Why was Still Lookings review of Katie Foxx removed?

I am sure it is.......in Dallas.

I am sure it is.......in Dallas. Originally Posted by dearhunter

Post count envy? I haven't seen a non-DFW resident venture in here as much as you since London Rayne.

Here ya go, boys (and girls) http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=367303

There's not a thing wrong with the review, imho. Were the pictures that are no longer there unflattering? Is that what this is really all about?

Just asking, 'cause the review itself is NOT unflattering. Quite the opposite.

But boltfan, I love Dallas......I got two Master's and three PHDs there.......I cut my teeth on providers in your fair city before this was all cool.

Only 3?

Here ya go, boys (and girls) http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=367303

There's not a thing wrong with the review, imho. Were the pictures that are no longer there unflattering? Is that what this is really all about?

Just asking, 'cause the review itself is NOT unflattering. Quite the opposite. Originally Posted by eccienewbie

Didn't she dispute the claim of BBBJCIMNQNS? I think that was the issue.

Here ya go, boys (and girls) http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=367303

There's not a thing wrong with the review, imho. Were the pictures that are no longer there unflattering? Is that what this is really all about?

Just asking, 'cause the review itself is NOT unflattering. Quite the opposite. Originally Posted by eccienewbie

The pic's for both reviews were posted in SL's "look at me thread" in the National co-ed, there is a dispute as to if he did have permission to post them there. It's one of the many pieces of the "he said, she said" drama.

Post count envy? I haven't seen a non-DFW resident venture in here as much as you since London Rayne. Originally Posted by Boltfan

LMAO

Hi I don't usually post in here but I have stayed off this section to avoid the drama but I have to say I am the leading poll to lift SL ban and I am doing it based on what I have seen and the fact in all the drama and horrible things I saw being to said to and about the members here and the fact out of all of it only SL got banned...I hope the higher ups reverse the ban due to fact and I know this for a fact had he known his action that led to his reaching the points that got him banned he never would have done it and the fact there is no where in the guidelines that what he did is a no-no....He adds alot of humor to the board and has always been great to the ladies and yes he has had disagreements with some memebers here but who hasn't....

The whole matter stinks and mostly because of how it was handled by the staff. Too much monkeying with the threads, the reviews, the pics which were actually taken by KF were removed... Were edits actually made to the review?

The Houston boys chiming in are absolutely correct, IMO.



and how many points has Prolongus received for his direct insults and attacks on the guy who actually paid the two session fees and wrote the reviews and has a national thread on his hobby tour?

A huge absence of transparency during this debacle has made the Dallas boards look bad.

St. C. I want someone fired over this. I do not care who.

I agree completely there has been alot of things that are not fair and what appears to be affected by personal issues and alot of behind the scene issues..the higher ups hopefully will realize this and lift his ban ..not only does this make the dallas boards look bad but the whole site the sad part is Texas is where ECCIE is so well known....and another sad thing is there are so many wonderful members and this reflects badly on everyone ....just sayin

The whole matter stinks and mostly because of how it was handled by the staff. Too much monkeying with the threads, the reviews, the pics which were actually taken by KF were removed... Were edits actually made to the review?

The Houston boys chiming in are absolutely correct, IMO.



and how many points has Prolongus received for his direct insults and attacks on the guy who actually paid the two session fees and wrote the reviews and has a national thread on his hobby tour?

A huge absence of transparency during this debacle has made the Dallas boards look bad.

St. C. I want someone fired over this. I do not care who. Originally Posted by J.G. Wentworth

The same knowledge that tells me that johnnybax is an "administrator"......and last time I looked, that is not a "moderator"........welcome the world of reading what you want to see, instead of reading what you see.

Is this common in Dallas? Originally Posted by dearhunter

No, it's called an "inclusive role." All administrators are also moderators.

Maybe you need an example to better comprehend? It's just like all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.

Welcome to the world of understanding what you read.

The whole matter stinks and mostly because of how it was handled by the staff. Too much monkeying with the threads, the reviews, the pics which were actually taken by KF were removed... Were edits actually made to the review?

The Houston boys chiming in are absolutely correct, IMO.



and how many points has Prolongus received for his direct insults and attacks on the guy who actually paid the two session fees and wrote the reviews and has a national thread on his hobby tour?

A huge absence of transparency during this debacle has made the Dallas boards look bad.

St. C. I want someone fired over this. I do not care who. Originally Posted by J.G. Wentworth

I agree 100%



BTW, the review in question is back up, http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=367303

St. C. I want someone fired over this. I do not care who. Originally Posted by J.G. Wentworth

...or at least suspended without pay!

...or at least suspended without pay! Originally Posted by Reese Foster

good one!!