AWWW - well - vm - You are welcome to Your Opinion
A Right - You refuse of all others than teh racist, marxist DPST idiotology and narrative of Xinn and Comrade Xi!
... Not sure what the issue is. If we can quote some article in The AtlanticHe just uses leftwing sources as his line of information...that he swears by...hell look at his bogus post that he thinks is factual...
or The New Yorker, then why can't VitaMan use Newsweek as a source?
Surely all seems silly to me.
### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
The straightforward answer is this is another play from the playbook. If the source article does not agree with your agenda, attack the source (the messenger). It's no different than attacking pollsters. Bad poll numbers = a fraudulent pollster. Good poll numbers = a great pollster.But you don't EXCEPT that the PISSANTS has 38% approval rating...you sir are a FUCKING HYPOCRITE!!
That is why so many responses end up using tabloid journalism. Because it fits their agendas. Originally Posted by VitaMan
He just uses leftwing sources as his line of information...that he swears by...hell look at his bogus post that he thinks is factual...Well, yes, I'd agree that 70% of adults in America
Example #1.
The United States reached President Biden’s target of getting at least one dose of coronavirus vaccine to 70 percent of adults just about a month after his goal of July 4. Originally Posted by bb1961
He just uses leftwing sources as his line of information...that he swears by...hell look at his bogus post that he thinks is factual...Take a look at this:
Example #1.
The United States reached President Biden’s target of getting at least one dose of coronavirus vaccine to 70 percent of adults just about a month after his goal of July 4. Originally Posted by bb1961
Cute. But not clever. Originally Posted by VitaManWell, mate - some of us DO NOT BELIEVE the CDC or
I told you before I don't give a shit about Biden. Originally Posted by VitaMan