The takeover of Seattle.
Fortunately, Seattle was (and is) NOT "takenover"!
UNFORTUNATELY for the CommunistSocialistLiberalLoons the "grand" experiment in Seattle is demonstrating daily that there agenda is not only fraudulent, but entirely wrong .... countries do need borders and walls along with their borders, enforcers to protect their borders, and identifications to assure those intruding into the perimeter of their borders belonged there in the first place. In addition that countries are dependent on other countries for supplies and sustenance for those who belong and the collection of taxes to pay for the necessaries to keep those inside the borders sustained.
Washington Criminal Code
9.81.010 Definitions. 9.81.010 Definitions.
(1) "Organization" means an organization, corporation, company, partnership, association, trust, foundation, fund, club, society, committee, political party, or any group of persons, whether or not incorporated, permanently or temporarily associated together for joint action or advancement of views on any subject or subjects.
(2) "Subversive organization" means any organization which engages in or advocates, abets, advises, or teaches, or a purpose of which is to engage in or advocate, abet, advise, or teach activities intended to overthrow, destroy or alter, or to assist in the overthrow, destruction or alteration of, the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the state of Washington, or of any political subdivision of either of them, by revolution, force or violence
Federal Authority
USC 15: INSURRECTION
§333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
I suppose somewhere buried in that statute is a provision that PissLousy must approve it!
Let her and the DimWits disapprove it!