So you’re a scientist are you? Because a lot of people hide non-binary development for fear of harassment, or getting the shit kicked out of them because wanna be scientists make shit up... Originally Posted by FuckingCuriousHey FC - Calm down and read the article I just posted. It's written by an actual scientist who doesn't "make shit up".
Mixing up the word gender and sex in this. Sex is biology. Gender is the behavior, cultural and psychological traits associated with one sex. Originally Posted by FuckingCuriousNo. Sex and gender are synonymous. There are only two. Always have been, always will be. Otherwise we wouldn't use phrases like "the opposite sex". Many languages (Spanish, Russian, etc.) have masculine/feminine nouns. Will the tranny nuts push to abolish those languages?
Hey FC - Calm down and read the article I just posted. It's written by an actual scientist who doesn't "make shit up". Originally Posted by lustyladSo are a lot of articles that go against what people believe on all sides. Most people still choose to believe what they "feel" to be true. Scientists are also not afraid to admit that new information can result in a different take. We could all stand to learn a thing or two from scientists.
Well, if you read his post #31, he makes shit up. Originally Posted by bambinoHere’s Webster’s definition of gender. Feel free to google.
No. Sex and gender are synonymous. There are only two. Always have been, always will be. Otherwise we wouldn't use phrases like "the opposite sex". Many languages (Spanish, Russian, etc.) have masculine/feminine nouns. Will the tranny nuts push to abolish those languages?Webster’s dictionary
Where do these absurdities come from anyway? Originally Posted by lustylad
So are a lot of articles that go against what people believe on all sides. Most people still choose to believe what they "feel" to be true. Scientists are also not afraid to admit that new information can result in a different take. We could all stand to learn a thing or two from scientists. Originally Posted by tommy156Good grief!
Good grief!https://open.lib.umn.edu/sociology/c...ex-and-gender/
Do you have an issue with the article I just posted that was written by a biologist? If so, I hope you will critique it using science and data, rather than your "feelings". Originally Posted by lustylad
Here’s Webster’s definition of gender. Feel free to google.If you’re born with a penis you’re a male. That’s your sex. If you’re born with a vagina, you’re a female. That’s your sex. Mebbe you should read old versions of Websters. Before they were co/opted.
2.
a
: SEX sense 1a
the feminine gender
b
: the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex
So yeah. Raising a man as “a man”, and wanting to burn down LGBTQ centers is entirely about the second definition as has little to do with biology. Now go back to your grave or be useful and hit some home runs again. Originally Posted by FuckingCurious
If you’re born with a penis you’re a male. That’s your sex. If you’re born with a vagina, you’re a female. That’s your sex. Mebbe you should read old versions of Websters. Before they were co/opted. Originally Posted by bambinoYou are taking about sex. Others are talking about gender. They're no longer synonymous and haven't been for at least 70 years.
If you’re born with a penis you’re a male. That’s your sex. If you’re born with a vagina, you’re a female. That’s your sex. Mebbe you should read old versions of Websters. Before they were co/opted. Originally Posted by bambinoi completely agree with your first two sentences, if you’re talking about the word “Sex”. In Thailand there’s no gay or trans movement because lbgtq people have always been culturally accepted. That doesn’t have anything to do with biology. People in that culture accept gay people, people in other cultures don’t. There are penises and vaginas in both cultures.
You are taking about sex. Others are talking about gender. They're no longer synonymous and haven't been for at least 70 years.No, they are synonymous. I’ll pose the same question to you Mr Gristle, when should we expect your first tranny review? According to you, a person isn’t a male even tho they have a cock. You can just except their word that they identify as a female. Go for it. Let us know how it worked out. Me thinks you already have. There’s nothing wrong with that. You can rationalize what you want to.
As a result you're talking past each other and arguing biology when no one's questioning the biology, except in some rare cases. Instead, the sociology. Originally Posted by HDGristle