Encounter: Caution

Sir

Your question was answered A few posted were edited as they were deemed for PA eyes.

The Dr Originally Posted by Dr-epg

Sir. Two questions.

1. Did a mod warn her of this post as she says? Without ROS there's nothing to warn about...if mods are sending ROS to ultimate pro hos it would be interesting, and if not, it is interesting that the comment saying they did is allowed to stand.

2. Did mods determine this to be fake as she says? If not I'd like to see that addressed as well publicly.

Sir. Two questions.

1. Did a mod warn her of this post as she says? Without ROS there's nothing to warn about...if mods are sending ROS to ultimate pro hos it would be interesting, and if not, it is interesting that the comment saying they did is allowed to stand.

2. Did mods determine this to be fake as she says? If not I'd like to see that addressed as well publicly. Originally Posted by aguyiknow

Yeah, this whole deal is fishy.

Sir. Two questions.

1. Did a mod warn her of this post as she says? Without ROS there's nothing to warn about...if mods are sending ROS to ultimate pro hos it would be interesting, and if not, it is interesting that the comment saying they did is allowed to stand.

2. Did mods determine this to be fake as she says? If not I'd like to see that addressed as well publicly. Originally Posted by aguyiknow

Sir

Your comments are appreciated but any actions against other members are not open for discussion they between the staff and that member.

The Dr

Sir

Your comments are appreciated but any actions against other members are not open for discussion they between the staff and that member.

The Dr Originally Posted by Dr-epg

Sorry sir that was worded funny. 1. Meant "did a mod contact her as she says, to say this review was fishy?" As in warning her about this post. Not meant was she warned for her posts.

Meaning did someone mod-related tell her what ROS said, as she claims? I think that should be known, regardless of any private mod-to-poster post warnings or anything which of course are private.

Sorry sir that was worded funny. 1. Meant "did a mod contact her as she says, to say this review was fishy?" As in warning her about this post. Not meant was she warned for her posts.

Meaning did someone mod-related tell her what ROS said, as she claims? I think that should be known, regardless of any private mod-to-poster post warnings or anything which of course are private. Originally Posted by aguyiknow

Sir

Sharing any ROS details with non PA members are against ECCIE guidelines These guidelines are for all members including the staff so don’t even think that would happen.

The Dr

Sir, I appreciate that response. It is exactly what I hoped. Thanks!

According to twitter, “accounts were compromised and photos stolen”. Find it hard to believe someone stole the phone number though. Smells fishy to me.

There is no doubt in my mind it was her. I know who I was talking too. If it were a hack it would be of her photos, her email, her phone number, her cash app account and where she lives. Just use Occam's razor. The simplest answer is the correct one. She is lying.

I don’t buy this story. I’ve met Angela before and I must admit it was an experience of a lifetime. Then again I also have no problem giving screening info to a reputable provider. Angela if you see this screw what these guys say I believe you are a premier provider for the Pittsburgh area and I totally plan on seeing you in the future just waiting for work to calm down

It's your choice. All I can do is tell you my story. She was fine until she wasn't. She is the one claiming a hack why didn't she say that here then? It just started off with accusations of this being a pointed attack. My story has been consistent.

I don’t know what happened, but any time there’s a dispute between a well-known and trusted provider and relatively unknown hobbyist, I tend to be skeptical of the report.

I get the skepticism from that point of view. Again it's your choice just figured I'd share.

I don’t know what happened, but any time there’s a dispute between a well-known and trusted provider and relatively unknown hobbyist, I tend to be skeptical of the report. Originally Posted by El-mo

The provider claims that the mods warned her about the post, the mod says "don't even think that would happen"; and the provider admits on Twitter to the event, just claims there that it was some hack, and denies it ever happening here.

The provider may be well-known but "trusted" should at best be considered debatable.

The provider claims that the mods warned her about the post, the mod says "don't even think that would happen"; and the provider admits on Twitter to the event, just claims there that it was some hack, and denies it ever happening here.

The provider may be well-known but "trusted" should at best be considered debatable. Originally Posted by aguyiknow

Yeah - shocking to see a couple white knights pop up, shocking

This is not the first reported incident of this type with this provider. And as you noted, she claims that the mods warned her about the post, yet the mod says "don't even think that would happen". Hmmmmm. Ask yourself do you believe a moderator here being truthful or a provider who has had reported issues in the past. One is obviously telling a lie. I know which one my money is on

Yes… COMPLETELY shocking…

I wonder if they can answer if defending her will get them a free session… or maybe a discount? 50%? 75?

Oh?… you’re getting NOTHING!? Well…. Doesn’t that beat all.

The Op has about a year in and probably lurks more than he post. I believe him. We all know her track record and we all know the potential dangers of giving these girls money for nothing essentially. And people are surprised when anyone including…. “top class”…. Lol providers give in to the temptation of not keeping their end of the bargain??

They do this all the time which is why you NEVER pay in advance. But hey…. She’s special and could never do this.

Lol C’mon