Jackie our girl Condalisa

guess i'm wrong on what you meant by your user name. bumscrum was correct.

interesting that women like your user name.

have to ask, what does "her face chair" mean? it obviously means something to you. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

In providing the breakdown of my username, I was showing how he was actually the lemming, simply going by feelings and by what others say rather than doing actual research. Yes, the women love my username.

In fact, back in November, 2010, I visited the New Mustang Ranch, and partied with a provider in her late 20s, blonde hair and blue eyes. Hot California girl. When she brought me to the negotiating room, and asked me for what I'd like to do, she was visibly interested when I mentioned to her that I wanted my username to be one of the activities during the party.

She immediately offered me what would be considered a "killer discount" for partying at the Mustang Ranch, below average rate compared to the average hobby rate in my area. They cater to the "high rollers" in those cat houses, who'd laugh at the complaints that hobbyists have on the "prices and rates" thread here.

After I posted a review of the party on their website, one of the other providers replied that she'd pay me to do to her what I described in the review. I've been doing this hobby since the late 1980s, I've had providers tell me that most of their clients request things that's "more about the clients", and they cater to that. With me, it's reverse and they feel that they get a lot out of the session.

Also, there are two ways to get a good description of what my username means. The first is to jump into my reviews and read the ROS. I give a description of my username in action. Second is by going onto my blog and reviewing the facesitting session that I had with Head Mistress Porsche Lynn (former porn star actress) on my "herfacechair" blog, click the "2010" hyperlink. It describes the facesitting.

. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That's a frontal "facesit". I prefer the reverse facesit, or riding the south face. The animated picture in this link is close to what I prefer. The woman in the picture looks like she's using her legs to carry her weight, she should relax those muscles and settle down for a full weight facesit... The real facesit:

http://www.sexinfo101.com/southface.shtml

Never considered that particular activity, but if that woman asked to sit on my face, I must confess that I might give the idea a whirl.

(As long as she let me maneuver around a bit during the entirety of the encounter!) Originally Posted by Ex-CEO

I enjoy it, also, I've yet to have a woman sit on my face too hard to where I couldn't maneuver.

Q. - How do you know if your girlfriend is overweight?
A. - When she sits on your face and you can't hear the stereo!

Originally Posted by lustylad

I read about this in the 1980s, where the woman facesitting you is so overweight that you couldn't hear the stereo. I thought it was funny.

How does that work for reach-around crew ? Do they have to ponder that question too ? How do they handle that now that their hero LUBE is gone ? Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Well, if they start missing all of a sudden, it might be that they were crushed and rushed to the hospital.

Originally Posted by bamscram

Leave it to the liberals to resort to grammar police mode to make up for the fact that they've constantly gotten crushed in the actual debate. How soon they resort to it is one, of many, visible, observable, measures of the desperation they feel.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: His face chair

Insult fail. In BDSM, a name that starts with a lowercase letter represents a submissive's name. A dominant's name is capitalized. The way you present it here, the "face chair" belongs to the dominant, not to the submissive. I take a submissive, to the woman, role, hence, "herfacechair." My face is "her" chair. Got it "brain"?

But, we non-lemmings know that you follow feelings and emotions, and just follow the crowd like what the lemmings are claimed to do, right into the water.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: could not even understand the cartoon.

Anybody that could read English generated in a way that a fifth grader would understand it would know that I understood the cartoon. I've lost count of how many times I've referred to your side of the argument as "lemmings". I've been doing that since arguing against liberals 13 years ago.

You've done nothing but repeat liberal talking points. Did this when I hammered you under your older username, you're doing this now. The others that I have argued against have also done this. No sign of critical thought, independent thinking, independent analysis, or any of that. Simply repeat the talking points from your liberal taskmasters, as well as the liberal talking points from the other liberals on this message board and elsewhere.

You guys consistently argue an erroneous argument. You do so because your sources of information are erroneous, but you guys don't care. You simply "fall off the cliff" with your erroneous sources of information, whether that be your information sources or others in your side of the argument.

If you look at my reply, you would notice that I effectively use the cartoon against you. In fact, it says "Democratic Primaries", in short, in the sign. That cartoon is consistent, with who to direct the lemming labeled to, with the arguments I have advanced over 13 years.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: It is why he is begging for a dick to suck.

My allies have destroyed you, year in and year out, since the first time I destroyed you on this message board. It shows. Not only do you lack originality, but you are parroting insults rather than coming up with your own. Don't mistake that reflection in the mirror, that you're talking to here, as me. We all know that you are begging for a dick to suck, and are extremely excited to join the rest of ECCIE Dutch Rudder Gang at the H-E-B parking lot.

Perhaps when you do meet up with your Dutch rudder crew, you can find out if your "own vacation" hero is using his false military claims to get discounts given the proximity of the nearest military base to that HEB.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: You can always tell a lemming,

Says the guy that has a hard time seeing the fact that he is simply one of the liberal lemmings, of which there are many. My allies, on this message board, have knocked you on your ass so hard that you are left repeating yourself like a broken record. Perhaps if they keep this up, you are going to one day be found in the corner of your room, sitting in a fetal position, sucking your thumb to improve your dick sucking skills, constantly saying "lemming," with glazed eyes and drool flowing from your lips.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: you just can't tell them much..

You're proof that this is false. You've expressed so much of what isn't the case, proving the effectiveness of the propaganda campaign of the Democratic Party's propaganda machine, the mainstream media. My current MOS involves psychological operations/warfare. One of the things that we do is enemy counter propaganda. Your responses, as well as that of those that I have argued against here and elsewhere, are what we call positive impact indicators. These are measurements of the effectiveness of the enemy's propaganda efforts. In this case, the effectiveness of the mainstream media's propaganda efforts. You've spoken a mouthful, proving that lemmings can be told a lot.

It's obvious that herfacechair understands the cartoon better than I do.
This is why I, lemming bamscram, am begging for a dick to suck.
I could always tell a lemming simply by looking at my reflection in the mirror, and by looking at my commentary on these threads. I'm proof that the human brain can hold an indefinite amount of bullshit.

Let's make this clear, look at the sign being held up! That's me in that liberal lemming crowd!

Originally Posted by bamscram

Fixed to reflect reality.

I love watching you fall deeper into your meltdowns.

MT Fluffer: What did you say Felicia? (REPEAT POINT)

Apparently, I've whopped you so bad that I've stirred up memories of a previous severe arse whopping that you received in the hands of someone called "Felicia". But, I doubt that you meant this. I predict that you're going to see my reply, get even more unhinged, react to losing control, then move to try to regain that control by posting more of your meltdowns here. Which one of us is going to be right about what you'll do?

MT Fluffer: I think you are the voice-over for Charlie Browns teacher. Blah , Blah blah, ....Blah

No, that's just your narcissism working overtime setting up stress shields to protect your fragile ego from the knowledge that you are colossally wrong, that you do not know what you are talking about, and that you continue to be defeated in this exchange, as well as in other debates throughout this message board in the hands of my allies.

Knowing that you cannot mount an effective counterargument, you get extremely emotional and, driven by anger and control issues, you respond driven by emotions. I found, in my debate against liberals over the past 13 years, that you guys quickly resort to attempting to insult the victor when your arguments get crushed in a way that even you guys see that you guys don't know what you're talking about. You're too arrogant to do what anybody with integrity would do, bow out over an argument that you lost. Narcissism won't let you, and your seeing this will make you meltdown even further.

Consequently, you are left with nothing but narcissism driven emotion. The more you are shown that you are wrong, the more unhinged you become. The more unhinged you become, the more you generate replies that show me, and others, that you're melting down.

MT Fluffer: By the way did I tell you that one time at band camp there was a 150 Conservatives on this forum and I kicked all their asses with just one word?

BWAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA!

You may have thought that you "scored points" with this reply, but you didn't. You're so unhinged that you're getting your BS mixed up. Were you at band camp, or were you on this forum? Were you supposed to be practicing the flute, or were you on this message board? These are rhetorical questions designed to poke fun at your comment. Any critical thinker, reading your statement, would know that you're rapidly deteriorating to the "pull crap out of your ass and sling it continuously" maneuver to make up for the fact that even you know that your argument is indefensible, that you are wrong, and that you just simply need to sling poo around and hope that it sticks.

The only "band camp" that I can see you at is the one on the HEB parking lot, blowing the flute that's shoved through your mobile gloryhole.

Also, for someone that allegedly "defeated" 150 Conservatives, "with just one word", why don't you use that word here? Instead of using that so-called word, all you've done was continuously melt down. I wouldn't be surprised if you screamed at your computer every time you read the responses coming from my allies and me. The cold hard reality is that you did not defeat any conservatives. I see you getting your ass cut and shoved down your throat. How does your own ass taste?

MT Fluffer: Man I am such a Conservative ass kicker

No, you're a liberal ass whipped. I have destroyed your side of the argument, and you, on this thread. My allies consistently destroy you guys on the other threads as well. Not only do you guys get destroyed in the actual argument, you guys also get destroyed in the flame war. Look at your buddy Ekim. He has been destroyed to the point to where he's stammering "insults" that amount to him just parroting things.

But, the fact that you would even post that, in an attempt to be sarcastic, shows that despite all of your narcissism, the intellectual side of you is trying to tell you that you're getting your ass cut and shoved down your throat, that you are getting destroyed in this debate and so are your allies.

MT Fluffer: that a Hooker gave me a ride across the country

I've been rewarded for hammering retards like you, awesome ride. However, in your meltdown where you tried to "parody" my statement, you come close to saying something "true".

MT Fluffer: to go see the largest ball of twine.

This is your subconscious telling you that your continued meltdowns, and your inability to engage in debate, shows that you're hanging by a thread in this argument. Your subconscious is trying to tell you that, but you aren't listening as her narcissism is acting like horse blinders blocking you from reality.

MT Fluffer: Then I got up on that forum again and spouted out some more shit that sounded like a retard trying to impersonate Stephen Hawking. Wait a minute, that was you that sounded like that.

Here again, your subconscious is telling you that I have a valid argument, a very strong one, but your narcissism is trying to suppress that. By using words like "retard" trying to impersonate Stephen Hawking, your narcissism sets up stress shields to protect your fragile ego from all attacks of reason, coming from within... Your subconscious is telling you that I'm obviously more credible than you on this argument, and know what I'm talking about in these debates, and that you're getting colossally destroyed.

Your arrogance attempts to compensate for that growing reality, that you're not even close to being in my league in this argument, by dismissing an intelligent response/argument as "retarded". This is equivalent to a kid, telling another kid on the playground who just took the wind out of his argument, as his "being" dumb. You proved Ann Coulter right about you liberals... You guys quickly resort to doing the equivalent of calling people, who destroy you in argument, dumb.

All that mumbo jumbo that you spewed amounted to you having a meltdown over your having a hard time convincing yourself that "you didn't lose". But, that's reality, and your responses are starting to indicate that you're slowly starting to see it... You're getting your ass kicked royally.

MT Fluffer: But I am sure I sound like a bad ass too!

No, you sound and act alike an easily manipulated dumbass. Again, there's a purpose behind every word, sentence, paragraph, etc., that I use in my post. You reveal more about your psychological makeup when you reply to me, giving me more ammunition to use to say things to get you to go ape shit with your meltdowns. You're reacting exactly the way I intended for you to react with my replies, and your reaction is giving me lots of laughter... At your expense.

MT Fluffer: If you don't believe me just ask.

I don't need to ask anybody if you're full of shit. All I have to do is read your drivels where you prove that you don't have a clue about what you're talking about. But, I get a good laugh watching you melt down further with each reply, with more emotion driving your replies. Heck, you've told so many whoppers that you just displace Burger King and the last president in the amount of whoppers served.

After I posted a review of the party on their website, one of the other providers replied that she'd pay me to do to her what I described in the review.
Originally Posted by herfacechair

Wow you really are full of yourself. Escorts offering to pay you?
Give me break Dude.
That one comment confirms exactly what kind of an idiot we are dealing with here. Now you are a Male escort along with all your other talents. Ninja warrior, Double knot spy Mensa alumni, Extreme typist, and renown Psychologist. I bet you taught Chris Kyle everything he knows. And by that I don't mean his marksmanship, I mean his ability to lie on the spot. I don't want to out you, but I think I know who you are. Did your Mom pick vegetables when you were a kid? Did you run for President? Are Pyramids grain Silo's?

MT Fluffer: Wow you really are full of yourself.

I'm full of facts, in this argument, so in a sense of being full of facts, yes. In terms of your implication that there is no factual basis to what I state, then you're so full of yourself that you float. But again, based on my replies to you, as well as the replies of the others here against you, it's blatantly obvious that you're so full of BS, that if you were to take a dump before coming to ECCIE, you'd be speechless.

MT Fluffer: Escorts offering to pay you?

First, what I actually said, clearly indicated in the post that you quoted:

"one of the other providers replied that she'd pay me to do to her what I described in the review." - herfacechair

What part of "ONE" did you not understand? That, however, should not be surprising to you, given this other statement in my post that you left out:

"She immediately offered me what would be considered a 'killer discount' for partying at the Mustang Ranch, below average rate compared to the average hobby rate in my area. They cater to the 'high rollers' in those cat houses, who'd laugh at the complaints that hobbyists have on the "prices and rates" thread here." -- herfacechair

And this:

"I've been doing this hobby since the late 1980s, I've had providers tell me that most of their clients request things that's 'more about the clients', and they cater to that. With me, it's reverse and they feel that they get a lot out of the session." - herfacechair

One common complaint, that women have about men, is that men who are good at cunnilingus are few and far between, and are "keepers" when encountered. This is true in the vanilla world, this is true in the hobby world.

I know you have your MT cranial cavity shoved so far up Luke_Wyatt's ass that if he were to turn the corner, you'd snap your neck, but there HAS to be periods when that wasn't the case and even you would've came across that knowledge.

In the summer of 1990, I was paying less than $ for FS at the original Mustang Ranch, and even got a 2-hour session for that amount during my ATF's final days there. During this time, hobbyists partying at the Mustang Ranch were paying $$ + ½$ to $$$$$ for just an hour.

Why? What I quoted above. So yes, when that ONE provider stated that she would pay me to do the same thing to her, that is simply consistent with what I've seen and heard regarding female commentary on male willingness to do for them what males usually demand to receive.

MT Fluffer: Give me break Dude.

First, in order to use that expression, you would have to know, with the ability to prove, that the person you're talking to is "wrong". Not applicable in this case. The main reason you are saying this is that you are tired of getting hammered in debate. On top of you getting hammered in debate, I'm experiencing things you wish you experienced.

Second, I have been breaking your arguments on this thread. So, whenever you replied, it's a given that I'm going to continue to break your arguments. Looking at your commentary on the other threads, it appears that others here are breaking your arguments as well. You do not need to demand what we are willing to give you... Destruction of your argument and your credibility.

MT Fluffer: That one comment confirms exactly what kind of an idiot we are dealing with here.

The only idiot, in the exchange between us, is you. You making this comment is equivalent to you proclaiming yourself as "Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico," and then proceeding to make useless decrees.

You've been thoroughly discredited, and proven wrong, on this thread. Yet, you are driven by narcissism to keep returning to grinder to get destroyed in debate again. Your actions show us that you're the idiot.

MT Fluffer: Now you are a Male escort along with all your other talents.

What I actually said, quoted in the post that you included in your own post:

"one of the other providers replied that she'd pay me to do to her what I described in the review." -- herfacechair

WHERE, in that statement, do I make that claim?

Again, would it hurt you to read, what I post, with the intention of understanding what you are reading? Or, would reading English generated, so that a fifth grader would understand it, cause you to have vicious migraines if you attempted to understand it?

MT Fluffer: Ninja warrior,

Never made that claim. However, this is an insight into your subconscious. Your attempt, to be sarcastic, is nothing but your narcissism setting up stress yields to protect your fragile ego from the reality that the intellectual side of you is forcing you to see. When looking at our performance, in this argument, it would seem that I would be "like" a "ninja warrior" compared to you. Yes, I'm pulverizing you in this argument, like others here have pulverized you in other arguments. You're refusing to acknowledge that, but your intellect is giving you hints that you are getting destroyed badly.

If I were to sum up your debate philosophy, I would say that you go by the "bullshito code".

MT Fluffer: Double knot spy

Reviewing potentially false claims of military service, and military feats of accomplishment, for validity, does not make one a spy. However, your sarcasm in this area hints of how distressed you are of my ability, as well as the ability of others here, to easily see Luke_Wyatt's claims as false, in the military department.

Where, in any of my posts, do I claim to be a double knot spy?

MT Fluffer: Mensa alumni,

Again, in your sarcasm, you are communicating what your subconscious is telling you despite the efforts of your narcissism to admit. I'm presenting an argument, against you, that is forcing you to see that you have no standing in any of the arguments that you engaged on this thread. It's increasingly hard, for you, to stand by your arguments, which you have abandoned in this thread, the more I show you how wrong your line of reasoning is, and how wrong your conclusions are.

MT Fluffer: Extreme typist,

What I stated:

"Don't assume that I'm doing this on a phone, or tablet, and don't assume that I'm typing these posts. Even if I were to type this, I'm a speed typist, a skillset that I learned and used before coming across Dragon Naturally Speaking speech to text software." -- herfacechair

If you're describing "speed typist" as "extreme typist", this gives us a clue as to your own typing ability. This is an indication that I type faster than you when I do type. Either way, one point you should get, from this, is that it doesn't take me long to generate my replies to destroy your BS.

Your sub-consciousness consistently betrays you here.

MT Fluffer: and renown Psychologist.

What I actually said:

"What I put down, in my post, is based on what I know of the psychological profile of those that I am debating with. Both you and Private Luke_Wyatt, the phony retired SGM, are reacting exactly the way I intend you guys to react. You guys, like most other liberals that I have done this too, have reacted wonderfully in terms of doing exactly what I am causing you guys to do with my replies. It's like getting a puppy to chase after its own tail." -- herfacechair

You're stating that would be as idiotic as my claiming to be a "weatherman" simply by looking at the color of the horizon sky during sunset, or sunrise, and giving an estimate of what the weather would be like within the next 12 to 24 hours.

However, this is your subconscious betraying you by indicating that the psychological profile that I generated on you is accurate. Your reactions are what I would expect based on what I say. Even you are starting to see the validity of my claims that I have you people's psychological profiles down.

People "use psychology" in their everyday lives, that doesn't make them psychiatrists or psychologists.

You, being left with no argument, are slinging poo around like monkeys in the forest.

MT Fluffer: I bet you taught Chris Kyle everything he knows. And by that I don't mean his marksmanship,

Chris Kyle and I never met. What he learned, he learned growing up, and in the military. But, considering that I'm thoroughly slaughtering your argument on this thread, I could see why you'd think that I had interacted with him. I'm smoking your argument left and right, leaving you with no other option but to continue to disintegrate.

MT Fluffer: I mean his ability to lie on the spot.

In order to claim that someone is lying, anyone, you have to prove that they're lying. In this situation, you're insinuating that I'm the one that's lying, not you. This, in the same post, where you claimed that I made the above claims, never mind that my actual statements didn't support your assumptions. Absent your presenting a fact based, logical, reasoned, argument, you're doing nothing but pulling shit out of your ass and slinging it around, like what monkeys do.

That monkey has been banging its cymbals in your head too long, you're starting to take monkey like characteristics.

MT Fluffer: I don't want to out you,

Given your line of reasoning, and conduct, on this thread, you come across as the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail:



MT Fluffer: but I think I know who you are.

No you don't. The only thing, about me, that you know of is the fact that I consistently destroy you in debate, consistently rub your face in your own BS, and argue against you in a way that your subconscious is seeing that you're getting your arse handed to you.

MT Fluffer: Did your Mom pick vegetables when you were a kid?

No. However, you love to pick dingle berries from your fellow members of the ECCIE Dutch Rudder Gang while at the HEB parking lot.

MT Fluffer: Did you run for President?

No. However, you keep running your mouth in a way that causes you to have your foot up your mouth right after you get your ass shoved down your throat.

MT Fluffer: Are Pyramids grain Silo's?

No. However, I wouldn't be surprised if you wished that toy monkey, banging its cymbals in your head, would leave so that you could offer your MT cranial cavity as a colostomy bag. Gotta have a lot of material to post on ECCIE.

Wow I'm really full of myself. Claiming that my pee pee is something other than puny!

Give me break Dude.

That one comment confirms exactly what kind of an idiot you guys are dealing with when it comes to destroying me here. Now I, MT Pockets, am a Male escort offering free services at the HEB parking lot, improving my meat flute expertise. HFC and his allies are destroying my allies and me as if they were ninja warriors, double knot spies, MENSA alumni, and super typists. I, MT Pockets, am so shallow that HFC, and his allies, don't need to be psychiatrists to figure our psychological profiles out.

I, MT Pocket, taught Hillary everything she knows about being an expert liar. In fact, if my, MT Pockets, marksmanship where anything like the whoppers that I spew, don't stand behind me as I try to shoot the target in front of me, that's a good way for you to get shot.

My mom picked vegetables when I was young, I now pick dingle berries from the other members of the ECCIE Dutch Rudder Gang at the HEB parking lot. I organized a one member Collin County Defense force militia, and ran to become its commanding officer. I got kicked out instead. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Fixed!

Hey yellow bellied coward, how about making that comment on a thread I'm hammering your allies in, instead of spewing your BS on another thread proving to us that you don't know WTF you're talking about? Get back on this thread and take me on like a real man, instead of cowering like a child, pissing his pants, in another thread?

Clueless about WTF he's talking about: HFC is a gay

Anybody with at least half a brain would look at the reviews I've done, and my username, and conclude that I'm heterosexual. If you meant that my argument is "weak", well, then that's your narcissism setting up stress shields to protect your fragile ego from the reality that you're getting crushed in debate, and so are your allies.

Clueless about WTF he's talking about: welfare

Not on welfare you big dummy. But, you'd know that if you were capable of critical thought.

Clueless about WTF he's talking about: research assistant.

I don't assist anybody with doing their research. I do my own research, and will be soon utilizing the scientific method to complete the final chapters of my dissertation. But the fact that you'd mention "research assistant" shows that even your narcissism has a hard time blinding you to the fact that my responses to you guys is partly based on research.

Clueless about WTF he's talking about: Just another punk trying to throw around his service record on a whore board.

If you bothered to pull your head out of your ass, and remove your horseblinders, you'd realize that I didn't provide my service record on this message board. It's blatantly obvious that you didn't serve in the military, because if you did you'd know what a service record was.

And no, there's no "trying" regarding to present my military credentials here where relevant. I don't care how butt hurt you get about the veterans here putting forth their credentials here, I'm going to do it to remind the opposition of the fact that I have a vantage point over them.

Like in the case of Stolen Valor Luke Wyatt, the phony retired SGM, the phony war veteran. My military background is VERY relevant here, as well as in any argument where my military experience gives me a better vantage point compared to the dummies that I'm arguing against.

My presenting my military creds in an argument is no different than your presenting your builder creds in an argument against someone else where you felt that was relevant.

Your bitching about veterans presenting their military creds here amounts to you being a hypocrite.

Clueless about WTF he's talking about: He should have his military benifits stripped if in fact he was in the military. No way the Defense Department wants a service vet to use his military service to garner support on a whore board

You're willing to buy into a phony veteran's claim of being in the military, but are dismissive a REAL veteran's statement to the fact that he's in the military. There's no "was" about it. I've been in the military since the Soviet Union existed, with less than a year's break between my previous military branch and my current one.

Also, you have absolutely no clue about the Department of Defense's position on veterans, or actual service members, posting under an anonymous handle on a message board like this. The statements that you've made, regarding what you thought they want their service members to do, were FALSE.

Here, let me give you a clue about their position.

As long as we don't use our actual identity, in a way that makes it clear that we're in the military, while posting here, they don't give a fuck about us posting here! That's right you big dummy, as long as we don't give the impression, via our actual photo with us in military uniform, with our actual names, we're free to post here and talk up a storm about our military service provided that we don't divulge sensitive information!

For someone that's supposed to be older than me (in your 50s or 60s), you should know when to keep your mouth shut when it comes to topics that you don't know WTF you're talking about.

The fact that you'd demand that someone's military benefits be stripped, for daring to do something here that you disagree with, shows how unhinged you liberals are. Thank God that the American people, Congress, and finally a REAL commander in chief, disagree with your sentiment and have a philosophy, regarding earned military benefits, that'll ensure that I, and others like me, continue to enjoy our military benefits.

Also, shut that butthole of yours, that you have on your face, regarding the treatment that my allies are giving to Stolen Valor Luke Wyatt.

If you're concerned about the treatment that Stolen Valor Luke Wyatt is getting on these threads, realize two things.

First, Luke Wyatt had complete control of his actions. I informed him of what he should've done. He also had the option to NOT reply to any of us. Nobody pointed a gun to his head and forced him to read our posts, as well as our replies. He could've simply refused to reply to us and, better yet, completely abandoned the Politics Forum and RESET himself in one of the other forums before coming back here. If he was flamed again, then the option to not reply still stands.

Second, those arguing on his behalf also have complete control of their actions. Instead of bitching, whining, moaning, and groaning about my allies hammering Stolen Valor Luke Wyatt, how about you people shut your fucking mouths and resist the urge to reply? If you people were serious about "letting this rest", you guys would resist the urge to read posts slamming him, and resist the urge to reply.

If you people reply to us, regarding what we say about Stolen Valor Luke Wyatt, then YOU PEOPLE are as responsible as we are for keeping the flames against him ALIVE.

I'm sorry, if you're trying to tell people that you're a "libertarian", or something similar, and argue about self-governance and self-rights as opposed to state or federal control, you destroyed that concept by ignoring Luke Wyatt's glaring contribution to his treatment here, and by refusing to dwell on his responsibilities to include what he should've done. This extends to your actions, as well as that of your allies WKing for him. Both of these go hand in hand, your failure to consider these facts makes you a LIBERAL/REGRESSIVE.

I'm a gay retard that claims to not be a liberal.

I'm just another punk trying to throw around my builder creds on a whore board. The feds should come over and strip me of my illegal alien workers. No way should I exploit cheap labor to garner the manpower I need to build things. Originally Posted by WTF

Fixed!

MT Fluffer: Wow you really are full of yourself.

I'm full of facts, in this argument, so in a sense of being full of facts, yes. In terms of your implication that there is no factual basis to what I state, then you're so full of yourself that you float. But again, based on my replies to you, as well as the replies of the others here against you, it's blatantly obvious that you're so full of BS, that if you were to take a dump before coming to ECCIE, you'd be speechless.

MT Fluffer: Escorts offering to pay you?

First, what I actually said, clearly indicated in the post that you quoted:

"one of the other providers replied that she'd pay me to do to her what I described in the review." - herfacechair

What part of "ONE" did you not understand? That, however, should not be surprising to you, given this other statement in my post that you left out:

"She immediately offered me what would be considered a 'killer discount' for partying at the Mustang Ranch, below average rate compared to the average hobby rate in my area. They cater to the 'high rollers' in those cat houses, who'd laugh at the complaints that hobbyists have on the "prices and rates" thread here." -- herfacechair

And this:

"I've been doing this hobby since the late 1980s, I've had providers tell me that most of their clients request things that's 'more about the clients', and they cater to that. With me, it's reverse and they feel that they get a lot out of the session." - herfacechair

One common complaint, that women have about men, is that men who are good at cunnilingus are few and far between, and are "keepers" when encountered. This is true in the vanilla world, this is true in the hobby world.

I know you have your MT cranial cavity shoved so far up Luke_Wyatt's ass that if he were to turn the corner, you'd snap your neck, but there HAS to be periods when that wasn't the case and even you would've came across that knowledge.

In the summer of 1990, I was paying less than $ for FS at the original Mustang Ranch, and even got a 2-hour session for that amount during my ATF's final days there. During this time, hobbyists partying at the Mustang Ranch were paying $$ + ½$ to $$$$$ for just an hour.

Why? What I quoted above. So yes, when that ONE provider stated that she would pay me to do the same thing to her, that is simply consistent with what I've seen and heard regarding female commentary on male willingness to do for them what males usually demand to receive.

MT Fluffer: Give me break Dude.

First, in order to use that expression, you would have to know, with the ability to prove, that the person you're talking to is "wrong". Not applicable in this case. The main reason you are saying this is that you are tired of getting hammered in debate. On top of you getting hammered in debate, I'm experiencing things you wish you experienced.

Second, I have been breaking your arguments on this thread. So, whenever you replied, it's a given that I'm going to continue to break your arguments. Looking at your commentary on the other threads, it appears that others here are breaking your arguments as well. You do not need to demand what we are willing to give you... Destruction of your argument and your credibility.

MT Fluffer: That one comment confirms exactly what kind of an idiot we are dealing with here.

The only idiot, in the exchange between us, is you. You making this comment is equivalent to you proclaiming yourself as "Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico," and then proceeding to make useless decrees.

You've been thoroughly discredited, and proven wrong, on this thread. Yet, you are driven by narcissism to keep returning to grinder to get destroyed in debate again. Your actions show us that you're the idiot.

MT Fluffer: Now you are a Male escort along with all your other talents.

What I actually said, quoted in the post that you included in your own post:

"one of the other providers replied that she'd pay me to do to her what I described in the review." -- herfacechair

WHERE, in that statement, do I make that claim?

Again, would it hurt you to read, what I post, with the intention of understanding what you are reading? Or, would reading English generated, so that a fifth grader would understand it, cause you to have vicious migraines if you attempted to understand it?

MT Fluffer: Ninja warrior,

Never made that claim. However, this is an insight into your subconscious. Your attempt, to be sarcastic, is nothing but your narcissism setting up stress yields to protect your fragile ego from the reality that the intellectual side of you is forcing you to see. When looking at our performance, in this argument, it would seem that I would be "like" a "ninja warrior" compared to you. Yes, I'm pulverizing you in this argument, like others here have pulverized you in other arguments. You're refusing to acknowledge that, but your intellect is giving you hints that you are getting destroyed badly.

If I were to sum up your debate philosophy, I would say that you go by the "bullshito code".

MT Fluffer: Double knot spy

Reviewing potentially false claims of military service, and military feats of accomplishment, for validity, does not make one a spy. However, your sarcasm in this area hints of how distressed you are of my ability, as well as the ability of others here, to easily see Luke_Wyatt's claims as false, in the military department.

Where, in any of my posts, do I claim to be a double knot spy?

MT Fluffer: Mensa alumni,

Again, in your sarcasm, you are communicating what your subconscious is telling you despite the efforts of your narcissism to admit. I'm presenting an argument, against you, that is forcing you to see that you have no standing in any of the arguments that you engaged on this thread. It's increasingly hard, for you, to stand by your arguments, which you have abandoned in this thread, the more I show you how wrong your line of reasoning is, and how wrong your conclusions are.

MT Fluffer: Extreme typist,

What I stated:

"Don't assume that I'm doing this on a phone, or tablet, and don't assume that I'm typing these posts. Even if I were to type this, I'm a speed typist, a skillset that I learned and used before coming across Dragon Naturally Speaking speech to text software." -- herfacechair

If you're describing "speed typist" as "extreme typist", this gives us a clue as to your own typing ability. This is an indication that I type faster than you when I do type. Either way, one point you should get, from this, is that it doesn't take me long to generate my replies to destroy your BS.

Your sub-consciousness consistently betrays you here.

MT Fluffer: and renown Psychologist.

What I actually said:

"What I put down, in my post, is based on what I know of the psychological profile of those that I am debating with. Both you and Private Luke_Wyatt, the phony retired SGM, are reacting exactly the way I intend you guys to react. You guys, like most other liberals that I have done this too, have reacted wonderfully in terms of doing exactly what I am causing you guys to do with my replies. It's like getting a puppy to chase after its own tail." -- herfacechair

You're stating that would be as idiotic as my claiming to be a "weatherman" simply by looking at the color of the horizon sky during sunset, or sunrise, and giving an estimate of what the weather would be like within the next 12 to 24 hours.

However, this is your subconscious betraying you by indicating that the psychological profile that I generated on you is accurate. Your reactions are what I would expect based on what I say. Even you are starting to see the validity of my claims that I have you people's psychological profiles down.

People "use psychology" in their everyday lives, that doesn't make them psychiatrists or psychologists.

You, being left with no argument, are slinging poo around like monkeys in the forest.

MT Fluffer: I bet you taught Chris Kyle everything he knows. And by that I don't mean his marksmanship,

Chris Kyle and I never met. What he learned, he learned growing up, and in the military. But, considering that I'm thoroughly slaughtering your argument on this thread, I could see why you'd think that I had interacted with him. I'm smoking your argument left and right, leaving you with no other option but to continue to disintegrate.

MT Fluffer: I mean his ability to lie on the spot.

In order to claim that someone is lying, anyone, you have to prove that they're lying. In this situation, you're insinuating that I'm the one that's lying, not you. This, in the same post, where you claimed that I made the above claims, never mind that my actual statements didn't support your assumptions. Absent your presenting a fact based, logical, reasoned, argument, you're doing nothing but pulling shit out of your ass and slinging it around, like what monkeys do.

That monkey has been banging its cymbals in your head too long, you're starting to take monkey like characteristics.

MT Fluffer: I don't want to out you,

Given your line of reasoning, and conduct, on this thread, you come across as the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail:



MT Fluffer: but I think I know who you are.

No you don't. The only thing, about me, that you know of is the fact that I consistently destroy you in debate, consistently rub your face in your own BS, and argue against you in a way that your subconscious is seeing that you're getting your arse handed to you.

MT Fluffer: Did your Mom pick vegetables when you were a kid?

No. However, you love to pick dingle berries from your fellow members of the ECCIE Dutch Rudder Gang while at the HEB parking lot.

MT Fluffer: Did you run for President?

No. However, you keep running your mouth in a way that causes you to have your foot up your mouth right after you get your ass shoved down your throat.

MT Fluffer: Are Pyramids grain Silo's?

No. However, I wouldn't be surprised if you wished that toy monkey, banging its cymbals in your head, would leave so that you could offer your MT cranial cavity as a colostomy bag. Gotta have a lot of material to post on ECCIE.



Fixed! Originally Posted by herfacechair

Wow! I have to hand it to ya. It took some dedication to break that shit down into nearly syllables. Not that anything you said was new or impressive. You tend to repeat shit. Its always the same jargon and buzzwords. I will admit you did add a layer of depth to your online persona. I had once said you sound like a retard doing a Stephen Hawking impression. Now you seem to have combined it with someone with asthma. Kind of like this. Hi...my...name...is...H...F... C...I..am..a...smart...mo..the r...fu..cker..Es...corts...pay ..me..cause...I...am...so...go od...

Leave it to the liberals to resort to grammar police mode to make up for the fact that they've constantly gotten crushed in the actual debate. How soon they resort to it is one, of many, visible, observable, measures of the desperation they feel. Originally Posted by herfacechair

If you could recognize a liberal it would be a miracle .
That would be a stretch for you lemmings.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: His face chair

Insult fail. In BDSM, a name that starts with a lowercase letter represents a submissive's name. A dominant's name is capitalized. The way you present it here, the "face chair" belongs to the dominant, not to the submissive. I take a submissive, to the woman, role, hence, "herfacechair." My face is "her" chair. Got it "brain"?

But, we non-lemmings know that you follow feelings and emotions, and just follow the crowd like what the lemmings are claimed to do, right into the water.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: could not even understand the cartoon.

Anybody that could read English generated in a way that a fifth grader would understand it would know that I understood the cartoon. I've lost count of how many times I've referred to your side of the argument as "lemmings". I've been doing that since arguing against liberals 13 years ago.

You've done nothing but repeat liberal talking points. Did this when I hammered you under your older username, you're doing this now. The others that I have argued against have also done this. No sign of critical thought, independent thinking, independent analysis, or any of that. Simply repeat the talking points from your liberal taskmasters, as well as the liberal talking points from the other liberals on this message board and elsewhere.

You guys consistently argue an erroneous argument. You do so because your sources of information are erroneous, but you guys don't care. You simply "fall off the cliff" with your erroneous sources of information, whether that be your information sources or others in your side of the argument.

If you look at my reply, you would notice that I effectively use the cartoon against you. In fact, it says "Democratic Primaries", in short, in the sign. That cartoon is consistent, with who to direct the lemming labeled to, with the arguments I have advanced over 13 years.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: It is why he is begging for a dick to suck.

My allies have destroyed you, year in and year out, since the first time I destroyed you on this message board. It shows. Not only do you lack originality, but you are parroting insults rather than coming up with your own. Don't mistake that reflection in the mirror, that you're talking to here, as me. We all know that you are begging for a dick to suck, and are extremely excited to join the rest of ECCIE Dutch Rudder Gang at the H-E-B parking lot.

Perhaps when you do meet up with your Dutch rudder crew, you can find out if your "own vacation" hero is using his false military claims to get discounts given the proximity of the nearest military base to that HEB.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: You can always tell a lemming,

Says the guy that has a hard time seeing the fact that he is simply one of the liberal lemmings, of which there are many. My allies, on this message board, have knocked you on your ass so hard that you are left repeating yourself like a broken record. Perhaps if they keep this up, you are going to one day be found in the corner of your room, sitting in a fetal position, sucking your thumb to improve your dick sucking skills, constantly saying "lemming," with glazed eyes and drool flowing from your lips.

I'ma begging for dick, aka Ekim: you just can't tell them much..

You're proof that this is false. You've expressed so much of what isn't the case, proving the effectiveness of the propaganda campaign of the Democratic Party's propaganda machine, the mainstream media. My current MOS involves psychological operations/warfare. One of the things that we do is enemy counter propaganda. Your responses, as well as that of those that I have argued against here and elsewhere, are what we call positive impact indicators. These are measurements of the effectiveness of the enemy's propaganda efforts. In this case, the effectiveness of the mainstream media's propaganda efforts. You've spoken a mouthful, proving that lemmings can be told a lot.



Fixed to reflect reality. Originally Posted by herfacechair

Wrong again shit for brains, but you get an F for effort.

If you could recognize a liberal it would be a miracle .
That would be a stretch for you lemmings. Originally Posted by bamscram

Those Conservative cocksuckers continually start the grammar shit and half the time its just a typo or they are just plain wrong anyway.