"If I knew then, what I know now"

HF - it is "woke" hypocrisy - lying by and for DPST causes is quite permissible and encouraged - but such an act by a Conservative is a crime.
In a Nutshell - 9500 and his childish memes.

I see that mccabe has weighed in. he says rosenstein is lying. he was fully briefed on the fisa warrant.


evidently.. someone is lying here.

Your obsession with memes is childish. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

If yous say so.

enigmatic:

HISTORICAL USAGE OF ENIGMATIC

ENIGMATIC has always meant “ambiguous, obscure, perplexing” since the adjective entered English in the 17th century. This word comes from the Latin adjective aenigmaticus, from the Greek adjective ainigmatikós, a derivative of the Greek noun aínigma (stem ainigmat-) “a dark saying, riddle, taunt.”

Aínigma (the direct source of English ENIGMA, meaning “a riddle or puzzling situation”) is a derivative of the verb ainíssesthai “to speak in words full of content,” then “to speak in words difficult to understand,” and finally “to speak in riddles,” a progression in meaning that seems very apt in modern life.

Ainíssesthai is a derivative of the noun aînos, “tale, story” in Homer, then “meaningful words, praise, tale with a moral, fable, riddle.” This little family of Greek words, like 60 percent of Greek vocabulary, has no known etymology.

How's that for childish?

Right Wacky?

I see that mccabe has weighed in. he says rosenstein is lying. he was fully briefed on the fisa warrant.


evidently.. someone is lying here. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Well . . . SURPRISE Surprise surprise.




https://aclj.org/public-policy/radio...ein-of-perjury

The issue specifically is Andrew McCabe, who we had the discussion about on the show yesterday, as to whether he was going to be silent? This is also a guy who is suing to get his pension back. Would he try to claim the 5th Amendment? Now he’s accusing people of crimes. If I’m a U.S. attorney, not even just the Senate staff which I think has an absolute right to subpoena McCabe now because he put himself in the middle of it by making a new statement, I’m definitely bringing these two in.

9500- u blew it - the old warner Bros. cartoons - had a message hidden in them - very much as did Rod Serling in Twilight Zone ( see darkness Falls episode).

A meme not quite as foolish as U intended.

LOL

looks like the rats have now turned on each other.


I was surprised by mccabes statement. I know he has a lawsuit pending over his firing. this puts him in the crosshairs of an investigation. this is going make him look bad.

Anyone remember Turkey? Why are they so important to this story?



Energy?

Or power? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Lying by the FBI is politics. Lying to any judge is criminal.


I was, and still am, way ahead of YOU before the post. Or thread. "Turkey and Swiss please." Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Feds press criminal case against Flynn partner


https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...partner-306881

Prosecutors contend that Inovo was actually a front for the Turkish government and that the lobbying and messaging campaign Flynn and Rafiekian had no real business element, but was aimed at a prominent opponent of the Turkish government, cleric Fetullah Gulen.

are they moving the goal post on flynn?

9500- certainly has - and is posting his nuclear ambitions again.
Politico - a left propaganda rag - i refuse any belief in that until corroborated by at least three non-PC - non-leftist sources.

After attempting to drop flynn prosecution -Will Barr come back with a new charge without careful investigation - I doubt it.

And it comes out in 'politico' without nyt or Wacompost - which would headline any such news.


9500 is just engaging in "wishful thinking".

Feds press criminal case against Flynn partner


https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...partner-306881
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Fine, and if Flynn is guilty of a crime in that case, no problem here. I'm only commenting on the mountain of evidence we now see that the FBI sat on for over 3 years that Flynn did not conspire to interfere in the election and that talking to the Russian Amb. was not an illegal act. Nothing has changed on that front.

Lying by the FBI is politics. Lying to any judge is criminal.

And the FBI lied to the FISA judge about Carter Page and withheld exculpatory evidence in the Flynn matter neither of which you seem to grasp or do but don't care.

I see that mccabe has weighed in. he says rosenstein is lying. he was fully briefed on the fisa warrant.


evidently.. someone is lying here. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Which is why the Senate hearings are necessary contrary to the whining of the Democrats. Problem for McCabe is that even if he fully briefed Rosenstein, the briefing included Brady violations, so saying Rosenstein was fully briefed about illegal matters, doesn't exactly exonerate him. I think they both have problems and Rosenstein did himself and his reputation no good in his testimony that he did not read but only "reviewed" documents given to him which in common language means he took the word of the FBI and just signed his name which I tend to believe is probably true. How can the acting AG do another investigation of the FBI agents before he can sign what is put in front of him? He has to rely on the professionalism of the FBI which we now see was wanting at best.

DPST's care not how the FBI abused the Rule of law against Flynn - he is identified by their political narrative as an opponent.

What the short-sighted DPST's fail to realize - if they get out of line of their political masters - the same illegal acts under the Constitution used against flynn can be used against themselves.

When the rule of law breaks down for One - it breaks down for all!!!!


Hypocritically - DPST's applaud action against Flynn - and look at themselves as the perpetrators and as such - inviolable.



Durham - When he reports - DPST criminals may find themselves not so immune.

looks like director wray is refusing to release the documents house committee wants in their investigation.

Wray has announced his own "Investigation" into the Fisa warrant mes - looks like he is just trying to CYA from outside investigations.

Which is why the Senate hearings are necessary contrary to the whining of the Democrats. Problem for McCabe is that even if he fully briefed Rosenstein, the briefing included Brady violations, so saying Rosenstein was fully briefed about illegal matters, doesn't exactly exonerate him. I think they both have problems and Rosenstein did himself and his reputation no good in his testimony that he did not read but only "reviewed" documents given to him which in common language means he took the word of the FBI and just signed his name which I tend to believe is probably true. How can the acting AG do another investigation of the FBI agents before he can sign what is put in front of him? He has to rely on the professionalism of the FBI which we now see was wanting at best. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

rosenstein knew what was going on- and willingly participated - IMHO.

he is trying his best to weasel out of culpability - he and McCabe should share a cell for some goodly number of years.

And - make good Flynn's financial losses defending himself.

it was knowing- and malicious - IMHO.