Please hurry to France. Originally Posted by gnadflyI'm working as hard as I can at it!! Know anybody who has a good case?
You don't like the President, and you desperately want him voted out...we get it! But it seems lame to pick on his wife because you don't agree with his policies or his very legitimacy.We have a resident hater (Whirlaway). He just can't help himself. He is not the scientific type...he looks for things that adhere to his beliefs instead of reporting all the facts that might give a better context and counter to his worldview.
Seems you guys would be better served by concertrating efforts towards defeating him fair and square, instead of creating non-issues, no?
ha! Originally Posted by racitraci
.....It's a fake photo.... she was not there at the time... but it's still her , as First Lady!!
And for those who try to attack Mrs. Obama's fashion choices, you're obviously unaware the she's highly regarded by industry insiders(the experts), for having impeccable style and savvy. Besides, what the heck do you guys really know about 'fashion', ha! Originally Posted by racitraci
Who are you to critique her attire? I'm sure there were advisors with far more fashion sense than you and your frumpy avatar advising the first lady. What a STUPID comment! Originally Posted by Little StevieDo you recall the ceremony and the dress? I saw it live on TV and her fashion choice was instantly criticized by various outlets. This was the first link I found on the incident:
You honestly think that? On the same day where you say you want the "fringes" of both parties to go away?
His post was nothing but opinionated nonsense, based on nothing but the voices in his head. Originally Posted by Doove
........................Funny how this same group of people who we called the Taliban- were the Muhajadheen whom we were arming during the soviet invasion and we labeled that "taliban" during that time as the "good" guys. And they were fighting the soviet backed militia who were you guessed it the "northern alliance"- now the tables turn and we are now helping the former people we were once killing.
In the 80's oh we had no trouble arming Saddam to fight against the Ayatollah - Saddam I guess was the good guy back then even though he gassed his own people when he was our "ally"- you didn't hear Reagan or George Bush the elder complaining did you? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911
I think the Obamas are outside the mainstream on this issue. I think the vast majority of Americans hold soldiers reverent for what they do for this country for very little pay. Originally Posted by OliviaHowardThat darn free market.....
It's amazing to me that all these folks who supposedly value the service of the men and women who volunteer for the military are allegedly all bent out of shape about who attends a memorial service. But they aren't the least bit upset of the real betrayal of these same folks by our elected leaders who send them into needless wars of choice that are inherently unwinnable, and which in fact, don't even have any real definition of victory.* Finally , rarely.... something posted from the smarter end of the Hog!
To me, who shows up to greet a coffin is a trivial matter. But for someone to volunteer for the military is an incredible act of trust. That individual trusts our political leadership to make the correct choice as to when to commit our armed forces to combat. To not repeat the mistakes of Korea and Vietnam and try to solve political problems with military means. To not waste the precious blood of American youth on foolish political misadventures.
Yet all these supposed "summer soldiers and sunshine patriots" who use the occasion of a handful of these men and women's death to gain petty partisan political advantage, as as silent as the tomb when the real betray occurs. Did you hear them clamoring that Bush had the blood of American soldiers on his hands for six years? Did you hear them lamenting Bush being on near permanent vacation in Texas while this travesty of two wars of choice with no exit strategy took more and more lives? Did you hear one peep out of them then? I didn't.
You know, it's a smiley no-good son-of-a-bitch who will use the senseless death of a trusting soldier who died needlessly in the line of duty for a vainglorious chicken hawk's foolish political needs for his own political gain.
But I guess that's pretty much standard operating procedure for the Republicans these days. They will claim to support the military, but we know it's a lie. They try to assassinate the character of John Kerry, a man with two Purple Hearts and a Silver Star. Sen. Max Cleland, a man who had already received a Silver Star and a Purple Heart, volunteered for one more mission before being discharged in Vietnam. On that oast mission he lost three limbs to a grenade. The Republicans then run a political advertisement comparing him to Osama bin Laden. Some support.
Cheap theatrics may cut it with some, but not with me. The real betrayal is sending volunteers in where we have no national interest, not in sending an insufficiently large delegation to meet a hand full of caskets. Originally Posted by TexTushHog