riots in Los Angeles use of National Guard

The current LA riots is a perfect example of subterfuge. A movement that has been co-opted or hijacked to bring about a specific result. But notice how no illegal immigrants are at the events. Just Americans LMFAO!!! Y'all are being played. The paid professional protestors got paid, the meida was there in lockstep to co-opt/hijack and spread the deceit via social media. It works like a charm everytime. Originally Posted by CPT Savajo

... Too right, mate!

Read some o' the liberal posts here - they want the
National guard OUT... But WHY?? ... So the car burnings
and lootings can continue?? ...

#### Salty

How many bricks have to be thrown, cars burned, stores looted, property destroyed and Law Enforcement personnel injured before the “Demonstrations” become serious enough to warrant National Guard intervention.?
One isn't enough? How about five? Ten.

Have any of you listened to the interviews with some of the Demonstrators. Many are actually believing that California rightly belongs to Mexico.
One Hispanic Demonstrator, probably was in his forties, told a reporter that he believed the US should have a Government similar to the Soviet Unions. Originally Posted by Jacky S

... It's almost as-if the liberal lads here WANT the chaos
destruction and lootings to Continue...

"The National Guard and Marines have no place in
local or Federal law enforcement" --- Ye Christ! ...

#### Salty

How many bricks have to be thrown, cars burned, stores looted, property destroyed and Law Enforcement personnel injured before the “Demonstrations” become serious enough to warrant National Guard intervention.?
One isn't enough? How about five? Ten.... Originally Posted by Jacky S

Ridiculous question. There is no specific number of these types of incidents that triggers this.

There are laws that cover when Troops can be brought in. Trump doesn't care. This is just an excuse for him to do it. And you and the other Trump sycophants who are so willing to allow him to compromise the law and civil rights are going to support him. You seem to value your support of him more than the law and Civil rights.

.

Ridiculous question. There is no specific number of these types of incidents that triggers this.

There are laws that cover when Troops can be brought in. Trump doesn't care. This is just an excuse for him to do it. And you and the other Trump sycophants who are so willing to allow him to compromise the law and civil rights are going to support him. You seem to value your support of him more than the law and Civil rights.

. Originally Posted by rooster

... Hmmmmm... So, President Trump having the National Guard
come in to help quell the violence is violating Civil Rights??

Blimey! ... That's a new one.

... I, for one - didn't know that people have Civil Rights
to torch cars, throw rocks at police and loot shoppes.

... I surely DO learn something new every day in this forum.

#### Salty

... Too right, mate!

Read some o' the liberal posts here - they want the
National guard OUT... But WHY?? ... So the car burnings
and lootings can continue?? ...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

... It's almost as-if the liberal lads here WANT the chaos
destruction and lootings to Continue...

"The National Guard and Marines have no place in
local or Federal law enforcement" --- Ye Christ! ...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Whatta surprise that you would still throw down with those two like they said something legit after I fuggin destroyed both of them here.

But this is an interesting tactic by you. Now you say "It's almost as if..."

Like that makes a difference. Thankfully you kept the happy emoji though!

All of you know damn well that no "fucking lib" posting here is advocating violence. Or opposing legitimate law enforcement. Legitimate is the key word.

You boyz never met a Trump exaggeration that you didn't like. And never question your support. Not healthy.

.

Many of the Left Leaning Posters on this Forum are, ( probably unknowingly), stating ideals right out of the Saul Lewinsky playbook.

That is pathetic, irrelevant....and desperate AF.

(off topic too!)

.

Also, I love the way all of our leftist friends keep quoting the 1st Amendment, conveniently leaving out the “peaceably” part.

But then, TDS does that to people.

Look at the leftists here defending criminal illegals and others attacking federal agents who are doing their job. Stopping hard working Americans from going to work (not that the left knows what gainful employment means). Too bad for you losers that 60% of the country AGREES with Trump doing this. California abdicated their responsibility by ordering cops to stand down and allow this shit to happen. So Trump has every right to protect federal agents and federal property.

... Hmmmmm... So, President Trump having the National Guard
come in to help quell the violence is violating Civil Rights??

Blimey! ... That's a new one.

... I, for one - didn't know that people have Civil Rights
to torch cars, throw rocks at police and loot shoppes.

... I surely DO learn something new every day in this forum.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Again with the simplistic misrepresentations and intentional obtuseness.

Yes, using troops to police civilians is a violation of law and the Constitution, except in very limited situations. This one is being exaggerated to make it look so.

And....sigh....no one here said there is a right to be violent.

This willingness to accede these rights so quickly is mind-boggling. Sieg-fucki-Heil.

.

Many of the Left Leaning Posters on this Forum are, ( probably unknowingly), stating ideals right out of the Saul Lewinsky playbook. Originally Posted by Jacky S

... Yes, I surely do see what you mean there, mate.

Olde Saul's own playbook states something or other
about COMPLAINING LOUDLY if the National Guard or
the military is brought in to calm a situation.

Might be on page 26...

#### Salty

Desperate. Pathetic. Divisive.

I'm out.

You two Patriots can jerk each other for the rest of the evening. Enjoy!

.

Yes, we will enjoy the National Guard rightly putting down illegal riots. No matter how much the left cries about it.

Look at the leftists here defending criminal illegals and others attacking federal agents who are doing their job. Stopping hard working Americans from going to work (not that the left knows what gainful employment means). Too bad for you losers that 60% of the country AGREES with Trump doing this. California abdicated their responsibility by ordering cops to stand down and allow this shit to happen. So Trump has every right to protect federal agents and federal property. Originally Posted by Lantern2814

Oh...what the hell. I've got time for one more!

Hey lantern. 'Sup?

Oh. Ummmm. We didn't defend anyone committing violence. Or "criminal illegals" (just WTF...IS...that?)

But you are absolutely right that the Left has no idea what gainful employment is. You know us. We just want loose shoes, tight pussy, and a warm place to shit.

We agree that we are losers too.

Thanks for not letting this get personal.

Love,

The Leftists

(still not an insult for anyone that actually understands it)

.

Yes, we will enjoy the National Guard rightly putting down illegal riots. No matter how much the left cries about it. Originally Posted by Lantern2814

And the jerking! Don't forget the jerking!

(sorry if I am interrupting it)

.