Trump weaponized DOJ on display

Is Trump opening investigations? Or is that the DOJ after a criminal referral from the NSC? And the little or no evidence... what do you call the VERY memos detailing the illegal activity? Do you think the Trump White house or Gabbard forged those documents? Originally Posted by texassapper

... It's ALL the liberals have, mate - their HATRED of Trump.

They call it "weaponized DOJ" when Republicans are in charge.

Their HATRED of Trump surely has them looking away
from the whistleblowers, e-mails, memoes, and texts
that detail all the corruption and lawbreaking.

... And it's their HATRED of Trump that blames Him
for their so-called "weaponization"...

... So, Trump isn't just WINNING - He's WON! ... ...

##### Salty

Is Trump opening investigations? Or is that the DOJ after a criminal referral from the NSC? And the little or no evidence... what do you call the VERY memos detailing the illegal activity? Do you think the Trump White house or Gabbard forged those documents? Originally Posted by texassapper

You don’t think that the people running the DOJ and the NSC aren’t being pressured into doing this. People get fired and ostracized in the MAGA crowd if they don’t do as El Schitzenpants wants them to.

And the documents you refer to are of an unknown provenance. They have the legal right to open an investigation but it’s clear to many people in the country that the motivation is nothing more than revenge.

And Trump deserves to enact some revenge.

Not at the expense of American democracy.


As for Salty's demonstrative of WINNING and WON.......Trump has already called the people subpoenaed "GUILTY" of treason. How is that for winning......the investigation is just opened.....no grand jury.....nothing said about a jury trial.


That is the kind of statement an evil dictator would make....not an American President. There is no winning in that statement.

Not at the expense of American democracy. Originally Posted by VitaMan

The blame there belongs SQUARELY on Obama and his attempt to thwart the will of the American electorate.

You libs whine about Democracy, but don't seem to care when your political leaders do undemocratic things.

Is sabotaging the follow on administration democracy?

Not at the expense of American democracy.


As for Salty's demonstrative of WINNING and WON.......Trump has already called the people subpoenaed "GUILTY" of treason. How is that for winning......the investigation is just opened.....no grand jury.....nothing said about a jury trial.


That is the kind of statement an evil dictator would make....not an American President. There is no winning in that statement. Originally Posted by VitaMan

And the Dems have repeatedly called Trump Hitler and said he was "GUILTY" of Russian collusion.

Vitaman,
I don't have time to research it but I doubt very seriously that you or any other libs were so concerned about due process when biden said the border patrol agents would be punished for whipping the Hatian migrants.

Vitaman,
I don't have time to research it but I doubt very seriously that you or any other libs were so concerned about due process when biden said the border patrol agents would be punished for whipping the Hatian migrants.

This is the President of the United States making that statement.


Think about that.

Think about what? Biden convicting the agents before any evidence? Oh wait, there was evidence proving they did nothing wrong but why let that stop him.

Do you want to discuss Biden era events ? Please provide the details.

But since this is a thread about Trump weaponizing the DOJ and calling those subpoenaed "GUILTY", you may want to start your own thread.

This is the President of the United States making that statement.


Think about that. Originally Posted by VitaMan

... The President of the United States - OBama -
spyed on candidate Trump's campaign - lied to the
FISA Court to be able to do it - peddled the phony
"Russian Collusion" dossier as Fact - and then
tryed to scare President-Elect Trump into resigning.

... You think about THAT.

#### Salty

Have you thought about Trump calling the subpoenaed individuals "GUILTY" of treason ?

Still waiting

By the way the Russian dossier was not peddled as fact. It arrived ar a late stage in the preparation of the 2017 report. Two agencies were involved. One wanted it included in the report, the other did not.

They compromised by including it in the report but "unverified".

Get your facts correct or don't post at all

To remind you this thread is not about Russia. There is another active thread where you can discuss that.

That’s hilarious. If your intent was sarcasm or being facetious you did a great job. Most will take you seriously so you might want to add an emoji or something. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Thank you for that.

For the sake of clarity then: My remarks in post #21 are dead serious.

I am convinced that the Trump administration's DOJ will eventually prove cases of m mortgage fraud against at least two celebrity Democrats. It can be argued that financial wrong doing is not rise to the level of "crime against the State", but one of the actors seems to have declared his primary residence to be outside the state he represents . . .which seems more serious than just citing on a loan to me.

There will probably be other legal actions that will move forward as well. The Russia-gate fraud is, in my opinion, a more serious issue. Former President Obama may be in the clear with presidential immunity, but others may not be able to dodge the DOJ.

I feel that these issues and others are more likely to be founded on evidence that is more genuine and founded in fact than anything brought forward in either of the impeachment proceedings against President Trump . . .or the other court actions brought against him.

This is to sarcasm.

Do you want to discuss Biden era events ? Please provide the details.

But since this is a thread about Trump weaponizing the DOJ and calling those subpoenaed "GUILTY", you may want to start your own thread. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Just trying to give you some prospective to soothe your fake outrage.