For someone that's not being subjected to my veteran veting questions, you sure as hell are afraid to include them when you quote me... Hmmmmmm... I wonder.....
MT Sock Puppet: What a fucking Idiot!
Says the dumbass that posts as if he only has one brain cell and it's busy trying to take him over, causing him to type as if he's possessed by a retarded ghost.
But, the emotion in your reply, against "someone else" on this thread, shows that you took my series of replies very personal, as if I got under your skin directly addressing you.
MT Sock Puppet: Luke is BANNED. If you were so smart you would know what that meant. You are such a bad ass arguing with someone that is not here.
What I stated, in my replies to him:
"Know that I'll respond to you, and that when I do, I'll include these questions in one of my responses to you per salvo. I hope the others keep quoting these questions in their replies to you as well." -- herfacechair
What I've said in my replies to you:
"...since you're too retarded to figure this out, and to see the relationship between our replies and counter replies, let me break this down to you.
"Let "X" be your replies to me.
"Let "Y" be my rebuttals to you.
"Now, are you ready for this? What's happening, between us, is this:
"If 'X', then 'Y'.
"You control 'X', I control 'Y'. You advance 'X', I respond with 'Y'. Like I said before, I'm going to keep hammering you, 'ad infinitum'. The only way that 'Y' will stop is if 'X' isn't advanced." -- herfacechair
What part of the bolded red statement in my quote, and the X/Y relationship explanation above, do you NOT understand?
Where, in any of those statements, does it say that someone's banning, or passing for that matter, would prevent my replies? If you were smart, or if you were capable of reading comprehension, you'd understand that I will reply ad infinitum until the opposition quits living up to a definition of insanity... The part about doing the same thing and expecting different results.
In previous arguments, I've stated this, paraphrased:
"Even if I don't reply later today, tomorrow, the next day, the next week, the next month, the next year, decade, century, lifetime, I WILL reply..." -- herfacechair
His being banned isn't my problem, it's HIS problem. He should've thought about that BEFORE he replied to me last time. Had he done that, I wouldn't need to reply to him now, wouldn't I? Just like you liberals to want to excuse people from their responsibilities, and their contribution to their own demise.
Again, I treat these debates like a combat operation. I will fire against the opposition until the opposition is neutralized. So yes, I know what a banning means, it means that the retard that got banned wouldn't be able to reply, as I indicated here:
"It must burn you to not be able to reply, we know that you're still reading these posts." -- herfacechair
Given that I made this statement, quoted in your post above, how could I "NOT" know that he was banned?
The cold hard reality is that the following has become evident with my participation here:
1. I've constantly rebutted those that I'm arguing against...
2. I've flat out stated that I will reply...
3. I've constantly mentioned the above X/Y relationship indicating the fact that I will keep replying.
If you were smart, YOU'D know what that meant. It'd mean that I'll reply regardless of whether the opposition wisely quits, gets banned, or passes away. The onus is on the opposition to consider that reality before arguing a debate that they've lost the moment that I've jumped in.
Either you're stupid, or you're driven by emotion based narcissism that you expect to do things without suffering the consequences... As if you're entitled to a specific outcome regardless of the fact that others here have a vote in whether your pipe dream becomes reality or not.
MT Sock Puppet: Next post you will tell everyone how you ran him off.
What I said, quoted in your post:
"I'm not surprised, with you managing to get your arse handed to you by the moderators, by the providers, by other hobbyists, and by me, you were bound to get even more unhinged. It's like I mentioned before, you're too thin skinned to accept warranted corrective action or advice. You fight back when you should just "roger up" and move forward. You turn attempts, to help you, into massive battles that causes you to get on peoples' bad sides." -- herfacechair
And this, also quoted in your post:
"You carried your attitude, and reactions, wherever you found employment, and received the same results. You lost one job after another, and couldn't hold onto your career, just as you couldn't hold onto your good standing with ECCIE... getting banned a second time! I won't be surprised if ECCIE isn't the only message board where you've gotten banned." -- herfacechair
These two paragraphs list what I see as the cause of him getting banned. Go ahead, read it, this time without the emotion that you'd normally feel had you been Luke_Wyatt himself. Do you see it?
If you bothered pulling your head out of your ass, and removing your horse-blinders, you'd see that I was pointing my finger to Luke_Wyatt as the cause of him "getting ran off" this board.
I've given enough information in my posts, which you quoted, that should've prevented you from farting your uneducated opinion (your recent reply to me) out... Again... your replies; however, hint at the fact that you took my replies personally, as if I was addressing you instead of Luke_Wyatt.
The fact that you'd leave my questions out speaks volumes, especially since you're not the one subjected to them. You seem to put a lot of energy in attempting to dodge those questions... Hmmmmm.
MT Sock Puppet: LOL Fucking Pussy!
Says the guy that refuses to include the quote, with the list of veteran vetting questions, in his quoting of my posts... Even though they're not intended for him. I don't recall seeing you when I combat deployed to Iraq. Who's the pussy now, Stupid? There's only one war veteran in this exchange between us, and it's NOT you. Do you want to know how retarded your comment sounds?
MT Sock Puppet: I think you have been deprived of oxygen during one of your "sessions" (REPEAT POINT)
No, it's me making sure that you continuously get proven wrong. Also, you shouldn't attempt to use that in an attempt to "slam" when you consistently get your face smothered in your own shit, ahem, the disaster that you call, "your argument".
MT Sock Puppet: LOL Creepy Fucker
That's how countless of other regressives, that I've debated with over the past 13 years, have felt about my refusal to let up on them. With you kissing up to R.M. friend zone style, I wouldn't be surprised if she thought the same way regarding you.
Originally Posted by herfacechair
What did you say Felicia? I think you are the voice-over for Charlie Browns teacher. Blah , Blah blah, ....Blah
By the way did I tell you that one time at band camp there was a 150 Conservatives on this forum and I kicked all their asses with just one word? Man I am such a Conservative ass kicker that a Hooker gave me a ride across the country to go see the largest ball of twine.
Then I got up on that forum again and spouted out some more shit that sounded like a retard trying to impersonate Stephen Hawking. Wait a minute, that was you that sounded like that. But I am sure I sound like a bad ass too! If you don't believe me just ask.