Say what you will, Romney got a 1 point bounce, if that's what you want to call it. Originally Posted by Yssup RiderWhile Obama seems to have received a welcome "bounce," Romney's more closely resembled a well deserved thud!
When you have to go running to what i said in another thread to defend yourself over what i said here, in this context, you lose. Originally Posted by Doove
So, I can't hold you responsible for what you said in another thread and try to use it against you? Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
Hey Jdriller!Apparently you guys don't understand what the term "in this context" means.
Haven't heard from you since you were telling us you paid 35% of your total income in federal taxes.
Whatchya been up to?
You lose. Originally Posted by Ducbutter
Apparently you guys don't understand what the term "in this context" means.Seems pretty clear that you brought up something the guy had said in a previous thread in an effort to undermine his credibility in a new thread or context.
NG: "Stop calling me dumb."
Doove: "I didn't call you dumb."
NG: "But, well, you did call me dumb 3 weeks ago."
Doove: "Maybe i did, maybe i didn't, but i didn't call you dumb here."
NG: "But you did call me dumb 3 weeks ago, so don't pretend that that isn't the same as calling me dumb here."
Doove: "UGH!" Originally Posted by Doove
Yeah. Like Doove's time is so valuable.It's my understanding, Doofus is a government employee. If that's the case, the odds are, his job is overpaid, makework, redundant, civil service, unionized, can't be fired and affirmative action; in a word, parasitic.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
http://www.dickmorris.com/obama-thug...aign=dmreportsLOL, "thugs!" Wonder what those gun-totin' fat, white guys wre in the 2010 TPunk "revolution?" Fugitives from the PTA meeting?
Obama thugs influencing, or trying to, influencing polling results. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
It's my understanding, Doofus is a government employee. If that's the case, the odds are, his job is overpaid, makework, redundant, civil service, unionized, can't be fired and affirmative action; in a word, parasitic.Well, that explains a lot.
Most government employees don't really work ever, in terms of actually doing something of value. More often than not, the so called work of most government employees is detrimental to the public good. The American public would be better served if most government employees just got paid to stay home.
Seems pretty clear that you brought up something the guy had said in a previous thread in an effort to undermine his credibility in a new thread or context. Originally Posted by DucbutterI did no such thing. NG hasn't even claimed i did any such thing. But if you need to believe that out of your desperation to make me the bad guy, knock yourself out.
It's my understanding, Doofus is a government employee. Originally Posted by joe bloeFactually incorrect, so the point of the rest of your post was what?
Then quit making statements like "you and your kind" which you did on another thread. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53That comment was made after i made it clear i didn't do that in this thread.
Seems pretty clear that you brought up something the guy had said in a previous thread in an effort to undermine his credibility in a new thread or context. Originally Posted by DucbutterI never brought up anything he said in a previous thread. Frankly, the only way i knew you were talking to me with that comment was that you quoted me, and you don't like me. The meaning behind the comment itself could only be applied to him.
That question is not germane to this topic. You're deflecting.The best part is, even if i did what you and he want to say i did, so what? He only accused me of painting him with the same brush as i paint other posters. And that morphed into you accusing me of using a quote of his in another thread to undercut his credibility.
Face it. You're a loser by your own defenition. Originally Posted by Ducbutter
That comment was made after i made it clear i didn't do that in this thread.
I never brought up anything he said in a previous thread. Frankly, the only way i knew you were talking to me with that comment was that you quoted me, and you don't like me. The meaning behind the comment itself could only be applied to him.
The best part is, even if i did what you and he want to say i did, so what? He only accused me of painting him with the same brush as i paint other posters. And that morphed into you accusing me of using a quote of his in another thread to undercut his credibility.
You two need to get together and get your stories straight. That, or you just need to learn to pay better attention. Originally Posted by Doove