BAT SHIT CRAZY TO ANOTHER LEVEL- ECCIE2NDAVE- MAKE IT RIGHT FOR EVELYN CRUZ -PROVIDERS PLEASE BE AWARE OF THIS LUNATIC

Mexicans come from Honduras?

Mexicans come from Honduras? Originally Posted by essence

No.....Honduras come through Mexico.

Mexicans come from Honduras? Originally Posted by essence

Mexicans come from everywhere..........duuuhhh

But, you bring up an excellent point.............do all the illiterate mescan spa whores get the exception.......carkido wants to know.

Not one Mod has provided any information as to what the minimum information required to be supplied by the reviewer or person reviewed to validate a review . Therefore, then yes, everything is subjective and they must make the requirements, aka exceptions, different for each case.

They are running with the "I know it when I see it" bit in their mouth.

You literate whores should be offended at the double standard.

Sorry folks. Been out of town and catching up. And for those of you who do not know, I do not live in or visit the Houston area. So no pussy in the game here........ Originally Posted by Pistolero

.....like with the local mods.

Not one Mod has provided any information as to what the minimum information required to be supplied by the reviewer or person reviewed to validate a review . Therefore, then yes, everything is subjective and they must make the requirements, aka exceptions, different for each case. Originally Posted by gtoman

gtoman,

Here are the GLs in play.........

#11 - Review "Quacking" , a term which describes openly proclaiming falsehood in reply to a review, will be strongly discouraged by our staff. If you believe a review to be false, use the RTM function to report it to your local staff.

#24 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.

This is what Spice, PistolPete, SMI and DeD are hanging their modtard hat on to allow Natalia to handle Evelyn Cruz's account and post the afore mentioned rebuttal.........

Some verified providers may have a "helper" This is defined as someone who you are allowing to access your account to post your ad on a weekly basis. This is fine at ECCIE Worldwide, however we do require that you request approval from staff prior to allowing someone this access. This will be approved on a case-by-case basis. In any case where you request a male member to assist you with your ad, conditional approval may be given and your settings/usergroup adjusted to disable access to the female-only forums. This is especially important, since you would be placing your account access in jeopardy by allowing another party to access your account without prior staff approval.

As you can see, the modtards fucked it up from the beginning........wait, let me go look in modtardville where it is documented that Natalia sought and received permission to act as Evelyn Cruz's "helper" what with her being illiterate and all.............nope, don't see it.

At what point does this go from being a "hobby" to an "obsession"

Welcome back Pete... lock thread yet anyone? The "on topic" has been concluded. All that is happening now is pissing and moaning.

Locking it would be icing on the cake........."you post it you own it".........for everyone except Natalia..........heh

There is enough gold in this hill to last the rest of the year.

Mexicans come from everywhere..........duuuhhh

But, you bring up an excellent point.............do all the illiterate mescan spa whores get the exception.......carkido wants to know. Originally Posted by dearhunter

Only if they are ethnic mexicans.

Only if they are ethnic mexicans. Originally Posted by essence

seems kinda racist

It'll be something if agency handlers start rebutting "NO" reviews on their girls.

It'll be something if agency handlers start rebutting "NO" reviews on their girls. Originally Posted by hornfreak

They can only be rebutting the illiterate ones..........wait...........w asn't Natalia with an agency back when she was illiterate?

... lock thread yet anyone? . Originally Posted by Mythos

Oh hell no. This is not medical speculation, but at least 2 members would have apoplexy strokes if we did that. From extreme glee. Right DH and Wu.

Not one Mod has provided any information as to what the minimum information required to be supplied by the reviewer or person reviewed to validate a review . Therefore, then yes, everything is subjective and they must make the requirements, aka exceptions, different for each case. Originally Posted by gtoman

Have you noticed that there are few rules but many guidelines on the board? The answer to your question is simple, but yet not. You have to supply info which shows that the review is true. It could be just one item. It make take 20 smaller items which add to the whole. As you said, each case is different.

.......

Welcome back Pete... lock thread yet anyone? The "on topic" has been concluded. All that is happening now is pissing and moaning. Originally Posted by Mythos

That's the pussy way out.

Which means mods are waiting for.......