WTF is trying to rewrite history again! We (the GOP/conservatives) have always wanted all the ballots counted according to the rules. ?
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
They were for the most part. What I said was that because of the confusing butterfly ballots, votes meant for Gore were given to Pat Buchanan. That is just tough luck on Gore's part but that does not change the fact of WTF I said. I said had the ballots not been confusing, Gore would have gotten an extra 2k votes that went to Pat and would have been President. But it was confusing and Bush won and I have no problem with that. Voters should have paid better attention. Read Buchanan's book if you do not believe me.
http://www.cagreens.org/alameda/city/0803myth/myth.html
Pat Buchanan himself has admitted that most of his votes in Palm Beach County were meant for Al Gore, saying he "did not campaign and bought no advertising there" (Nichols, 2001, p. 86).
He added, "I would say 95 to 98 percent of [the votes] were for Gore" (
id. at p. 89). The day after the election, many people were upset, saying the butterfly ballot was confusing. When the election results were "too close to call," Buchanan worried he would be charged with costing Gore the election. He said he got more media coverage after the election than he did during the campaign (
id. at p. 84). The graph to the left showing an abnormally high Buchanan vote in Palm Beach County suggests the butterfly ballot cost Al Gore thousands of votes, more than enough to have won the presidency.