Trump wants to take guns away from Transgender Americans, but...

To put it simply, how can you cry for a ban on evil black rifles, and then protect the person who used it to carry out murder?

That wouldn't happen to a white CIS gender shooter, so, why jump to protect the right to own an ASSAULT RIFLE, and commit murder if you are anyone other than a CIS gender white guy?

One statistic that nobody cites, like, 20 million white guys own AR 15s, but, none of them shoot up schools, yet, multiple Trans people have used their ARs to commit murder?

Let say one million trans in this country, how many total ARs do they own, 1000? 10,000, what stat shows the overall gun ownership numbers vs, the amount of rifles they own, and then the numbers of ARs used in crime by each group.

What you are going to find is, statisticly, so few ARs are used in crime, and that the crime rate by each group, is going to show that an inordinant number of Trans people are using THEIR rifles to commit crimes with them at a higher rate.

Which has been the entire point of the conversation.

You’re missing the point. If the point of taking firearms away from transgender people is to prevent mass gun violence you would have better results taking firearms away from all males in general. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Oh, I just remembered, this last shooter was white guy, so, yes, removing guns from white people would have stopped him.

Good point, but, I don't think you intended to ever treat the shooter as a white guy, because he was really a white something OTHER, than a white guy.

So, by your LOGIC, all us white guys have to do is become Trans racial, and since I believe I'm a black women, then WE are OK to have guns?

And, you have hung yourself on your own insane logic.



For the record, when I go to the store, I park in the Pregnant lady spot, because I want some KAREN to chastise me for parking there, and when inevitably one does speak up, I am telling her I identify as a pregnant Lesbian.

I’m not the one saying that we should take guns away from anyone. Trump and some of the misguided on this board are. I’m just trying to point out the absurdity of his argument. But some people seem to be too thick to understand the point.

It’s all kabuki theater. Banning the AR platform will have an immeasurably small, if any, effect on gun crime. Banning handguns might do something, good luck getting it done tho.

How many trans shooters should there be? Zero.


How many gay shooters should there be? Zero.


How many black shooters should there be? Zero.


How many white shooters should there be? Well, please explain....

Ona can you do that math thing again where you show us white people are less of a problem as it relates to # of mass shooters based on their % of the overall population?

Thank you in advance.

How many trans shooters should there be? Zero.


How many gay shooters should there be? Zero.


How many black shooters should there be? Zero.


How many white shooters should there be? Well, please explain.... Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

You seem very vague on what things mean lately, understanding what Chipocalypse means, now the number of white people who should be, sic, "Shooters".

Well in an ideal world nobody would need to defend themselves from an attack by another human, and have to use ANY type of weapon.

Unfortunately, that world isn't the one we live in.

I read a local women who was 102 years old was killed in a vehicular accident.

How sad, to live that long and die in an accident.

Have any of you ever considered how the lefts attempts to save people ends up being the price they have to pay to be a Democrat?

Inner city projects for example, the most crime occurs there.

And, before you disagree, how many years did you work in them?