Little Things

I didn't read all 29 pages so pardon me if I am being redundant, but if a provider sees her last client at 4am and you book for 8am as opposed to her taking a break from 12pm to 7pm wouldn't the intelligent question be to ask her to book you on an extremely low volume day where she is in control dependent on her schedule. She may have had 3 appointments one day and they all flaked so she messages you at 10pm as her only one of the day. Personally, I have seen over a dozen providers and have a SO and I can assure you that if you exercise proper hygiene no one is the wiser. If she lies to you would and says thank you so much for coming through because she had a busted day of appointments your ego will still soar. What do I know I'm only in my early thirties and have been a sex addict for 25 years, you do the math. Originally Posted by GOJC

You missed the "bacterial stew" pages of this thread. Basically, the "oven" "needs to be" at rest in "self-cleaning" mode for a specific amount of time for some.

I'm bored, so what the hell...

In terms of the original post, my understanding is the who's-on-first part (yes, this is an Abbot and Costello reference) was an example. A shorter version of the original question is: What other reasonable requests set you off in such an unreasonable way? The question can still be perceived as offensive because it assumes the request is reasonable and the response is unreasonable. Anyway, here is my attempt at a non-offensive version of the question...

What really sets you off where your response seems surprising to your client?

Don't know if that will work, but the point is that the client seems to think it's not a big deal, but the provider does. Originally Posted by emptywallet

And maybe FG will read your post and learn.

Well, it's been a little quiet around here since you split. A little advance warning next time please? Originally Posted by inspector farquar

Awwww.....tell ya what. If you're missing me, feel free to email me, hon.

Oh, and look (below) ... I'm "Old-T Approved" now! Originally Posted by inspector farquar

Well, there are rabbit holes, and then there are rabbit holes. Stop drinking the koolaid in the the same bottle over and over, and look for the other bottle.....ya might discover something better. Maybe you too will see the other rabbit holes..... When ya think all is not as it seems, ya might discover, all is not as it seems.

Old T....great guy! Non-judgmental of most. Too bad there are not even more like him. Don't ya think?

You missed the "bacterial stew" pages of this thread. Basically, the "oven" "needs to be" at rest in "self-cleaning" mode for a specific amount of time for some. Originally Posted by emptywallet

Facts are facts and some of us like the time tested self cleaning effects of mother natures pussy cleaning a tad more than those WooHoo's Clorox cleaned!

Facts are facts and some of us like the time tested self cleaning effects of mother natures pussy cleaning a tad more than those WooHoo's Clorox cleaned!

Originally Posted by WTF

No crucifying (your title) intended on my part. I used quotes because I haven't taken the time to review your facts. I like to review things myself before accepting them as fact or not.

It's your preference and, in general, I'm a live-and-let-live guy when it comes to the preferences of others.

Lol! I'd forgotten how truly stupid FastGoon is! Then you add WPF and the misogyny and ignorance become EPIC!

I'd love to see Caroline or Yummy anytime. First, fifth or tenth.


Great thread!