1. Posey should fill the slot position. This has to be his year or he's probably done. He has shown flashes but that Achilles injury really hurt him.
2. I wondered about the demise of the running back as well. There are still good backs but, yeah, they don't seem to last as long. I think it's mostly due to the size and speed of defensive players.
3. When I think of durable running backs I think Tony Dorsett, Earl Campbell, Walter Payton, Emmit Smith. Those guys would put a lick on someone but it was usually a defensive back.
3. With players getting bigger and quicker on defense it really makes the field smaller which in turn puts an emphasis on getting the ball downfield with accurate passing.
4. The game is always evolving but I don't see the cycle going back to 3 yards and a cloud of dust.
Originally Posted by boardman
1. I concur. The guy still has the jets, but seems to be leery of cutting. He could be fully healed and never get injured again, but the memory of that injury has a lasting impact.
When I first saw him, I thought we'd finally gotten someone good enough to keep up with Andre, but alas, so far, no joy.
2. I don't think so. You remember a fella they used to call 'The Fridge'? They grew 'em big back then, too - and it was a little more wild west on PEDs and the like.
I'm still hung up on the idea that it was the FBs who ended up taking the brutal hits while the RBs got to skate away like water bugs....I don't know, maybe my memory is playing tricks on me.
3. Smith I recall very well. He was good, but don't be fooled - the defenses had to pick their poison and either get chewed up piece by piece by Emmitt, or give up massive chunks to Aikman et al through the air. Quality QBs make life easier for RBs, and quality RBs make life easier for QBs - like hobbyist and provider, it's a mutually beneficial relationship.
4. Hey, with the NFL, as long as they don't up game day roster sizes, you are always going to be forced to specialize. In general, you can be average everywhere, or good in two things, or excellent at one thing; you simply don't have the cap room and the roster spots to be excellent at everything.
If everyone is paying money to be excellent at covering the pass, that means they almost have to be cutting corners somewhere else, right?
Additional food for thought: Peterson, Charles and Lynch seem to be consistently excellent - what are they doing differently? Do they run single back sets, or are they going with two in the backfield?