Yes, it WAS a great job and ruling. Telling district Court judges to stay in their lane and that they can't make national rulings. As they were always supposed to do. But the leftists here can't understand that this ruling simply reinforced the way things are supposed to be. As Barrett had to explain in small words to Jackson. Originally Posted by Lantern2814Why did she hve to use small words with Jackson, brother?
- Yssup Rider
- 06-29-2025, 10:36 PM
- txdot-guy
- 06-30-2025, 12:29 PM
does that include a federal district judge with limited jurisdiction issuing a nationwide injunction?Your argument echoes the majority opinion. I just think it’s wrong. Nationwide injunctions simply freeze the executive order until the issue can be decided by the courts. Because executive orders frozen by nationwide injunctions are usually appealed further up the judicial system until a final ruling can be reached.
that's what the ruling addresses. these judges know their scope is limited yet they attempt to exceed it when it suits their political ideology which is the antithesis of your fair and impartial justice. Yes? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
By removing the power of judges to freeze the system until the issue is settled the country is thrown into chaos whereupon executive orders can be issued in one area and not others.
In this case the executive order changing the system of birth right citizenship has already been struck down as unconstitutional in several states but not all states. Will parents have to go to another state just to be certain that their child is born as a citizen? How fucked up is that?
- Lantern2814
- 06-30-2025, 03:34 PM
- Salty Again
- 06-30-2025, 09:15 PM
Your argument echoes the majority opinion. I just think it’s wrong. Nationwide injunctions simply freeze the executive order until the issue can be decided by the courts. Because executive orders frozen by nationwide injunctions are usually appealed further up the judicial system until a final ruling can be reached.
By removing the power of judges to freeze the system until the issue is settled the country is thrown into chaos whereupon executive orders can be issued in one area and not others.
In this case the executive order changing the system of birth right citizenship has already been struck down as unconstitutional in several states but not all states. Will parents have to go to another state just to be certain that their child is born as a citizen? How fucked up is that? Originally Posted by txdot-guy
.. But why should a lone judge in Maryland, California or even
Podunk be able to freeze things with a NATIONWIDE injunction?
THAT is what's silly - and I'm GLAD to see the SCOTUS stop it!
#### Salty
- Yssup Rider
- 06-30-2025, 10:45 PM
Do you understand how these things work, Salty?
You apparently support unchecked executive power.
Oh the places the investigations will go.
You apparently support unchecked executive power.
Oh the places the investigations will go.
- Yssup Rider
- 06-30-2025, 10:46 PM
- txdot-guy
- 06-30-2025, 11:28 PM
.. But why should a lone judge in Maryland, California or evenI’m just of the opinion that it is better to keep to the status quo until a final decision can be reached instead of the chaos that results from having different states have different rulings.
Podunk be able to freeze things with a NATIONWIDE injunction?
THAT is what's silly - and I'm GLAD to see the SCOTUS stop it!
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
The Supreme Court is enabling chaos across the country for no reason that I can see.
- Yssup Rider
- 07-01-2025, 08:02 AM
I see a reason txdot.
The court is made in Trumps image to do his will.
Never more proof than this.
The court is made in Trumps image to do his will.
Never more proof than this.
- Lantern2814
- 07-01-2025, 03:36 PM
- Precious_b
- 07-03-2025, 07:51 PM
These aren't WINS. They are court judgements.
And the the 2nd one doesn't even discuss the issue Trump wants. It discusses procedures among the courts. Originally Posted by VitaMan
... Surely looks like WINNINGLooks are deceiving, oh salty one. Your eyes are the most easily fooled sense. If it were truly a win, than a ruling that states birth right citizenship is herein revoked.- to me! ..
..
##### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Don't *see* that.
MAGAs are not interested in democracy. Their reason for MAGA-ism is born of their apparent belief that an untouchable Trump makes them untouchable, thereby not having to worry about “lesser” individuals and “invaders” being allowed a chance to share the country with them… unlike their grandparents, possibly parents, who WERE those undesirables.
That’s why they march behind Don Snoreleone.
This is further proof. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Yupper.
Pretty much nails it....
(now we get to see alla the responses rationalizing that "my grandparents came here legally, goddamit!" ...While ignoring how oppressed they often were, how much they were demonized and discriminated against)
. Originally Posted by rooster
.. But why should a lone judge in Maryland, California or evenRead what they posted above your quote here.
Podunk be able to freeze things with a NATIONWIDE injunction?
THAT is what's silly - and I'm GLAD to see the SCOTUS stop it!
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Read it again.
Than let it sink in.
Hint: SCOTUS has a ruling in place that has stood for over a hundred years.
Do you understand how these things work, Salty?Ol Salty is relying on the biased actions of donnys brownshirts in enforcing the deportations he wants.
You apparently support unchecked executive power.
Oh the places the investigations will go. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You'll hear him cry when Homeland Security "fairly" applies these corrupt believes of the maggies when they start kicking out the illegal Irish immigrants in Boston. The ruskies in Brighton Beach. Italians from Bensonhurst. He'll have to worry when they start kicking the dingos out of Nolita