Romneys staff admits they manipulated his tax returns

Learned from the master, Wichita Whineman! I gave you a chance to debate like a man, but you chose to be a playground squeezedick. This is something you brought on yourself.

BTW -- KANSAS IS SO FUCKED UP IT CAUSED PEOPLE ON ACID IN THE 30S TO INVENT OZ!

That twister is coming pretty goddammed fast, Whineman! Better hunker down!

Seems like that's the only kinda repartee that gets through to you intelligentsia! OK, I know, you were a professor of animal husbandry at the Wichita School of Sheep Shagging... sorry! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

speaking of Oz

Do you live under a rock Yssup? Romney had a 59 point plan for saving the economy which became a 5 point plan that he talked about during the convention and has continued to talk about since then. You need to get off the Kool Aid and MSM.


I think Randy is looking for a way to reattach his ass. Good job.

Do you live under a rock Yssup? Romney had a 59 point plan for saving the economy which became a 5 point plan that he talked about during the convention and has continued to talk about since then. You need to get off the Kool Aid and MSM.


I think Randy is looking for a way to reattach his ass. Good job. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

do you live under a rock? during the convention has nothing to do with right now .. apparently youre the kool aid soaked moron without a clue ... go figger eh?

since the convention he named Ryan for his VP .. since he named Paulie both he and Paulie are on record saying they dont know because "we havent crunched the numbers yet? ... we'll get back with you ... yada yada yada


elect me and I'll tell you later ... LOL

yeah fuck that economy saving plan Willard .. just go and help JD yank his head out of his ass and attach it to yours, lips first.

I just want my golden plates, special underwear and a tax haven in the Caymen Islands.

And all he has to do to get his "overpayment" back is file an amended return the day after the election. He'll, he may have already filed it for all we know.

WTF once again you look at things in twisted manner.
When you have 47 percent of the people paying zero INCOME TAXES what is fair about a person paying 2 million dollars in federal income taxes? Since you are so good at percentages, why dont you tell me what percentage of income taxes he paid over what the 47 percent that paid nothing is and lets see what that number looks like.

Personally, I paid way too much in income taxes but if EVERYONE paid something it would be much fairer than it is now.

OK, I'll play...just to humor the mentally challenged who think they have just scored a big one. JD, my ass is fine and dandy. Didn't feel a thing other than your tongue flicking around my sphincter. There needs to be some "there" THERE when you droolers attempt logic.

Let's substitute $50,031.00 for $40,500.00. BFD. $50K vs $11.5M - laughable - I think Thurston and Lovey still enjoy a comfortable margin, by, oh, let's say, a factor of 230. In our family of four, statistics show that both parents work and average $25,000.00 yearly income each. You can parse it at $30K and $20K or $40K and $10K if you like, but the $50K total is $50K. In any case, jobs at that income level are just reeking of security and come with outstanding benefits (that was sarcasm, mouth-breathers). Plus, one has to add in childcare, essential to two worker families, which will run more than $2.6K per year for two kiddos. Please, spare us the, "another family member can watch the children" non-argument. I wonder if employers would like to suddenly have 50% of the available workforce, especially at the $25K or less cost, become unavailable? Holy shit! Labor costs per employee might go up - unspeakable! Hmmm, I wonder what a Big Mac would cost then?

Hell, figure it at $150K, if you like. It doesn't matter. I still am having a slight problem in generating sympathy for Thurston's and Lovey's "tax burden." The fact is that T2Nutlickers' alleged "point" isn't one.

Also, Thurston's and Lovey's $11.5M is the Adjusted Gross Income, not the Gross Income. If we're going to get rid of the deductions for our family of four, let's get rid of them for everyone. Then, Mitt's and Ann's taxable income shoots waaaaaay up, as does their rate. Oops! JDB, you're just freaking amazing...LOL...as a source of humor.

And all he has to do to get his "overpayment" back is file an amended return the day after the election. He'll, he may have already filed it for all we know. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

You sound really, really jealous, TTH. Is that jealously a product of your innate greed?

OK, I'll play...just to humor the mentally challenged who think they have just scored a big one. JD, my ass is fine and dandy. Didn't feel a thing other than your tongue flicking around my sphincter. There needs to be some "there" THERE when you droolers attempt logic.

Let's substitute $50,031.00 for $40,500.00. BFD. $50K vs $11.5M - laughable - I think Thurston and Lovey still enjoy a comfortable margin, by, oh, let's say, a factor of 230. In our family of four, statistics show that both parents work and average $25,000.00 yearly income each. You can parse it at $30K and $20K or $40K and $10K if you like, but the $50K total is $50K. In any case, jobs at that income level are just reeking of security and come with outstanding benefits (that was sarcasm, mouth-breathers). Plus, one has to add in childcare, essential to two worker families, which will run more than $2.6K per year for two kiddos. Please, spare us the, "another family member can watch the children" non-argument. I wonder if employers would like to suddenly have 50% of the available workforce, especially at the $25K or less cost, become unavailable? Holy shit! Labor costs per employee might go up - unspeakable! Hmmm, I wonder what a Big Mac would cost then?

Hell, figure it at $150K, if you like. It doesn't matter. I still am having a slight problem in generating sympathy for Thurston's and Lovey's "tax burden." The fact is that T2Nutlickers' alleged "point" isn't one.

Also, Thurston's and Lovey's $11.5M is the Adjusted Gross Income, not the Gross Income. If we're going to get rid of the deductions for our family of four, let's get rid of them for everyone. Then, Mitt's and Ann's taxable income shoots waaaaaay up, as does their rate. Oops! JDB, you're just freaking amazing...LOL...as a source of humor. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Please cite where you read Romney was considering disallowing a tax deduction for, let's say, home mortgages for the middle class and the poor but not for the rich. You may have a problem generating sympathy for Romney, but it's evident you have no problem generating jealousy.

Please cite where you read Romney was considering disallowing a tax deduction for, let's say, home mortgages for the middle class and the poor but not for the rich. You may have a problem generating sympathy for Romney, but it's evident you have no problem generating jealousy. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

ask Willard to "please cite" exactly what deductions he plans to modify ...

he wont say, ryan wont say, and you want a quote ??

elect me and I'll tell you later ... LOL Originally Posted by CJ7

It worked for Odumbo, you Kool Aid swilling hypocrite.

It worked for Odumbo, you Kool Aid swilling hypocrite. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

you defending a guy that does the same thing that Odumbo does speaks volumes about you ..

poor IB

you defending a guy that does the same thing that Odumbo does speaks volumes about you ..

poor IB Originally Posted by CJ7

That you're defending Odumbo -- who has demonstrated he is incompetent -- says volumes about you, CBJ7. Change is necessary and required. Romney is the only viable alternative who stands a chance of defeating Odumbo. As long as the choice is between Romney or Odumbo . . . .

yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn


The End.

yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn


The End. Originally Posted by CJ7

A "no comment" from CBJ7 on Odumbo's demonstrated incompetent and ineffectual presidency.