Oh please... don't get me started in the Sandbox.
Got 2 hours? .....
Politics=insanity
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...5277695921912#
And the world would be a lot better off if subordinates stood up to the fuck up/liar in chief. Originally Posted by ThrillBill88
This whole thing is pure bullshit. The idea that Rolling Stone magazine could affect the course of the war and the future of our country is insanely WRONG!! Originally Posted by CrystalkittySitting aside the politics of the situation for a moment, let me share my (a former US Army officer) perspective of this situation. The first "rule of thumb" taught in Officer Candidate School (OCS) is very simple and basic. Your Commanding Officer might not always be correct but he (she) is always the Commanding Officer. General McChrystal's comments to Rolling Stone were extremely unprofessional and quite frankly immature. The General would not have tolerated such behavior from his subordinates. Why should he expect anything different from the Commander-in-Chief?
What's SHMBs? Originally Posted by BudmanSilly Hooker Message Boards. I don't want to get into a political debate but it seemed pretty apparent on aspd that more Republicans than Democrats were willing to post in the political threads. I doubt if that's changed here. Of course there's nothing wrong with anyone deciding to discuss (or not discuss) their politics but the threads always seem pretty pointless. We're on a silly hooker message board taking time out of our days to complain about the idiocy of very powerful and successful people. No wonder they're where they are and we're where we are.
Silly Hooker Message Boards. I don't want to get into a political debate but it seemed pretty apparent on aspd that more Republicans than Democrats were willing to post in the political threads. I doubt if that's changed here. Of course there's nothing wrong with anyone deciding to discuss (or not discuss) their politics but the threads always seem pretty pointless. We're on a silly hooker message board taking time out of our days to complain about the idiocy of very powerful and successful people. No wonder they're where they are and we're where we are. Originally Posted by BoothAnd how do you know we are not part of the pwerful and successful people? Regardless of where you think most of us fall in this food chain Obama is a fucking ass that is going to ruin this country.
No wonder they're where they are and we're where we are. Originally Posted by BoothNo kidding!
And how do you know we are not part of the pwerful and successful people? Regardless of where you think most of us fall in this food chain Obama is a fucking ass that is going to ruin this country. Originally Posted by BudmanIt's certainly your right to be wrong.
As to your comment that more R's than D's posted to the political threads on ASPD and ECCIE I would have to disagree. It seems pretty balanced from the right and the left. Originally Posted by BudmanYou clearly didn't keep up with the political forums on aspd, particularly in Houston. To say they leaned to the right would be an extreme understatement. ECCIE appears to be much better.
You clearly didn't keep up with the political forums on aspd, particularly in Houston. To say they leaned to the right would be an extreme understatement. ECCIE appears to be much better. Originally Posted by Booth
This thread says far more about the politics of those who frequent SHMBs than it does about President Obama. The self-alerts are always appreciated though. Originally Posted by BoothYou call it self-posted-alert, and we call it SCREENING. Not all $ is good, and life is too short to waste a moment.
I'd love to get a Libertarian as President along with a Senate and Congress that would support him. Could probably bring the country back to its original course. Originally Posted by SternomancerActually a better course as we have a much better understanding of what liberty and a free society are, what they require, and how to prevent corruption, than our founding fathers.