and as being racist, no? Ptsd, yes?

HDGristle's Avatar
So using your silly logic, you are saying a HO has to see anyone and everyone that contacts them?

They can't say that they only see guys over a certain age?
They can't say that they don't see guys who haven't taken a shower in a week?
They can't say that they won't see someone who doesn't pass their screening?
They can't say that they won't see someone dangerous like Tattas?
They can't say that they won't see someone who may trigger a very bad memory?

Doesn't work that way - she can use whatever criteria she wants to pick and choose who she is willing to see - just like you can do the same. That is everyone's right Originally Posted by berryberry
She can use whatver criteria she wants. But others are free to agree, disagree, not give a fuck or find it repugnant.
Berry if you say she apologized by her first line of her post you are missing where she goes on about how Pittsburgh men need to step up their game. Do you really consider that a genuine apology? Hell I doubt her story about the kidnapping is true. If something that traumatic happened would you honestly continue this line of work? Use your head.
berryberry's Avatar
Berry if you say she apologized by her first line of her post you are missing where she goes on about how Pittsburgh men need to step up their game. Do you really consider that a genuine apology? Hell I doubt her story about the kidnapping is true. If something that traumatic happened would you honestly continue this line of work? Use your head. Originally Posted by paintedbynumbers
First, I already have said she should have stopped her apology after her explanation of her past traumatic experience as why she does not see black guys. But as I also said, everyone has a breaking point when they feel they have been unfairly tarred and feathered and maybe she reached hers.

Second, yeah, like nothing bad could ever happen to a woman in this line of work. Get real.

Third, as to why someone who had a traumatic experience may continue this line of work, perhaps they don't have any other good options to put a roof over their head, food in their stomach, etc? Where else are some of these women going to make what they do in an hour? They can work an hour or two at this and make more than they can working 40 hours flipping burgers or whatever. So they continue seeing guys they are comfortable with while taking reasonable steps to not be reminded of or repeat that traumatic experience.
chizzy's Avatar
She also asked him for references. Had she actually checked those references, she could have politely declined his appointment requests.

The truth is people are defending her because they don’t find racial discrimination objectionable. It should come as no surprise that they are two of the more vocal Trump supporters on this forum. Originally Posted by El-mo
If you are referring to me with this post, fuck you for labeling all trump supporters that way

If you weren't referring to me, fuck you anyway for labeling all trump supporters that way

I'm defending her right with her body to choose who she sees, black white, young or old, skinny or fat.
I mean you fucking liberals love to say it's a womans body and it's her right when it comes to abortion, right?
So why isnt her right to decide who she sees?

I do agree it was fucked up her wasting his time and how she handled it.


hmmm, i just put this edit in, i changed my mind, forget the fuck you el-mo.... Everyone is entitled to view and give their opinions as they see it . even if yours labels all trump supporters the exact same way you seem to feel some people label blacks.... think about that for a minute
You can change whether or not you support Trump.


You can't change whether or not you're black. So that's a bullshit analogy at best and racist analogy more than likely.
chizzy's Avatar
By 2020 standards, yes, absolutely. Originally Posted by Big Stig

damn, i guess im racist then..... well i guess there are alot of us then.............

I mean i see lots of ads from black girls who wont see black guys either/..................fucking racist bitches
chizzy's Avatar
You can change whether or not you support Trump.


You can't change whether or not you're black. So that's a bullshit analogy at best and racist analogy more than likely. Originally Posted by Wizard2019
and this is a stupid fucking comment....

el mo suggesting all trump supportors are racist is no different than someone saying all blacks are thugs

can you now fucking understand?
  • El-mo
  • 11-10-2020, 02:59 PM
and this is a stupid fucking comment....

el mo suggesting all trump supportors are racist is no different than someone saying all blacks are thugs

can you now fucking understand? Originally Posted by chizzy
I am suggestion that 100% of Trump supporters have at least, a high tolerance for racism, and more than a couple exemplified that by defending racial discrimination right here in this thread. I’m not here to argue with you, so if you’re mad, you can stay mad. The facts are in evidence.
Not all trump supporters are racist but most racists are trump supporters.
chizzy's Avatar
I am suggestion that 100% of Trump supporters have at least, a high tolerance for racism, and more than a couple exemplified that by defending racial discrimination right here in this thread. I’m not here to argue with you, so if you’re mad, you can stay mad. The facts are in evidence. Originally Posted by El-mo
Not mad at all, you just proved my point.... you believe all trump supporters are racist or dont mind racism, so that would also include the millions of black and Hispanic voters who supported him also. I cant speak for 70 some million voters but for my self, voted based on policy not on personality. I do not care for trump as a person but his policies are far better than what is coming if biden listens to the far left. For you to claim 70 million people are all racist
Is in fact, a true definition of being racist and for that, I feel sorry for you
berryberry's Avatar
I am suggestion that 100% of Trump supporters have at least, a high tolerance for racism, and more than a couple exemplified that by defending racial discrimination right here in this thread. Originally Posted by El-mo
Fact check: FALSE

There was no racial discrimination in this thread. Free choice still exists in the USA, at least for now (although I am sure the socialist left wants to eliminate that as well).

Please show me the law that forces an individual to have sex with someone they choose not to. I will wait.
HDGristle's Avatar
Bullshit strawman, B
berryberry's Avatar
Bullshit strawman, B Originally Posted by HDGristle
So I take it that means you can't show me the law that forces an individual to have sex with someone they choose not to. Cool
HDGristle's Avatar
So I take it that means you can't show me the law that forces an individual to have sex with someone they choose not to. Cool Originally Posted by berryberry
The ability to make the choice isn't in question. Address the actual issues.
exactly,

how many days old is the original post and she has yet to change her sig to "I do not see men of color" it takes 2 fucking minutes. If she was truly sorry she would have done it. But again, it was a bullshit apology and likely a bullshit story as well when you find that she made racist comments about blacks to other white members here.

I'd love to hear you defend her reasoning for not changing her sig 4-5 days after the original post. You say she has read all of comments, well the one thing WE ALL agree on is that she can easily mention in her long ass sig that "I do not see men of color" and alas as of now she still hasn't.