Obama: Socialist Party Membership Confirmed

joe bloe's Avatar
f the article, f the 1996 he joined bs ... and unless any of you can point out the significance any of this has on the economy, jobs and the people touched by both, then f you too.

all of you pathetic morons have cried wolf wolf for so long about shit that has no relevence nobody except your own shit slinging ilk gives a damn, ergo politically neutering yourselves.

kudos. Originally Posted by CJ7
We're in the worst recession since the thirties. We've got a socialist for president, and you're asking what significance this has on the economy. America is a capitalist system, having a socialist in charge, is obviously a problem. Anyone with an IQ bigger than their hat size can see that.

PS
Why is it you guys on the left can't seem to make an argument without resorting to profanity? Do you think it makes your argument more convincing? It doesn't. It just makes you seem uneducated and mean spirited, but I guess that's why you're liberals in the first place.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-07-2012, 09:49 PM
We're in the worst recession since the thirties. We've got a socialist for president, and you're asking what significance this has on the economy. America is a capitalist system, having a socialist in charge, is obviously a problem. Anyone with an IQ bigger than their hat size can see that.

PS
Why is it you guys on the left can't seem to make an argument without resorting to profanity? Do you think it makes your argument more convincing? It doesn't. It just makes you seem uneducated and mean spirited, but I guess that's why you're liberals in the first place. Originally Posted by joe bloe

we're not in a recession ... you have a small hat size huh Joe. Obviously the definition of socialists and capitalists escapes you just ike it does COF.

Im not a liberal. I didnt vote for Obama. I wont vote for Obama.

why is it you guys on the right seem to qualify anyone that doesnt march lockstep with your stupidity as a liberal. It doesnt make your argument anymore convincing. In fact it makes you look totally uneducated.

have a nice evening

we're not in a recession ... you have a small hat size huh Joe. Obviously the definition of socialists and capitalists escapes you just ike it does COF.

Im not a liberal. I didnt vote for Obama. I wont vote for Obama.

why is it you guys on the right seem to qualify anyone that doesnt march lockstep with your stupidity as a liberal. It doesnt make your argument anymore convincing. In fact it makes you look totally uneducated.

have a nice evening

Originally Posted by CJ7
You are full of it and we know you>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkYl_...eature=related
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
we're not in a recession ... you have a small hat size huh Joe. Obviously the definition of socialists and capitalists escapes you just ike it does COF.

Im not a liberal. I didnt vote for Obama. I wont vote for Obama.

why is it you guys on the right seem to qualify anyone that doesnt march lockstep with your stupidity as a liberal. It doesnt make your argument anymore convincing. In fact it makes you look totally uneducated.

have a nice evening

Originally Posted by CJ7

CBJ7, Stop it! You're killing me!

We're not in a recession?!

LOL! This explains why you don't understand economics.

I have to review some of FastGoon's and Doofie's posts, but this one may be the winner for stupidest ever. Wow! LOL!

joe bloe's Avatar
we're not in a recession ... you have a small hat size huh Joe. Obviously the definition of socialists and capitalists escapes you just ike it does COF.

Im not a liberal. I didnt vote for Obama. I wont vote for Obama.

why is it you guys on the right seem to qualify anyone that doesnt march lockstep with your stupidity as a liberal. It doesnt make your argument anymore convincing. In fact it makes you look totally uneducated.

have a nice evening

Originally Posted by CJ7
You're definitely a liberal. No conservative would post the nonsense you do, probably not even a moderate. Why are you ashamed of your liberalism? Why not flaunt it like the rest of your comrads?

I noticed you didn't use any profanity. Good for you!
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
CBJ7 is probably a member of the Socialist Party himself, and doesn't want Obama associated with it so the party's integrity isn't compromised. They do have standards, you know.
joe bloe's Avatar
CJ7's behavior is certainly puzzling. He never writes anything but liberal crap and then denies being a liberal. He's like some guy that wears makeup, a dress and sings show tunes and then gets mad when people assume he's gay.
I haven't read anything about that prior to this thread, but it surely isn't a surprise. The truth is, Obama is a cruel hoax played on the American people. There is only one interest Obama has in mind and it surely isn't us. It's "Wall Street" Obama works for Wall Street. He's an agent of Finance Capital.
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Interesting that you would bring up the boy who cried wolf. If you remember the story he was right at the end. There was a wolf and the towns people were sorry they didn't believe him.

You started your post by saying F this and F that which tells me that you accept what they say (you admit the truth) but you don't care and try to shift attention by changing the subject from is he to what does it matter.

You're busted you know. You've admitted that you believe the stories but you just don't care.

As for joining; I wonder how many Nazis never joined the party but still did their dirty work? Consider that only about 8 million Germans joined the Nazi Party. How did they ever fight a war with only 8 million soldiers?
Romney should start slammming Obama fir membership in the socialist New Party. It fits with Romney's claim that Obama wants to turn us into a European style socialist state.
Guest123018-4's Avatar
He is a Marxist, socialist and it does not work. Is that significant enough for you.
joe bloe's Avatar
Romney should start slammming Obama fir membership in the socialist New Party. It fits with Romney's claim that Obama wants to turn us into a European style socialist state. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
When Democrats get caught red handed, as in the case of Obama joining The New Party, their tactic is to deny reality. In yesterday's congressional hearings Eric Holder was confronted with an email that referenced "fast and furious". His response was to pretend that the email didn't say fast and furious, he pretended that it actually said "wider receiver" (an operation left over from Bush). He literally denied reality.

Obama's defense to his New Party membership will be that being a member of a socialist organization doesn't mean he's a socialist. It's similar to Clinton saying that he never had sex with Monica Lewinsky because oral sex isn't sex.
I agree; and hope that Romney puts Obama in the position of saying "it depends on what your definition of is is".........

We know Brian Williams, Wolf Blitzer, and the MSM won't.

When Democrats get caught red handed, as in the case of Obama joining The New Party, their tactic is to deny reality. In yesterday's congressional hearings Eric Holder was confronted with an email that referenced "fast and furious". His response was to pretend that the email didn't say fast and furious, he pretended that it actually said "wider receiver" (an operation left over from Bush). He literally denied reality.

Obama's defense to his New Party membership will be that being a member of a socialist organization doesn't mean he's a socialist. It's similar to Clinton saying that he never had sex with Monica Lewinsky because oral sex isn't sex. Originally Posted by joe bloe
When Democrats get caught red handed, as in the case of Obama joining The New Party, their tactic is to deny reality. Originally Posted by joe bloe
they deny reality in everything, in life, in human nature, in objective truth, in right and wrong, in economics, you name it...for what reason? power, self interest, money without working for it, greed and envy, selfishness.

just take the radical environmentalists...their philosphy is basically..we want all of you to die..so we can enjoy nature and have an idyllic garden of eden...and so it goes
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Be very careful CJ7, your pals claimed we were in a recession back in 1992 during the election and attacked Bush with it. Problem is that the recession had technically ended in October of that year. So you can't have it both ways. If you look at the economy we are in a recession in all but the very narrow technical defintion. (two consectutive quarters of negative GDP growth) However, there are divided opinions on what is a recession.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession