SHARIA RULE OF LAW COMING TO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD...

The judge didn't permit the cop or victim the opportunity to present their case numbnuts (munchman).

But your ok with the judges performance, even though your convinced there is no evidence of wrong in this case. GO FIGURE. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Read my post douche bag.
Reread the article.
Plus, just because you are stupid, I'll lay this out for you real quick.
The cop and the victim are nothing but witnesses in a criminal case. The cop is only a witness to what the "perp" said. Nothing more. The State presents the case.

I don't know where you got "The judge didn't permit the cop or victim the opportunity to present their case" numbnuts. If you read the statement you are so quick to condemn, you will see there is no evidence other than the 2 statements. The prosecuter didn't call the cop because he can only testify to as what he has seen. Without corroborating witnesses, the "victim's" and the cop's statements means no more than the "Perp's".
When there is a lack of evidence, a case is dismissed. The don't hold the trial anyway because dumbfucks like you will ignore the evidence and try to convict based on a youtube video that doesn't show anything.

You just aren't very smart. You can seem to read but it is pointless because you add all kinds of nonexistent content or miss the content that is there. You think too much but not enough in the way that counts.

You wrap yourself in the Constitution but you have no clue what it says or means.

I'll give you a last chance to prove me wrong. Cut and paste the facts that disagree with what I have said. I will admit I'm wrong.

But if you can't......I guess it doesn't mean anything because you are almost always wrong. I guess we will know no one else uses your login.

Skylar, the LDS church doesn't picket funerals, you're thinking of Westboro Baptist Church. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Thanks

So you're saying Jesus is a zombie? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Yeah, everyone who dies and rises again is a zombie in my book. Thanks for asking.

It's beyond you Ekim. Never mind. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

If you can understand it it would be a piece of cake for me.

We get it douchebag, you have no problem with the judge ranting against the victim and siding with the rights And sympathies of the Islamist who attacked the athetist.

Your values are fuckedd up- Its obvious.

Your a loon.

Read my post douche bag.



Reread the article.
Plus, just because you are stupid, I'll lay this out for you real quick.
The cop and the victim are nothing but witnesses in a criminal case. The cop is only a witness to what the "perp" said. Nothing more. The State presents the case.

I don't know where you got "The judge didn't permit the cop or victim the opportunity to present their case" numbnuts. If you read the statement you are so quick to condemn, you will see there is no evidence other than the 2 statements. The prosecuter didn't call the cop because he can only testify to as what he has seen. Without corroborating witnesses, the "victim's" and the cop's statements means no more than the "Perp's".
When there is a lack of evidence, a case is dismissed. The don't hold the trial anyway because dumbfucks like you will ignore the evidence and try to convict based on a youtube video that doesn't show anything.

You just aren't very smart. You can seem to read but it is pointless because you add all kinds of nonexistent content or miss the content that is there. You think too much but not enough in the way that counts.

You wrap yourself in the Constitution but you have no clue what it says or means.

I'll give you a last chance to prove me wrong. Cut and paste the facts that disagree with what I have said. I will admit I'm wrong.

But if you can't......I guess it doesn't mean anything because you are almost always wrong. I guess we will know no one else uses your login. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

If you can understand it it would be a piece of cake for me. Originally Posted by ekim008

If it was such a 'piece of cake' for you, you'd already understand . . . but you don't.

What video? If there was one, it would have been on that website.
He admitted grabbing a fake beard and the sign. Get over it. Why did it go to court?

The judge was not far off the mark in what he said but he had no place using it as justification for dismissing the charges.
As to his guilt, they have to prove he commited harrasment. I don't know the specifics of that there. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I guess you can't read.

It went to court because the police officer on the scene issued a citation !

The TV clip interviews the cop and he expresses suprise that the judge dismissed the case because of the overwhelming evidence of the assault, including a video There you go, wearing your fake or misplaced rage along with your ignorance of the basic principles of our legal system. What overwhelming evidence? The only video they had was the one they showed on TV.

There was video recordings of the . assult that the judge had but didn't want to view to determine the validity of the officer's charge.

It is all in the post and link. You just didn't want to read, I understand. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Of course you understand someone not wanting to read. You live that every day. Those of us who like to read can't find what you say is in there. Big people point out facts that support their statements. You don't.

Now I know.
Here is the statute.

How typical you would judge before reading it.

http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/c...7.009.000.html

Strange the guy relied on a video that wasn't introduced (no proof one exists) in the case. Where were all of the witnesses that had to have seen everything?
He didn't have even 1? They walked in the parade together till they found the cop. He didn't get any names?

Just because they don't believe in God doesn't mean they are willing to lie in court. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

All good questions. I should ask why the cop expected a different outcome when he did no police work to collect any "overwhelming evidence" or a single statement from a single witness.

Ok; Munchman we get it. You are on side with the perp and judge who thought it was judical to lecture the victim on the niceities of Islam and tolerance, while letting the perpetrator of the attack go without his due lecture on the Constitution and Bill of Rights !

It must feel all warm and cozy to be so fucking enlightened and worldly. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Why do you care if anyone gets a lecture on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Your actions and words ignore both in this thread alone (never mind you are the always the first person to convict someone through the media, without facts or a trial). You’re just pissed because you can't back anything you've said. I stand by what I've said and just because you are slow doesn't change what I said.
I'm not on anybody's side. I'm against you. And yes that is a cop-out on my part but only because it's so easy to prove you wrong.

What video? The one they showed on TV showed nothing. If there was a video, where is the link?
What evidence? Why no witnesses? He admitted grabbing the sign and the fake beard. The statute states he must "strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects the
other person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to
do the same;"
The cop saw nothing. Why didn't he get any witnesses? Or statements?
Again, what evidence? Over or underwhelming? They had 2 statements. They disagreed.

PS Like I give a shit about this. Just playing devil’s advocate this time. Besides, you don’t think the attorney fee taught the alleged perp anything?

Good men know when something needs to be done. And good men don’t judge other men when they don’t have all the facts.
Good men don't have to be told anything by bystanders.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I know that you can't answer any of these questions. So I won't ask you.

Not as warm and fuzzy as someone who can't read or think.
Or as someone who claims to love the Constitution, except when it gets in their way.
Reread my posts, douche bag. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

The above post is well worth repeating to you.

The judge didn't permit the cop or victim the opportunity to present their case numbnuts (munchman).

But your ok with the judges performance, even though your convinced there is no evidence of wrong in this case. GO FIGURE. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I never said there was no evidence. I said there was no evidence presented in the story. We both read the same story. Since there is no evidence presented or discussed (other than a video that shows nothing and you hear 5 or 6 words, none threatening) the case should be dismissed. That's what the Constitution says in my America. You have lived here your whole life and you still don't know the principles our country is based on. You obviously miss the irony of you having to side with a fat atheist and a fat lazy cop while ignoring our Constitution to prove that once again you lead with your chin, not your brain.

Read my post douche bag.
Reread the article.
Plus, just because you are stupid, I'll lay this out for you real quick.
The cop and the victim are nothing but witnesses in a criminal case. The cop is only a witness to what the "perp" said. Nothing more. The State presents the case.

I don't know where you got "The judge didn't permit the cop or victim the opportunity to present their case" numbnuts. If you read the statement you are so quick to condemn, you will see there is no evidence other than the 2 statements. The prosecuter didn't call the cop because he can only testify to as what he has seen. Without corroborating witnesses, the "victim's" and the cop's statements means no more than the "Perp's".
When there is a lack of evidence, a case is dismissed. The don't hold the trial anyway because dumbfucks like you will ignore the evidence and try to convict based on a youtube video that doesn't show anything.

You just aren't very smart. You can seem to read but it is pointless because you add all kinds of nonexistent content or miss the content that is there. You think too much but not enough in the way that counts.

You wrap yourself in the Constitution but you have no clue what it says or means.

I'll give you a last chance to prove me wrong. Cut and paste the facts that disagree with what I have said. I will admit I'm wrong.

But if you can't......I guess it doesn't mean anything because you are almost always wrong. I guess we will know no one else uses your login. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Read, Reflect, Repeat.

We get it douchebag, you have no problem with the judge ranting against the victim and siding with the rights And sympathies of the Islamist who attacked the athetist.

Your values are fuckedd up- Its obvious.

Your a loon. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Not only are my values better than yours, mine don't change because of the religion, the race, or the social level of the accused. You could change any of the people in this story and I'd still say the same thing.

Unlike someone such as yourself.

Not because I'm enlightened and worldly, because I'm an American.

(Unfortunately since you have no history of service to our country and because you have never displayed any type of grasp, be it intellectual or intuitive, I'm not going to waste my time explaining it. You'll have to fall back on the belief I don't know what I'm talking about.)

LOL, Mouthmonster is having a conversation with himself.

If it was such a 'piece of cake' for you, you'd already understand . . . but you don't.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Apparently was in another thread,and I didn't read it dense as hell.If you don't understand something keep quiet so your ignorance won't show.

LOL, Mouthmonster is having a conversation with himself. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Obviously.
You couldn't read your own link. How would you read mine?

And now you are off subject. A douche bag till the end.

Apparently was in another thread,and I didn't read it dense as hell.If you don't understand something keep quiet so your ignorance won't show. Originally Posted by ekim008

You’d do well to follow your own advice, but again, you are incapable of understanding – you lack the necessary cognitive skills.

Just enjoying your posts; keep up the good work Monstermouth.

You still haven't commented on the muslim judge berating the victim about all things Islam, but NOT doing the same to the (alleged) perp !

Let us know how you stand on that please.

You’d do well to follow your own advice, but again, you are incapable of understanding – you lack the necessary cognitive skills. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

How does it feel being the poster child for stupidity? If you were able to make a good point it would be a wonder.Just the same drivel over and over.

How does it feel being the poster child for stupidity? Originally Posted by ekim008

What? Is this the title of your forth coming biography? How very appropriate.

If you were able to make a good point it would be a wonder.Just the same drivel over and over. Originally Posted by ekim008

Look in the mirror twit, look in the mirror.

poor IB