Do mommy marks bother u as a hobbyist??

You guys talk like it is a given that every mother has stretch marks. That is just not the case.

Of course guys don't care. It's just mentioned in the physical description part of the review as a general observation.

Of course guys don't care. It's just mentioned in the physical description part of the review as a general observation. Originally Posted by Fort Worth Punk

Take heed of that little snippet of sarcasm. Asking a man if he minds your stretch marks will get you as many realistic responses as asking:
"do you think I look fat in this dress?"
"do you think I am good in bed?"
"do you like my haircut?"

No, but it knocks $100 off the price real quick. Originally Posted by BarebackLover

Oooooooooh that's low

But good point.

If they don't have em, they are too inexperienced for me. Originally Posted by aRandyOne

Touche

How are we defining mommy marks? Stretch marks from natural birth? Scar from a C-section?

Even test-tube babies gotta grow somewhere, taint-tard, regardless of where they started. Beat-off babies have mothers, too.

Yeah, in an aquarium ... I saw the movie with Rock Hudson as a scientist.

How are we defining mommy marks? Stretch marks from natural birth? Scar from a C-section? Originally Posted by S-Man

*

Well, I'll be the jerk and say it ... If I'm booking with a PYT (pretty young thing) who claims to be a gorgeous young spinner and I see the pics immediately above because she hid it in all of her photos...yep, im going to be annoyed. Is it bait and switch? Not exactly...but the neither is using ten year old pics from when you were 300 lbs lighter. It's still you, but you're deliberately attempting to deceive someone and hope they are too polite (as most of us are) to call you on it.

Do you get upset when people lie to you? False advertising is illegal for a reason-no one likes to be screwed over. If your pics are misleading rather than mildly flattering, it's a problem. What's the difference? If you're asking, you're probably already over the line.

Mommy marks are fine...IF you haven't advertised by hiding them. Suprises are seldom a good thing in the hobby world.

Mommy marks are fine...IF you haven't advertised by hiding them. Originally Posted by the_chewtoy

This.

Yes to mommies!
No to mommy marks!

Well, I'll be the jerk and say it ... If I'm booking with a PYT (pretty young thing) who claims to be a gorgeous young spinner and I see the pics immediately above because she hid it in all of her photos...yep, im going to be annoyed. Is it bait and switch? Not exactly...but the neither is using ten year old pics from when you were 300 lbs lighter. It's still you, but you're deliberately attempting to deceive someone and hope they are too polite (as most of us are) to call you on it.

Do you get upset when people lie to you? False advertising is illegal for a reason-no one likes to be screwed over. If your pics are misleading rather than mildly flattering, it's a problem. What's the difference? If you're asking, you're probably already over the line.

Mommy marks are fine...IF you haven't advertised by hiding them. Suprises are seldom a good thing in the hobby world. Originally Posted by the_chewtoy

You are not a jerk just because you have a preference. Some girls need to take it easy and know every guy has their own tastes, and you shouldn't be afraid to voices your opinion with fear of being berated by mothers. That would be like me taking offense to guys who like only white chicks, it's just a preference - no big deal. I think some guys have kept mum about this subject because they don't want backlash.

If more guys voiced their opinion on the subject there would be less of a backlash.