Obama's family would NEVER burn the New York Times! What a writer! Originally Posted by Little StevieA couple of commas probably would have made the sentence more clear. You are obviously trying to misunderstand. Speaking of writing, did you ever get Hustler to publish one of your letters? Maybe, you're aiming too high. Then again, I guess everyone has to have a dream.
There are lots of stories about Obama that are much more incriminating than this bogus Romney story. You won't be reading about them in the Washington Post. They'll be on World Net Daily and the left will dismiss them as not credible because they're not on main stream media. That's the game they play. Originally Posted by joe bloeIf thinking that pisses you off, then please, continue doing so.
You're missing the point (deliberately no doubt). This is MAIN STREAM MEDIA digging up dirt on a Republican. They don't do that on Democrats. A journalist moved in next door to Sarah Palin. She had to build a privacy fence to keep him from looking into her windows. They went through her trash cans. They interviewed everyone she ever knew, well almost. They read thousands of her emails, probably illegally. Main stream media has left Barack Obama completely alone. Only blogs and relatively obscure sources that have little money or name recognition go after Obama.Hey there, postard, where are you and the rest of the TPunkers getting all of the fodder for your "revelations" of these so-called "incriminating" acts? Your sources are YOUR "lamestream" media. Don't you think if Faux-up Noise could dig up something REAL that they wouldn't have already - and had it spread all over the world? You and your ilk daily strain the bounds of credibility with your mental contortions in the name of your orthodoxy. Stay in your little dream world where things are all nice and sensible - to the IQs below 60.
There are lots of stories about Obama that are much more incriminating than this bogus Romney story. You won't be reading about them in the Washington Post. They'll be on World Net Daily and the left will dismiss them as not credible because they're not on main stream media. That's the game they play. Originally Posted by joe bloe
I'm not voting for Romney unless Kansas becomes a battleground state, and maybe not even then. I don't like either one. But this high school shit is ridiculous. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyAnd calling a law student a slut who disagrees with you isn't?
I haven't done any of those things. And I'm not a TPunk. You are delusional, RaggedyAndy. The more you try to help Obama, the more votes Romney will receive.ho, ho, ho - and a bottle of hair tonic. There's not one vote to be changed in here and you're calling me delusional?
I wish I liked one of them, it would make this election more interesting. Both of them have supporters who are actually determined to see them lose. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
And calling a law student a slut who disagrees with you isn't?You are a jackass, Randy4Andy. Each one of your examples can be offset by multiple, equally reprehensible remarks from the left, and you know it.
Calling the President's mother a whore isn't?
Birther noise, Muslim noise, unsubstantiated "revelations" aren't?
75% of your threads aren't? (being generous here)
There's more - you know there is. That's why you TPunks are so touchy when you get called out. Must be something about being sensitive to light. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy
Tudor brick buildings? I think that should be mock Tudor brick buildings.And nobody 'mocked' the Tudors!
The Old Court at my college had proper Tudor brick buildings. Originally Posted by essence
that didn't keep you from stating that "this high school shit is ridiculous." Gawd, you're tiresome - and purposefully dense. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy