Captain Crazy blows up the leadership from Iran and that Iranians need to take control of the leadership.. what if they can't? What if the current administration is holds up in a few places to stop an overthrow of the current government?

Khamenei, one of the most evil people in History, is dead. This is not only Justice for the people of Iran, but for all Great Americans, and those people from many Countries throughout the World, that have been killed or mutilated by Khamenei and his gang of bloodthirsty THUGS. He was unable to avoid our Intelligence and Highly Sophisticated Tracking Systems and, blah blah blah more stupid shit. Originally Posted by bambino
It's hilarious how the MAGAs love this shit when all they did was bitch and moan about WW3 if the dems got elected. If the above bolded is the only reason to attack another country then dipshit orange man has his work cut out for him.

MAGA has zero consistency beyond the wild need to suck trump's cock.

BTW - didn't he already say he "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capability? Everyone forget that? So what's he attacking them for now?
lustylad's Avatar
bambino's Avatar
Where's the OP? Is he sober yet? He started this thread at 5am with a drunken rant!




Hmm... I think I would have to be very drunk to copulate with Iran!




I agree! I might be able to handle guerillas, but those damn gorillas frighten the hell out of me! Originally Posted by lustylad
That there’s some funny shit. I think Eye has the record for the longest incoherent Thread title in ECCIE history!!!!!
bambino's Avatar
It's hilarious how the MAGAs love this shit when all they did was bitch and moan about WW3 if the dems got elected. If the above bolded is the only reason to attack another country then dipshit orange man has his work cut out for him.

MAGA has zero consistency beyond the wild need to suck trump's cock.

BTW - didn't he already say he "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capability? Everyone forget that? So what's he attacking them for now? Originally Posted by fd-guy
Well, they’re still the largest State sponsor of terrorism and they just executed 32,000 of their own people mebbe it’s time for regime change. Doncha think the Iranian people are begging for it? You’ve been schooled. Class is dismissed.
Well, they’re still the largest State sponsor of terrorism and they just executed 32,000 of their own people mebbe it’s time for regime change. Doncha think the Iranian people are begging for it? You’ve been schooled. Class is dismissed. Originally Posted by bambino

Where do you get that they're the largest? So north korea has killed way more than that, and hell, the shit that's happened in Africa makes Iran look like choir boys. So professor, while you're inventing shit, are we going there next?
Vladi, HAS, nukes!
Vladi is a proven threat to world order!
Vladi's killed and maimed 100s of 1000's in Ukraine!
Why doesn't Donnie takeout Vladi and decapitate his regime?
(There appears to be (a politically-influenced) double standard here!)
While we're at it ...why don't we take out Kim Jung-un he's got an arsenal of ballistic missiles...he kills and represses his own people!
Jacuzzme's Avatar
You think toppling the mullahs has nothing to do with Russia and China? lol
bambino's Avatar
Where do you get that they're the largest? So north korea has killed way more than that, and hell, the shit that's happened in Africa makes Iran look like choir boys. So professor, while you're inventing shit, are we going there next? Originally Posted by fd-guy
https://www.iranintl.com/en/202412132588

I guess you’re another one who enjoys being wrong…………. Everytime.
bambino's Avatar
It appears the only people upset about Khamenei being taken out, are the brainwashed American Leftists and anti-Trumpers.

The Iranian People are celebrating in the streets, while blue-haired baristas and Libertarian podcasters throw a fit.

All they know how to do is hate Trump.
bambino's Avatar
Remember when Obama casually sent Iran $1.7 BILLION in cash stacked on pallets in the back of a military plane and were told that it was for some deal a long time ago and that we owed it to them?

Could you imagine if President Trump sent billions in cash to Iran? How much longer is it going to take to figure out that the media lied and gaslit you for years about almost everything? Wait until you understand what the money was really for.

All roads lead to Obama. It's time to wake up.
Remember when Obama casually sent Iran $1.7 BILLION in cash stacked on pallets in the back of a military plane and were told that it was for some deal a long time ago and that we owed it to them?

Could you imagine if President Trump sent billions in cash to Iran? How much longer is it going to take to figure out that the media lied and gaslit you for years about almost everything? Wait until you understand what the money was really for.

All roads lead to Obama. It's time to wake up. Originally Posted by bambino
Ah yes, the dramatic ‘pallets of cash’ scene — very cinematic. In reality, it was a settlement over $400 million Iran paid the U.S. in the 1970s for military equipment it never received, plus negotiated interest after 35 years of arbitration at the Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal. You can debate the timing, but pretending it was a random $1.7B giveaway just skips the inconvenient history.


LOL. You should wake up, or just go back to sleep. Schools out.
Jacuzzme's Avatar
Normal people, or governments for that matter, don’t pay for things with 400 million in cash. That amount of money is nearly ALWAYS an electronic transfer of some sort, although there may be some crazy case of a cashiers check or something of that nature. Saying that flying a pallet of cash to a hostile foreign government is incredibly sketchy is an insult to things that are incredibly sketchy.
Normal people, or governments for that matter, don’t pay for things with 400 million in cash. That amount of money is nearly ALWAYS an electronic transfer of some sort, although there may be some crazy case of a cashiers check or something of that nature. Saying that flying a pallet of cash to a hostile foreign government is incredibly sketchy is an insult to things that are incredibly sketchy. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Of course governments don’t normally move $400 million in physical cash. They also don’t normally operate under sanctions that block electronic transfers. That’s kind of the point.

It looks dramatic because ‘pallets of cash’ is a great headline. But the method of delivery doesn’t magically turn a decades-old legal settlement of pre-1979 funds into a secret bribe. Optics aren’t evidence.

If there were proof it was illegal, there’d be charges — not just adjectives like ‘sketchy.
lustylad's Avatar
You're missing the point, fd-guy.

Why did the Iranians demand a big chunk of the Obama settlement funds to be delivered in banknotes? The answer is obvious - to pay off their terrorist brethren in Hezbollah, Hamas, Yemen, Damascus etc. Most terrorists don't do bank transfers lol.

By requesting those pallets of cash, the Iranians were telegraphing their intent to keep stirring up shit all over the Middle East. What's unbelievable is that Obama cravenly said "ok - fine!" He didn't even have the backbone to say no fucking way - bank transfers only, I'm not going to finance & facilitate your terrorism even more openly & directly by flying in pallets of cash!
You're missing the point, fd-guy.

Why did the Iranians demand a big chunk of the Obama settlement funds to be delivered in banknotes? The answer is obvious - to pay off their terrorist brethren in Hezbollah, Hamas, Yemen, Damascus etc. Most terrorists don't do bank transfers lol.

By requesting those pallets of cash, the Iranians were telegraphing their intent to keep stirring up shit all over the Middle East. What's unbelievable is that Obama cravenly said "ok - fine!" He didn't even have the backbone to say no fucking way - bank transfers only, I'm not going to finance & facilitate your terrorism even more openly & directly by flying in pallets of cash! Originally Posted by lustylad
I think you’re inferring a lot from the delivery method.

Iran was under heavy banking sanctions at the time, which limited how funds could move through normal electronic channels. That’s why the settlement was paid in foreign currency cash instead of a standard U.S. bank transfer. You can definitely argue that it looked bad or sent the wrong message — that’s fair.

But jumping from ‘they wanted cash’ to ‘this was obviously to fund Hezbollah and Hamas’ assumes intent that hasn’t been demonstrated. If there were direct evidence that this specific settlement payment was routed to terrorist groups, that would be a documented intelligence finding, not just something we’re piecing together from optics.

It’s one thing to criticize the decision. It’s another to treat a suspicion as settled fact.