The whole "under 130 lbs" thing is crap...it's funny how many males are completely oblivious to the fact that a healthy, attractive weight for MOST active women of average height (65") or thereabouts usually BEGINS at 130 lbs, lol.
You know the sickly, little 5' whatsit" guy weighing in at $20 (sorry, little guys, no offense intended), lookin' like one badass breeze would knock him out??? That's what you start gettin' if want to whittle your women down to the same proportions, lol...media's got the whole thing screwy...body fat and clothing size is a MUCH better indicator of overall HWP, in my opinion...
For what it's worth, from a personal standpoint, well,...lemme put it in boxing terms for ya: I weigh in as a junior middleweight/superwelterweight. I tried being upfront about my weight once, but the Misconception is Sttttrrrrong amongst the SA community (witness all the recent dumbass threads...you know which ones). Body fat is 10%, I wear a 4/6, and stand juuust shy of 65", BUUT I have to synopsize all of the above into language the majority of the population can get on the first go-round...what does this mean? Well, as a female, most non-athlete's guesstimate is 130-135 lbs, lol...so I go with that (even though, I admit, in my head I hear Jim Carrey from
Liar, Liar: "in your BRAAA"! )
So, while not awesome that I allow them to make me "conform"...I'm willing to poke my head out to lend my support...for what it's worth 130 lbs is faaar from fat for an average healthy, active female.
M.
PS. CarmelCleva, if that's you in your avatar...luscious is the first word that comes to mind! Props to you for being honest about your weight...kinda made me feel bad, lol...so here ya go