And Reagan. Originally Posted by DooveNot sure if Reagan was that secretive, his second term was akin to ''Weekend at Bernie's''!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCTgcZ6ImsQ
And Reagan. Originally Posted by DooveNot sure if Reagan was that secretive, his second term was akin to ''Weekend at Bernie's''!
Ah, yes. Disagree with Trynagetlaidbutcantgetitup, and you're a "hater". Bizarre Obamaton reasoning. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyAnother fool who slept through 3rd grade reading comprehension class. A question was answered with a tirade. Fuck you guys I'll just google it and research my question. I'm pretty sure the answer is yes.
Not sure if Reagan was that secretive, his second term was akin to ''Weekend at Bernie's''!My point is that COG can't get it through his thick skull that he has no clue how secretive prior presidencies were because they all occurred before he had the ability to search 4 million billion websites that all aimed to do nothing but point out any negative they can dig up about the President - no matter how small and insignificant. Like most of COG's threads.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCTgcZ6ImsQ Originally Posted by WTF
Another fool who slept through 3rd grade reading comprehension class. A question was answered with a tirade. Fuck you guys I'll just google it and research my question. I'm pretty sure the answer is yes. Originally Posted by trynagetlaidit VERY simple, it is called "Leave of Absence with a stipend"
Dream on. Romney is going to beat Obama like a rented mule, or should I say donkey. Speaking of scary and worthless, Obama had better be careful demanding full disclosure of Romney's past. If Obama's past was ever fully disclosed, the swing vote would evaporate. Of course, exposing Obama's communist/socialist past, would energize his base. The African-American vote would probably go to 120%, instead of the usual 110%, not to mention the effect it would have on the dead and convicted felon voters. Originally Posted by joe bloeDisagree . Romney is not a sure bet.