Tesla vs Looney Tunes

They’re not vandals, they’re domestic terrorists and should be treated as such. Straight to gitmo, freak.

https://www.theverge.com/news/634130...est-cybertruck

Elmo must be loving the test data from people replicating this experiment. This Cybercuck driver had to jam on the brakes in his Y while his Cuck detected the wall.

Since no one posting here so far has or is buying a Tesla this is for the lurkers.

Make sure your FSD is fully upgraded and avoid cartoon walls

The jokes on you!!!

https://x.com/onebaddude_/status/190...790908110?s=42

Libtards are Retards

You guys are awfully concerned about running into walls painted like the road. I drive a ton and have never run across this particular issue. The inability to distinguish this is of no concern, at least to me, when buying a car, be it a Tesla or any other model.

If you don't understand why visual only is a poor choice, be glad you don't own a Tesla.

Remember that Musk made that call over tbe objections of his lead engineers

Let's also recall how non-transparent they have been with crash data. This will matter with his automated taxis.

Yeah, I’ll thank my lucky stars next time someone paints a billboard like it’s part of the road.

Not shocking when the willful blindness kicks in. It's ok, tho

https://www.thestreet.com/electric-v...-inspired-test

So the Tesla stopped for a kid in the road, an example of something which might actually happen, but not a fake road which wouldn’t. Oh, the horror.

You found the confirmation bias bait but disregarded the holes in the cameras only model, as expected.

Bias? LMAO! You ate up a story akin to Eskimos getting attacked by alligators because you don’t like someone’s politics.

This isn't about politics, J. It's about a conscious choice not to use lidar in a vehicle that's supposed to be able to drive itself

All I'm going to say is that lawyers are already having a field day going after both the owner, driver and manufacturer of any vehicle that even infers vaguely that a car contains even a limited amount of self driving features. Even if only for self activating braking.

This isn't about politics, J. It's about a conscious choice not to use lidar in a vehicle that's supposed to be able to drive itself Originally Posted by HDGristle

Of course it is, otherwise you wouldn’t give AF.

Of course it is, otherwise you wouldn’t give AF. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Wrong again, J. Thanks for the bump

https://driveteslacanada.ca/news/mar...milar-results/

Very entertaining