicle by which influence is achieved. Ask yourslf this: why do media deal with Al Sharpton? It's not because he is a genius (clearly he is not). It is because he wields influence. It is the same with Jessie Jackson or the man who made Republicans sign the non-tax pledge.
This drama of "liberal" v. "conservative" is simply a distraction, like a magician's sleight of hand, to distract us from what is really going on. Ask yourself, does anything really change? There is supposed to be a huge contrast between Presidents Bush and Obama, but did things really change? Not really, the differences are cosmetic, and not substantive.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
This I agree with very much. In fact, there is not much difference between party platforms, despite the fact that people LOVE to spew the few differences between conservative/liberal, democrat/republican as if they are significant. They are separated only by dogmatic ideology.
But to the tax code. Why should I help fund your decision to have children, buy a car, buy a house, buy a solar panel or whatever? The current tax code, as I have said, is simply a vehicle to fund members of Congress' re-election campaigns. (And I have a doctoral law degree in taxation).
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
And so what you are arguing is that even though society designates something a common good, that the very act of enacting, say, a tax code to promote it is by its very nature autocratic? Hmmm... might you be an anarchist? (I am not asking this question out of jest) Is this why government/corporate support/enforcement of anything is quite distasteteful to you? If this is the case, nothing I can ever say will sway you. And while I don't agree with that position, I can respect it.
And boy, government schools are doing a bang up job, aren't they?
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Actually, yes, they are. UC Berkeley is only rivaled by Stanford for the most Nobel winners. In fact, the entire UC system produces some of the best scholars in the world. KU's journalism school is one of the best in the world, along with MU. KSU has one of the best agronomy and engineering schools in the world. If you look for bad - then that's all you'll ever see.
All I am saying is, Give Liberty a Chance.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
In a democracy, COG, no one will ever enjoy complete liberty. Democracy is based on compromise and majority rule. So even though, as you have correctly noted, that the corporations are entrenched in Capitol Hill and are quite cozy with our elected officials, it doesn't mean that we cannot affect change as Mr. McLintock pointed out. I choose to put my faith in democracy; I choose to put my faith in people.