Father of Slain SEAL: Who Made the Decision Not to Save My Son?

Put them on ignore? They are among the funniest here! They will defend ANYTHING Obama does. It's sad, but it's funny as hell at the same time. Like watching an idiot running into a wall time and time again. It's hysterical how stupid they are!

And Stevie, as soon as that Seal's mother asked Romney to stop, he did. He respected her. Something you wouldn't understand.

Hey Stevie, I checked out your links, check out this one and get back to me, Ok?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=AR37NL89rfI

In an interview with judge Pirro he directly implored Obama to quit lying, tell the truth and in so doing turn his life around......


Instead of living a life where power is the goal and expediency the way, it would be strange for Obama to "turn his life around"... But ultimately so freeing

Stevie?

In an interview with judge Pirro he directly implored Obama to quit lying, tell the truth and in so doing turn his life around......


Instead of living a life where power is the goal and expediency the way, it would be strange for Obama to "turn his life around"... But ultimately so freeing Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

For Obama to stop lying, would be like the Devil accepting Christ as his lord and savior. It's just not going to happen.

Hey Stevie, I checked out your link
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Did it turn you on

watching real time means its too late to scarmble a military response ...

now back to asap Originally Posted by CJ7

So, you think Ambassador Rice was telling the truth?

A (he has many right now) "problem" Obaminable has is there ARE members of his "team" who will not lie, even for him. That does happen at times, particularly when the "team" members sense that the "ship is sinking" and only the "captain" must remain on board as it goes down, so they are going to grab a seat on the nearest lifeboat and hang on for the ride to survive.

#1: Who has to ask the Libyan "government" for permission to intervene in an attack on U.S. property and people, which and who the Libyan government was tasked to protect and failed to do so, when it was the U.S. military that was primarily responsible for facilitating the existence of that same U.S. military?

#2: Using that delicate, politically correct, and inhumane term ... there were "assets" on the ground in Libya that were available on short notice (remember 2 of them went on their own .... ON FOOT ... and died in their effort BY MORTAR FIRE while asking for additional assistance ... from the "assets" they just left to go help ... PLUS ... there were ADDITIONAL "assets" .... "IN COUNTRY" ... that had GUNSHIP capability ..... which was WHY those that died were "painting" the enemy ....

#3: Help from Italy was only an hour away ... the fire-fight went on for at least 4 hours before our people were dead or close to death!

"
"AFRICOM leader General Carter Ham was never given the order to secure the consulate in Benghazi. This is what the general told Rep. Jason Chaffetz after the 9-11 Benghazi terror attack.

"That means only Barack Obama or Defense Secretary Panetta, the two men above the AFRICOM commander, never ordered an operation to secure the consulate. This was despite the many pleas for assistance coming from the consulate and annex.

"The US had troops in Sigonella, Italy – about an hour away on 9-11."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012...enghazi-video/

General Ham was replaced on October 18th! Why?

Because he was ordered by "the Boss" to send in help and didn't? or
Because he spoke the truth?

Many servicemembers and officers have integrity. Ham does.

Maybe this father can join Cindy Sheehan

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/28/sheehan/index.html

We all know the concern shown for her from the right.

+1 WTF

It is all pure fiction now and they all eat it up. Supposedly the WH was in the situation room just watching as the attack unfolded and there were units right there waiting, but with no orders (like they wouldn't have engaged anyway) they didn't support the consulate (NOT embassy). Yeah, right.

Also, the "SEAL" was actually and ex-SEAL and highly paid private contractor, which doesn't make losing his life any less tragic, but he wasn't in uniform and so was an security guard and ex-soldier not a "soldier".

They think this is some CSI NY real time , no fog of war , black and white choice.

But I would like LL to tell me what he thought of Cindy Sheehan. As I recall it was not to flattering. I in fact thought she was a bit out there but what greiving parent isn't? But shit happens, especially when your child accepts a job in Lybia that is very well paid and dangerious.

So where are all the Democrats ? Every body should be pissed about this, NOT just Republicans.
You would have to be a village idiot to not see that the whole situation is screwed up, from the beginning to now.
It shouldnt matter if you are conservative or liberal the bottom line is alot of what went down is wrong. Americans died and for no good reason...
No protection for the Embassy , now WTF or any other lib can jump on here and say they didnt need protection cause it wasnt dangerous ?? Lets here it boys !
They knew from the 1st second it started it was an attack not a protest ! Are you gonna argue that ?
All of the talking heads told US it was a protest gone wrong , every fucking day for 2 weeks ! They lied when the truth would have been better ! Gonna argue that ?
Forget the fn politics, this flat wrong, if you cant admit it , if you cant see the forest from the trees then you really do have issues....

So where are all the Democrats ? Originally Posted by steamyromance

Same place all the Republicians were when Cindy Sheehan was out talking about her sons death.

It is all political BS except for the grieving parents.

If Sheehan's son was killed while calling for assistance, where the assistance was available but not sent and no effort was made to save him, I would have joined her outrage. The issue here is not that they died but that there was no assistance sent and then the administration lied to make themselves look better.

Same place all the Republicians were when Cindy Sheehan was out talking about her sons death.

It is all political BS except for the grieving parents. Originally Posted by WTF

There were at least 2 brave republicans that claimed foul on Bush's war, right ?

This is different though , the Ambassador wasnt a soldier , what im saying is i dont give a shit if its right or left if someone fucks up this bad they need their ass kicked..

Thats what i was asking from you , if the WH screwed up dont you think they need their ass kicked ?
I guess i am bugged about all the defense of an indefensible position...

So, you think Ambassador Rice was telling the truth?

A (he has many right now) "problem" Obaminable has is there ARE members of his "team" who will not lie, even for him. That does happen at times, particularly when the "team" members sense that the "ship is sinking" and only the "captain" must remain on board as it goes down, so they are going to grab a seat on the nearest lifeboat and hang on for the ride to survive.

#1: Who has to ask the Libyan "government" for permission to intervene in an attack on U.S. property and people, which and who the Libyan government was tasked to protect and failed to do so, when it was the U.S. military that was primarily responsible for facilitating the existence of that same U.S. military?

#2: Using that delicate, politically correct, and inhumane term ... there were "assets" on the ground in Libya that were available on short notice (remember 2 of them went on their own .... ON FOOT ... and died in their effort BY MORTAR FIRE while asking for additional assistance ... from the "assets" they just left to go help ... PLUS ... there were ADDITIONAL "assets" .... "IN COUNTRY" ... that had GUNSHIP capability ..... which was WHY those that died were "painting" the enemy ....

#3: Help from Italy was only an hour away ... the fire-fight went on for at least 4 hours before our people were dead or close to death!

"
"AFRICOM leader General Carter Ham was never given the order to secure the consulate in Benghazi. This is what the general told Rep. Jason Chaffetz after the 9-11 Benghazi terror attack.

"That means only Barack Obama or Defense Secretary Panetta, the two men above the AFRICOM commander, never ordered an operation to secure the consulate. This was despite the many pleas for assistance coming from the consulate and annex.

"The US had troops in Sigonella, Italy – about an hour away on 9-11."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012...enghazi-video/

General Ham was replaced on October 18th! Why?

Because he was ordered by "the Boss" to send in help and didn't? or
Because he spoke the truth?

Many servicemembers and officers have integrity. Ham does. Originally Posted by LexusLover

bla bla bla ...

49 minutes after the attack started there was an email saying the fighting had stopped ... 2 hours later there was another email saying the fighting started again..

SEND IN THE TROOPS!! ... NO WAIT, CALL THEM BACK!! NO WAIT SEND THEM BACK!!

makes no difference either way, Like I said, regardless what decision was made the mouth foaming rightwingers would be doing exacty what they are doing right now ... foaming at the mouth ... you screamed like a pig stuck in a gate when we entered Libya with the UN "Obama is starting another war" ... now you bitch because we didnt go into Libya !!
this scenario started with mouth breathers yammering "the ambassador being RAPED!! and continues to live because we didnt send another 20-50-100?? soldiers to gather in a compound and take intermittent mortar fire from various positions and be killed too?

youre a fuckin idiot LL.

end of story