Tucker Carlson reports

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5...e-blm-movement

Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager who was acquitted of murder last week after shooting and killing two people in Kenosha, Wis., during civil unrest there last year, said he supports the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement.

"I’m not a racist person. I support the BLM movement," Rittenhouse said during an interview with Fox News host Tucker Carlson, a portion of which is slated to air on Carlson's program on Monday evening.

"I support peacefully demonstrating," the teen told Carlson, according to a transcript of the interview. "I believe there needs to be change. I believe there’s a lot of prosecutorial misconduct, not just in my case but in other cases. It’s just amazing to see how much a prosecutor can take advantage of someone."

[url]. I believe there’s a lot of prosecutorial misconduct, not just in my case but in other cases. It’s just amazing to see how much a prosecutor can take advantage of someone." Originally Posted by Tiny

He is not wrong about that...but that is how our "Justice " system has always been and I'd venture to guess how it will always be.

He was lucky in the fact that he could afford the best lawyers...two mock trials from which to gain insight.

How many defendants would you say are able to afford top notch lawyers? Mock trials...

The only thing I really wonder is why the prosecutors even bothered to charge the kid with a gun charge if it is legal for a 17 year old to walk the streets with an AR. Shouldn't they know the law in their state? I just assumed it was illegal for an untrained teenager to be walking around with that kind of weapon. I obviously assumed wrong.

Anyway, it sounds like a pretty fucked up and archaic law to me but whatever, the law is the law so if he didn't break it, so be it.

I don't think Salty was being a smart ass about his question to me. I just don't share his ideologies and that's okay. He's pretty much always been civil towards me so he's good in my book. But I can't really answer his question thoughtfully although I gave an answer. It is just something that would never happen to me because I would never put myself in that situation.
I would never willingly or knowingly walk towards fires, I purposely run away from them because I'm not trying to be a fireman and act like I know what I'm doing when I don't.

Oh, and fuck the Cowboys. That's 3 wasted hours of my life that I'll never get back. I can't believe those sorry motherfuckers suckered me into believing in them again. I don't know why I keep falling for the same okie-doke gut punch every season. LOL Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

LM - in response to your first sentence question - a simple answer
The Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse was politically motivated, enabled, and executed.

The DPST party directed/caused the prosecution - in complete disregard to teh Rule of Equality for All under teh rule of law.

This is teh subverted DOJ under fiden/garland.

This is the 'justice' demanded by DPST mis-guided and misled 'protestors' - who are armed, have intent to kill - and are not charged with the same crimes Kyle rittenho0use was charged with.
it is the DPST party enabling this double standard of justice , and its' hypocrisy and denial which enables such miscarriage of justice and Rule of law.

and DPST lemmings - just nod and think - Oh, isn't that Nice"!! - response to their Xinn and msnbc lying talking heads



So - Until they come for You - DPST lemmings.



Buck fiden
From my cold dead hands!

LM - in response to your first sentence question - a simple answer
The Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse was politically motivated, enabled, and executed.

The DPST party directed/caused the prosecution - in complete disregard to teh Rule of Equality for All under teh rule of law.

This is teh subverted DOJ under fiden/garland.

s! Originally Posted by oeb11

Rittenhouse was prosecuted by the DOJ?

Wow, who knew.

Thanks oeb for that tidbit of information.

For those who protest the jury decision of teh rittenhouse trial:
' A picture is worth 1,000 words'

Brandon wants the dojj to look into the case , The outcome although just doesn't fit the narrative You know burning down cities in peaceful riots okay , self defense NO ...

... Blimey! ... Would you look at that. Thanks to our mate Waco
and the magic of (Al Gore's) internets - YOU can surely see
and hear Rittenhouse (and Tucker) right here.

### Salty

He was lucky in the fact that he could afford the best lawyers... Originally Posted by WTF

Wrong!

He couldn't afford a change of underwear, let alone the "best lawyers". He was a fucking 17-year-old lifeguard. He rotted in jail for 3 months while his (sleazy and eventually fired/replaced) lawyers Lin Wood and John Pierce did crowd-funding to pay themselves and meet bail.

Nowadays, any broke idiot who becomes a cause celebre - with either the left or the right - can do crowd-funding to "afford the best lawyers".

Rittenhouse was prosecuted by the DOJ?

Wow, who knew.

Thanks oeb for that tidbit of information. Originally Posted by WTF

if you say so


House judiciary chair calls for DOJ to review Kyle Rittenhouse verdict: ‘A miscarriage of justice’

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1961147.html

The LSM is still trying to push some crazy narrative ,,,

Quote - wtf
Originally Posted by WTF
Rittenhouse was prosecuted by the DOJ?

Wow, who knew.

Thanks oeb for that tidbit of information.

Answer - i did not write that Kyle rittenhouse was prosecuted by teh DOJ.


This what i wrote - a criticism of teh politicization of teh prosecution of rittenhouse by the Media, DPST party narrative/ideology, and abetted by garland's DOJ which will file New federal criminal charges - under nadler and garland.

They will prosecute Kyle rittenhouse again - as a sacrificial lamb for their marxist, racist ideology - and amid DPST claims that Kyle was racially motivated - despite teh FACT that the four involved are all white
That matters not to race-baiters like sharpton, reid. Jesse jackson, and teh fiden cabal. and promulgated by Liars of teh DPST LSM propagnda arm.


Buck fiden
From my cold dead hands

WTF - If you wish to quote me - do so accurately

Please stop Lying.

and please do not be a race-baiter like your DPST party LSM and nomenklatura.

He is not wrong about that...but that is how our "Justice " system has always been and I'd venture to guess how it will always be.

He was lucky in the fact that he could afford the best lawyers...two mock trials from which to gain insight.

How many defendants would you say are able to afford top notch lawyers? Mock trials... Originally Posted by WTF

... Actually, Rittenhouse must have been reading our
forums here and THIS actual post - 'cause HE ADDRESSED
that very point at the interview. People need to have
the money $$$ to hire the best barristers.

Now the Rittenhouse bloke didn't give a shout-out
to Me - or to me bludger-mate WTF, but he DID
cover this topic.

But good for WTF to mention the point - so the
Rittenhouse joey could address it.

### Salty

From your precious yahoo news.



Tucker Carlson cited a graph with wrong numbers to try to argue that women outnumber men in the US workforce, which they do not


https://news.yahoo.com/tucker-carlso...110314237.html

The y-axis showing women's participation in the workforce should have started at 30% and ended at 65%, because women's workforce participation bottomed out at 30% in the 1950s and has not gone above 61% since.

Instead it used the same scale as the male participation graph, making the data wildly incorrect. The error was first reported by The Daily Beast.

Fox News did not immediately respond to a request for comment.