Some Body Needs To Explain To "Harvard Law Professor" President Obama How The Law Works.

We do not have the right to overthrow the Government. I think that fits the definition of Sedition. If you try to actually attempt to overthrow the Government, you will probably end up in a prison, or a grave. Originally Posted by Jackie S

The hell we don't! When government starts oppressing the people, we not only have the right to change it, or overthrow it, we have the DUTY to do so.

I think we need a very serious non-violent revolution. Our government no longer represents us. They represent themselves and seek only to obtain and retain power. They do this by bowing to the whims of the international banks and corporations. None of them give a damn about freedom.

One man's sedition, is another man's fight for freedom. Our founders were terrorists, until they won.

The hell we don't! When government starts oppressing the people, we not only have the right to change it, or overthrow it, we have the DUTY to do so.

I think we need a very serious non-violent revolution. Our government no longer represents us. They represent themselves and seek only to obtain and retain power. They do this by bowing to the whims of the international banks and corporations. None of them give a damn about freedom.

One man's sedition, is another man's fight for freedom. Our founders were terrorists, until they won. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I agree with the concept of a non violent revolution that leads to a change at the ballot box. As long as the incumbents respect the election process violence is not an option. It is up to the people to speak up if the elected leaders are voting against their interests.

It doesn't matter who votes in an election anymore, it's who counts the votes. Don't expect change to come from the ballot box. It won't happen.

Won't happen. Not even Obama is that nuts. It would guarantee him losing the election along with most of the democrats in congress that did not actively oppose what he did. I agree that he would do it if he thought he could get away with it but, with the public being opposed to it, he knows he would lose plus any effort to enforce the order would end up in court. The same courts that he ignored and would be opposing it the whole way to retain their power. Originally Posted by Laz

I hope I'm wrong, but I have a gut feeling he will do it. Him and his czars, EPA, are single handedly trying to put the oil and gas industry into non existance. Make us pay 10 bucks a gallon for gas, telling us what to eat....WTF..... he is not nuts, he is cold and calculating, has the media nazis's behind him, and behind the scenes Soros... if this communist sob does win again, we are in for a world of hurt..!!!!

It doesn't matter who votes in an election anymore, it's who counts the votes. Don't expect change to come from the ballot box. It won't happen. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I believe it was FDR's buddy Joe Stalin that said it's who counts the votes that matters. That's how Al Franken stole his senate seat; he rigged the recount. Of course if Acorn (or whatever they call themselves now) can get enough Donald Ducks and Mickey Mouses registered, that will help too.

fuck the votes let the SC decide.

which ever party appointed the most judges wins.

Worked for #43.

Worked for #43. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Actually Gore vs Bush was a 7-2 vote. That means two or three evil commie libs ruled in accord with the Constitution, for a change.

I hope lighting will strike twice and we get a 7-2 vote overturning BaboonaCare.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

very classy joe.

Hey COG, I suppose you could say you have the right to do anything, right up untill the time the cell door closes.

In 1861, The South thought they had the right to break away from The United States of America and form their own Country. Many said that yes, they had that right.

What cancelled out that right was the over powering military might of the United States, and a President who was not afraid to use it.

Yes, you have the right to voice your displeasure with the way elected officials carry out their duties. Yes you have the right to protest laws that you do not agree with. Yes, you have the right to petition the government, and yes, you have the right to vote for candidates that more reflect your beliefs.

But no, you do not have the right to change the basic tenants of our Constitutional Republic.

The South thought they were right. It took over 600,000 dead Americans to prove the error of their ways.

Hey COG, I suppose you could say you have the right to do anything, right up untill the time the cell door closes.

In 1861, The South thought they had the right to break away from The United States of America and form their own Country. Many said that yes, they had that right.

What cancelled out that right was the over powering military might of the United States, and a President who was not afraid to use it.

Yes, you have the right to voice your displeasure with the way elected officials carry out their duties. Yes you have the right to protest laws that you do not agree with. Yes, you have the right to petition the government, and yes, you have the right to vote for candidates that more reflect your beliefs.

But no, you do not have the right to change the basic tenants of our Constitutional Republic.

The South thought they were right. It took over 600,000 dead Americans to prove the error of their ways. Originally Posted by Jackie S

So, the fact that a president illegally attacked states that did, in fact, have the right to leave (TX specifically reserved the right to leave the union in the treaty it joined the union with) means what? That you're in favor of another president illegally using military force against Americans? Is THAT your point?

If they try to do what the South did in 1861, yes.

There is an old saying that before the War, the common name for this Country was "These United States". After the war, it became "The United States".

Incidentally, that thing about Texas is null and void. Yes, when Texas first joined the Union, it did reserve the right to break away. But, when it joined the Confederacy, and fought against the United States, and lost, it re-entered the United States as a defeated foe.

That made the originol treaty null and void.

Hey COG, I suppose you could say you have the right to do anything, right up untill the time the cell door closes.

In 1861, The South thought they had the right to break away from The United States of America and form their own Country. Many said that yes, they had that right.

What cancelled out that right was the over powering military might of the United States, and a President who was not afraid to use it.

Yes, you have the right to voice your displeasure with the way elected officials carry out their duties. Yes you have the right to protest laws that you do not agree with. Yes, you have the right to petition the government, and yes, you have the right to vote for candidates that more reflect your beliefs.

But no, you do not have the right to change the basic tenants of our Constitutional Republic.

The South thought they were right. It took over 600,000 dead Americans to prove the error of their ways. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Let's hope it doesn't take that many lives to restore our constitutional republic again. We are not the America of 1861. We are a burgeoning socialist police state. I am opposed to that. There are very few candidates that reflect my beliefs, because they have been bought by the Business-Bank-Government alliance. If you think America is still a free country, you are sadly delusional.

very classy joe. Originally Posted by CJ7

What can I say, it's how I roll!

Let's hope it doesn't take that many lives to restore our constitutional republic again. We are not the America of 1861. We are a burgeoning socialist police state. I am opposed to that. There are very few candidates that reflect my beliefs, because they have been bought by the Business-Bank-Government alliance. If you think America is still a free country, you are sadly delusional. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

What is that saying.. (hmmm..) A puppet is free so long as it loves it's strings?

George Carlin once said that we only have the illusion of freedom in this country.. they make you think your free because you have too many choices.. let's see do I want to smoke the menthol lights or the camel cigs? Do I want to drink the latte coffee or the mocha mocha? Because we have so many choices like these kind we only think we are free.. I guess that was his point.