Unemployment drops to 7.8%...want to buy a bridge?

LovingKayla's Avatar
Obama so loved the poor, he created millions more.
Randy4Candy's Avatar
He was born in Kenya. Voter fraud. People only voted for him because he was black. Polls are being conducted wrong. It's all a conspiracy at the BLS. Blah, blah, blah. . . .

Its' never that the dogs just don't like the dog food, is it? It just never occurs to you morons that people hate what your party stands for. Obama is a weak centrist Democrat who has pissed off most of his own party, pass a Republican health care bill that puts billions in the pocket of the very industry that creates most of our health care financing problems, and passed a very weak and too small stimulus bill has has kept the economy crippled and you STILL can't beat him. What a bunch of fuck ups and whiners. Originally Posted by TexTushHog
All that TTH posted before my blue highlighting is true, too - BUT - the highlighted part is easier for the TParrotriots to comprehend.
TexTushHog's Avatar
we dont like lawyers either Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
So you're going to vote for one HLS alum over another? Really bright. At least you should vote for the one that made Law Review.
Randy4Candy's Avatar
So you're going to vote for one HLS alum over another? Really bright. At least you should vote for the one that made Law Review. Originally Posted by TexTushHog
For nevergiveitathoughtbecauseheca n't - HLS = Harvard LAW SCHOOL
LovingKayla's Avatar
ROTFL!!!! And it's never just that folks can't stand what YOUR party stands for. This is a hoot.

Let the chips fall where they may.
Originally Posted by markroxny
Hahaha, yeah dream on. That charts upside down stupid.
markroxny's Avatar
Hahaha, yeah dream on. That charts upside down stupid. Originally Posted by acp5762
No it isn't dumbass.
...and passed a very weak and too small stimulus bill... Originally Posted by TexTushHog
So you still think the stimulus bill was too small?

Good Lord! Are you fucking kidding? It was about $860 billion, by far the largest "stimulus package" in U.S. history, and it was not the appropriate medicine for the economy. Please take a reasoned look at economic history. The entire doctrine undergirding arguments in favor of massive pseudo-Keynesian stimulus packages has been thoroughly discredited. We've discussed all this before; you should have paid attention.

The problem is that none of the fundamental structural problems affecting our economy have been addressed. Anyone who thinks the problem is a failure to spend enough money is living in some sort of alternate universe.

The Obama economic agenda is simply an extention and expansion of the George W. Bush big-spending, tax cutting, non-regulating agenda. (Please don't try to tell us that you think Dodd-Frank does much about TBTF or any other financial sector excesses.)
LexusLover's Avatar
At least you should vote for the one that made Law Review. Originally Posted by TexTushHog
Might want to fact check that .... "made Law Review" ...

I think we have a hint of how he excelled in "moot court competition"!
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 10-05-2012, 05:39 PM
Obama's tenure at the Review has been chronicled at length in the Politico, the New York Times, and elsewhere.
joe bloe's Avatar
It's not a significant drop anyway. it's like having gas prices dropping three cents per gallon, then rising five cents per gallon a few months later. One step foreward two steps back. There hasn't been any positive long term impact from this administration and there won't be. Obama is like a handy man that is a big bafoon. he'll take something apart in an attempt to fix it and parts are left over. Originally Posted by acp5762

The drop is only significant because 7 something sounds better than 8 something. It's psychological. There's a reason merchants sell a product for $499.99 instead of $500.00.
wellendowed1911's Avatar
Obama so loved the poor, he created millions more. Originally Posted by LovingKayla
Kayla did you watch the debate - and do you know there re 2 more debates plus one VP debate? Remember you were the one in early September that made a post about about:"what's taking these guys so long to have a debate(your words paraphrased). Give it up Kayla you are the Sarah Palin of Sandbox.
So you're going to vote for one HLS alum over another? Really bright. At least you should vote for the one that made Law Review. Originally Posted by TexTushHog
I meant you, you dolt
No it isn't dumbass. Originally Posted by markroxny
Yeah it is ya crybaby stand on your head so you can read it. That should'nt be hard you have a flat head.
No it isn't dumbass. Originally Posted by markroxny
Here's what I don't get, well I do get it, so it will visually mislead, but didya notice the 6 months under bush was about the same width as About a year and a half under Obama? Nah, you didn't

A more useful chart would be to pull out the government sector and juxtapose the result with the growth in job seekers

Or how about just raw numbers of people actually with a job when Obama became president and how many people today are working