The Bengazi conspiracy crap starts to unravel

It is an ignorant and fallacious claim to say that Odumbo, et al, had nothing to do with the "talking points" when Odumbo, et al, CHOSE to use those "talking points" rather than the true story about the Benghazi attack! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Wrong again IBCryin

(CBS News) WASHINGTON - CBS News has learned that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) cut specific references to "al Qaeda" and "terrorism" from the unclassified talking points given to Ambassador Susan Rice on the Benghazi consulate attack - with the agreement of the CIA and FBI. The White House or State Department did not make those changes.
There has been considerable discussion about who made the changes to the talking points that Rice stuck to in her television appearances on Sept. 16 (video), five days after the attack that killed American Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, and three other U.S. nationals.
Republicans have accused her of making misleading statements by referring to the assault as a "spontaneous" demonstration by extremists. Some have suggested she used the terminology she did for political reasons.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_1...bi-signed-off/

GAME OVER!

Wrong again IBCryin


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_1...bi-signed-off/

GAME OVER! Originally Posted by markroxny

I B Crying is taking yet another page out of Whirly's "Trending" wrong playbook!

It appears that I B Crying is trying desperately to steal Whirly's "Trending" thunder!

Who will win? Will it be the "Trending" newcomer, I B Crying or the grizzled ol' veteran Whirly?

It's a race to the finish!

Stay tuned!

I expect IBSyndrome to continue howling at the moon, in spite of the facts that all evidence points to his being wrong.

Wrong again IBCryin


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_1...bi-signed-off/

GAME OVER! Originally Posted by markroxny

Once again you let your ignorance shine through, marks-rocks-with-pee. Odumbo, et al (Carney, etc), used those same "talking points". Odumbo, et al, CHOSE to use those same talking points. Odumbo, et al, CHOSE to pertpetuate a story he and the others knew wasn't true.

You can't get around that simple fact, marks-rocks-with-pee, unless you believe Odumbo never knew the truth in the first place. Unless you are saying Odumbo is an ignoramus that couldn't be trusted with the real intel on Benghazi, marks-rocks-with-pee? Are you saying Odumbo is such an ignoramus that the only"talking points" he knew about was the fallacious, dumbed-down version that was given to Rice? Is that what you are saying, marks-rocks-with-pee?

I expect IBSyndrome to continue howling at the moon, in spite of the facts that all evidence points to his being wrong. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Of course.

Assup’s spastic sphincter is dribbling-blather, spouting shit and foaming spatter! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It’s crappy time for BigKoTex. BigKoTex is the second biggest repository of shit in this forum! Assup is the biggest!!! Keep sucking that shit up, BigKoTex!!! Assup has dribbled a bunch, but, BigKoTex, you’re dribbling too; so mop up after yourself while you’re at. Originally Posted by bigtex

.

Assup is a dropping and BigKoTex is a sopping!!! Sop up Assup’s butt-butter, BigKoTex!!!

Starts to unravel?? It was never woven to begin with. It's never been anything to a bunch of silly thought in the minds of a bunch of right wing cranks to begin with.