"All this hoo-ha about his age, half the US army is that age or just a year or 2 older. My sons were all excellent marksmen at half that, in a tree stand with a 30-30."you made a presumption that turned out to be wrong.
Might be right about a year or two older, probably wrong about 17, but doesn't matter, nor does marksmanship. The difference is, those of that age in the military are disciplined and supervised by those of presumably greater maturity, not running amok in a throng with no legal authority other than in their own minds.
He did the wrong thing by even being there.
I did not say his mother BOUGHT the gun, but evidently she DID drive him and his gun to the scene (yeah, she didn't know he had a gun....). Whatever, what responsible parent would knowingly deliver their child to such a fracas? I suppose it'd be ok to drive your 17 y/o daughter to a gang bang hosted by a bunch of your buddies. Originally Posted by reddog1951
own it
Agreed TxDot. Still no one cares to address my central question. How did an underage kid get in the situation in the first place? I don't care whether he was right or wrong, assaulted, or thought he was saving the mother country. Sorry, but where were the rational, responsible adults charged with his care, or those on the scene that may/should have recognized a too young participant? Per a response above, I presume his mother drove him there...presumably she also brought his firearm. Some mother for a role model. Right up there with June Cleaver. Originally Posted by reddog1951