Review: The session that almost was.

Okay Laney and Sixx...save your swords for a different thread

While I have no stake in either party, I will say this: if a provider has guidelines, rules, or anything of the like - then she is absolutely within her right to cancel a session that does not fit within those parameters. Forgive me, or don't - actually don't forgive me at all - but if a lady is not comfortable with "X" "Y" "Z" of the alphabet soup, the she is within her right to defer the appointment. Personally, I never engage myself in an encounter that isn't going to be mutually pleasurable. What is the point? If I am not getting off then why would I put myself in said situation in the first place? I think the provider in question is within her right to cancel a session that isn't going to pan out to her liking. Gentleman: how much fun would it be to put your cock into a lady that isn't enjoying herself. Forgive my rude verbiage, but sex should be enjoyable for all parties involved. How many of you have complained about diddling a "dead starfish"? It just sounds like a waste of everyone's time..

Spin it how you like; personally, I believe a lady is within her right to dictate what is and is not on the menu. If the asking man is not okay with what is being offered then take your fishing pole to the next pond!

Just a brief rant. Let's keep this on topic, folks. Keep the sword fighting and ninja garb within it's own thread

there is no need for name calling.
You can disagree without that.

...Personally, I never engage myself in an encounter that isn't going to be mutually pleasurable. What is the point? If I am not getting off then why would I put myself in said situation in the first place? I think the provider in question is within her right to cancel a session that isn't going to pan out to her liking. Gentleman: how much fun would it be to put your cock into a lady that isn't enjoying herself. Forgive my rude verbiage, but sex should be enjoyable for all parties involved. How many of you have complained about diddling a "dead starfish"? It just sounds like a waste of everyone's time..

.....I believe a lady is within her right to dictate what is and is not on the menu. Originally Posted by klovve

Okay Laney and Sixx...save your swords for a different thread

While I have no stake in either party, I will say this: if a provider has guidelines, rules, or anything of the like - then she is absolutely within her right to cancel a session that does not fit within those parameters. Forgive me, or don't - actually don't forgive me at all - but if a lady is not comfortable with "X" "Y" "Z" of the alphabet soup, the she is within her right to defer the appointment. Personally, I never engage myself in an encounter that isn't going to be mutually pleasurable. What is the point? If I am not getting off then why would I put myself in said situation in the first place? I think the provider in question is within her right to cancel a session that isn't going to pan out to her liking. Gentleman: how much fun would it be to put your cock into a lady that isn't enjoying herself. Forgive my rude verbiage, but sex should be enjoyable for all parties involved. How many of you have complained about diddling a "dead starfish"? It just sounds like a waste of everyone's time..

Spin it how you like; personally, I believe a lady is within her right to dictate what is and is not on the menu. If the asking man is not okay with what is being offered then take your fishing pole to the next pond!

Just a brief rant. Let's keep this on topic, folks. Keep the sword fighting and ninja garb within it's own thread Originally Posted by klovve

My comments had nothing to do with her issues with this guy. I could care less what they are bickering about. She should have handled herself better. Calling him a loser and douchebag, etc isn't a good thing. If she wants to vent, maybe she should utilize the powder room, etc. She edited her comments Kelli. I think you missed that..

btw... nice avatar

sixx

You are right, I didn't catch the name calling. Inappropriate

And thanks Sixx..!

Okay Laney and Sixx...save your swords for a different thread

While I have no stake in either party, I will say this: if a provider has guidelines, rules, or anything of the like - then she is absolutely within her right to cancel a session that does not fit within those parameters. Forgive me, or don't - actually don't forgive me at all - but if a lady is not comfortable with "X" "Y" "Z" of the alphabet soup, the she is within her right to defer the appointment. Personally, I never engage myself in an encounter that isn't going to be mutually pleasurable. What is the point? If I am not getting off then why would I put myself in said situation in the first place? I think the provider in question is within her right to cancel a session that isn't going to pan out to her liking. Gentleman: how much fun would it be to put your cock into a lady that isn't enjoying herself. Forgive my rude verbiage, but sex should be enjoyable for all parties involved. How many of you have complained about diddling a "dead starfish"? It just sounds like a waste of everyone's time..

Spin it how you like; personally, I believe a lady is within her right to dictate what is and is not on the menu. If the asking man is not okay with what is being offered then take your fishing pole to the next pond!

Just a brief rant. Let's keep this on topic, folks. Keep the sword fighting and ninja garb within it's own thread Originally Posted by klovve

I would go one step further and say that completely regardless of any espoused guidelines or rules, published, expressed whatever, a provider should never ever be required to do anything at any time. This includes meeting a guy, spending 20 minutes with him, then suddenly deciding right then and there she has just changed her mind and revoking an offered service.

BUT

Given the commercial nature of the transaction, the next question becomes how does this change "the deal". In the case of this thread, I'd subjectively judge that since she told him what she was not up for before he came over, everyone just walks away no harm no foul. If he arrives, spends 20 minutes getting warmed up with the clear expectation of X, then she has a sudden change of heart (my more extreme example), then he's well within his rights to expect to leave without paying, or to ask for a reduced rate. The deal may be legitimately renegotiated once the terms have changed and "pay up and accept it" would not be a reasonable provider position.

But the women's choice to participate in any thing is never ever ever surrendered or this becomes a lot darker than P4P.

I agree. I expressed my opinon simply. Maybe she just should have acknowledged her mistake and "manned" up about it. I am one who can admit when I am wrong. Originally Posted by sixxbach

sixx,

Yes sir, You are quite right..

This luck of mine, Sixxbach right there to see me slip in my moment of weakness. Too late was my correction, Clearly there's just no escaping your watchful eye. lol. I see it did not go unnoticed and I take responsibility for what i said.
I was upset, but your right It was far from classy and I apologize.
I realized it wasnt the best move and I hope there's forgiveness to be found..

Some of these newer providers sure are mouthy. Originally Posted by sixxbach

Mmm...The way you said that was so feisty, Kinda turned me on..lol..

Clearly you know how to get on Sixx's good side