Doubt, identity crisis, what's real, trust!

Sanan, I am definitely the "dense" one on this subject and the way I come across is rude, arrogant, and self-centered. Quite honestly it's pathetic and rather entertaining to watch you rant and I do truly believe you love the attention. I am not denying your freedom of speech but maybe if you didn't come across like a dick, you wouldn't piss so many people off.
Us ladies as providers have to right to screen whom( who??? ) ever how ever we want. Point blank. If you don't like it take your business elsewhere. It's that simple. I don't care how long you've been on here and I don't care how many reviews you have screening is a must. I will do whatever it takes to assure that myself and my clients are safe. Obviously safety isn't a major concern of yours and that is absolutely sad, because you can put yourself in great danger. If a provider doesn't screen you that should send you a major red flag. If a client neglects the screening process that is a major red flag for us. Trust is not something just given out to any person, especially not in the hobby, it is something you must earn. So for you to expect for any provider to trust some random person(no matter how long you've been a member, and no matter how many reviews you have) is insane. Originally Posted by ~SummerBaylee~

You write all this to say that you screen how ever you like? This topic isn't about how you, as an individual screen. And nobody, least of all me, is saying that you should not screen. This is about how you might screen, and who must be more, or less , thoroughly screened.

Then you misquote, and misunderstand; so, I do not say anything at all about safety or compromising that. I.e there is not one word about STDs or any of that in this topic, although elsewhere we discuss LE and it's focus on street crime as opposed to BCD where prosecutions lead to complaints from third party providers of service to the hobby, and so, that is far less common in San Antonio.

MPK, I think he's just referring to VIP's (Very Important Person) as the well-known/high dollar/desired women based upon the Dr. Seuss image write-ups he's provided. It seems to just refer to the ladies in general, and not really a select bunch, but who knows? More importantly, who cares!?

Of course VIP could mean Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide which is a neurotransmitter in the brain, but I doubt that's the case.

Either way, in light of my irrational rantings/attitude ( see my other postings for more irrational rantings), I'm convinced I am just another guy trolling the boards. Don't feed me people! LOL

Self portrait of Bunkus Marcus78
Originally Posted by Marcus78

Keep taking the pills doc, you read like you sure need them ...as well as a session with a shrink.

sanan, I don't know if there is a rule against it or not but when you quote someone you should not edit what they stated without making it clear that you made changes. You have modified the original statements in at least a couple of the quotes above. I did not check them all.

By now it should be clear to you that the overwhelming majority of the people here disagree with you. If the providers agreed with you I would have to reconsider my opinion but they don't. They have to live with the consequences of a bad decision so I think I will accept what they want.

Have fun on BP or the new forum you alluded to.

If I see any more insults or rudeness here I will start handing out points like candy.

A nasty piece of work, and your expositions on this site illustrate that well.

But back for more abuse!

Ok here goes

You talk so much crap that readers could be forgiven for thinking your face is a horse's rear.
Originally Posted by sanan

LOL I talk crap? Compared to most on this site, I'm pretty quiet. Look in a mirror young lady/boy or whatever you may be. Please go back to BP where you might belong...

Let me know if you would like to discuss this in person so I can enlighten you on he dangers of meeting people you don't know...

If I see any more insults or rudeness here I will start handing out points like candy. Originally Posted by Mokoa

Thanks Mokoa :0)

It began with good intent and good ideas, then folks got lost in the details with irrelevancy.

We have raised all the right questions and hopefully providers AND hobbyists ( those who comprehend the issues OC ) will have a better perception of screening.

So this topic needs closing.

Thanks to ATXdream for starting the debate :0)