Very few of those with qualified land to be explored and or fracked were not afforded an opportunity to sign a gas lease. Originally Posted by eccieloverraising my hand as one who was not.
As for Fracking. Yes been going on for at least a few decades. The real issue is that in the last decade or so the fracking injection frequently contains nasty chemicals that start moving through water tables and contaminate neighbors water wells.you've always had to protect fresh water zones
This is the actual issue, not fracking per se. But, the only way to control it is to stop it all. The second issue is that one unscrupulous driller can quickly go into bankruptcy and leave millions of dollars of damage. Including contaminated uninhabitable land/wells.
Note to above poster: My clients have been voiding drilling rights since the 60s using the damage clauses in leases. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
My clients have been voiding drilling rights since the 60s using the damage clauses in leases. And, we go after whomever was buying the oil as well.So what do they do after they void the leases? Make the oil company pay to shut in the wells and clean up the damage and then never lease again? Or turn around and lease to another oil company and collect a bigger bonus and bigger royalty? And maybe include a continuous drilling clause so the new lessee will have to drill and frac or lose some of the acreage? I'm sure it's the later.
It is a real issue. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
On my first day as president, I will sign an executive order that puts a total moratorium on all new fossil fuel leases for drilling offshore and on public lands. And I will ban fracking—everywhere.
Elizabeth Warren
When [Sanders] is in the White House, he is going to ban fracking nationwide and rapidly move to 100 percent clean, sustainable energy
Bernie Sanders, speaking in the 3rd person
There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking
Kamala Harris
It’s easy for politicians and activists to call for an end to hydraulic fracturing—but now we know what the consequences could be. Without fracking, the U.S. would surrender our status as a global energy superpower. Every American family could face higher prices for the energy they consume and the products and services they buy, and almost 15 million Americans could be out of work. These extreme and irresponsible proposals should not be considered. Ignorance can no longer be an excuse."
Karen Harbert, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber’s Institute
So what do these bozos want? For the U.S. to become dependent on oil imports from the Middle East again? Exactly how is the USA going to generate electricity when and where there's no natural gas or sun or wind, since they want to ban nuclear and coal too? Maybe we can import liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar, Iran and Russia. They've got lots of gas.
Perhaps Trump was wise sending those troops to Saudi Arabia. We may need them there to protect the Straits of Hormuz once Elizabeth Warren becomes President. Originally Posted by Tiny
Tiny! great choice for your name.... seemed you're self aware dude! Originally Posted by Clit EastwoodWhy do you care? Fracking is banned in New York and always will be.