For those who need proof of election fraud....

Horse manure.

... Executive Order would be one way to ensure Voter ID
for Federal Elections --- maybe President Trump will do it.

Or would you rather see Election Fraud exposed in Arizona,
Michigan and of course EXPOSED EVEN FURTHER in Georgia...

... For those who need MORE proof of Election Fraud - I surely hope
you'll keep reading..

##### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Executive Order == Federal Toilet Paper

Again, can you produce *ANY* court document that clearly states *FRAUD* on it. (Had to use the biggy print because it seems you haven't seen it in the past... Repeatedly not seen.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ort-outsiders/

Calling the Republican Party under Trump the “America First movement,” Moore told Breitbart News’s Matthew Boyle that the “Democrats’ only play is to go hard left and then allow illegals, people who are not citizens, to vote because American citizens don’t want what they’re trying to shove down our throats.”

Two points
- If there are these vast numbers of these 'illegals voting' (presumably enough to influence elections), why has no one yet been able to produce evidence of it?
- The SAVE Act does not require re-registration of existing voters...thereby leaving these 'voting illegals' on the voter rolls for at least a couple of election cycles.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ort-outsiders/

Calling the Republican Party under Trump the “America First movement,” Moore told Breitbart News’s Matthew Boyle that the “Democrats’ only play is to go hard left and then allow illegals, people who are not citizens, to vote because American citizens don’t want what they’re trying to shove down our throats.”

Two points
- If there are these vast numbers of these 'illegals voting' (presumably enough to influence elections), why has no one yet been able to produce evidence of it?
- The SAVE Act does not require re-registration of existing voters...thereby leaving these 'voting illegals' on the voter rolls for at least a couple of election cycles.

state Rep. Pam Altendorf hints at voter fraud, but it doesn't hold up under inspection.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/minnes...ng-information


https://x.com/PamAltendorf/status/20...l-integrity%2F

Top level summary of just a few things I’ve found on the Hennepin County Voter List:

▶️7779 - Challenged Voters
▶️2992 - Voters with Missing Data
▶️79 - Voters Check ID status
▶️503 - Voters that are 100 YO or OVER
▶️21.6% - Voters in one precinct in Ilhan Omar’s District are CHALLENGED
▶️16 - Voters missing birth dates
AND MUCH MORE!!!!
Thanks
@lizcollin
for reporting! I hope the #MNmedia has the integrity to also report on these highly concerning findings.

First, just for grins...quantify the problem
823,435 registered voters in Hennepin County MN. Pam says 2,992 voters that have missing information....0.36%

Let's look at some reasons for those numbers.
https://alphanews.org/exclusive-we-n...ntegrity/?utm_

The Secretary of State’s Office has acknowledged this issue in the past, telling Alpha News that:
“Minnesota state law did not require voters who registered before 1983 to provide their date of birth. When the state moved to a digital voter registration system, the birth year of 1900 was added as a placeholder. Over the years, the majority of those who were grandfathered into the digital system with the 1900 birthdate have been updated. However, if a voter has not changed their address or name since they registered and consistently voted, they would not have an updated birthdate recorded.”

he statement went on to say that “challenges indicate that election judges are verifying eligibility in real time.”
According to the spokesperson, address verification is a routine reason a voter record may be flagged as challenged, “including when a registration confirmation postcard is returned as undeliverable.”

“All voters that have been challenged will need to work with election judges to resolve the challenge prior to being issued a ballot. Individuals who do not meet eligibility requirements under a challenge are not allowed to vote, in accordance with Minnesota law,”

state Rep. Pam Altendorf hints at voter fraud, but it doesn't hold up under inspection.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/minnes...ng-information


https://x.com/PamAltendorf/status/20...l-integrity%2F

Top level summary of just a few things I’ve found on the Hennepin County Voter List:

▶️7779 - Challenged Voters
▶️2992 - Voters with Missing Data
▶️79 - Voters Check ID status
▶️503 - Voters that are 100 YO or OVER
▶️21.6% - Voters in one precinct in Ilhan Omar’s District are CHALLENGED
▶️16 - Voters missing birth dates
AND MUCH MORE!!!!
Thanks
@lizcollin
for reporting! I hope the #MNmedia has the integrity to also report on these highly concerning findings.

First, just for grins...quantify the problem
823,435 registered voters in Hennepin County MN. Pam says 2,992 voters that have missing information....0.36%

Let's look at some reasons for those numbers.
https://alphanews.org/exclusive-we-n...ntegrity/?utm_

The Secretary of State’s Office has acknowledged this issue in the past, telling Alpha News that:
“Minnesota state law did not require voters who registered before 1983 to provide their date of birth. When the state moved to a digital voter registration system, the birth year of 1900 was added as a placeholder. Over the years, the majority of those who were grandfathered into the digital system with the 1900 birthdate have been updated. However, if a voter has not changed their address or name since they registered and consistently voted, they would not have an updated birthdate recorded.”

he statement went on to say that “challenges indicate that election judges are verifying eligibility in real time.”
According to the spokesperson, address verification is a routine reason a voter record may be flagged as challenged, “including when a registration confirmation postcard is returned as undeliverable.”

“All voters that have been challenged will need to work with election judges to resolve the challenge prior to being issued a ballot. Individuals who do not meet eligibility requirements under a challenge are not allowed to vote, in accordance with Minnesota law,”

... Executive Order would be one way to ensure Voter ID
for Federal Elections --- maybe President Trump will do it.

Or would you rather see Election Fraud exposed in Arizona,
Michigan and of course EXPOSED EVEN FURTHER in Georgia...
Originally Posted by Salty Again

Horse manure. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Executive Order == Federal Toilet Paper

Again, can you produce *ANY* court document that clearly states *FRAUD* on it. (Had to use the biggy print because it seems you haven't seen it in the past... Repeatedly not seen. Originally Posted by Precious_b

While he may try it, an Executive Order here won't do shit.

The Constitution specifically says the STATES are in control of this. Briny denials...and repeated nonsensical lies...won't change that.

And there ain't no fraud in Arizona...other than that being perpetrated by Trump loyalist taintlickers looking to further his goal of undermining election integrity.

.

double post

... Oh Blimey! ... NOW there's Election Fraud Investigations
all-about the land... Arizona, Michigan, and now in California!

... Crikey! ... I surely created a Monster! ...

OH YEAH...and they're 'highly professional' investigations, too.

Take this for example.
Noem visited Arizona to complain about elections and push the SAVE act.

Nearly an hour after the press conference was scheduled to begin, Noem stepped behind a lectern in a large conference room and spoke about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, more commonly known as the SAVE Act, and urged Congress to pass it. She also mentioned she had met with some Arizona officials to discuss elections.

Noem was flanked by poster boards discussing voter ID requirements being pushed by the SAVE Act, however, Arizona already requires proof of citizenship in order to register to vote as well as voter ID requirements.

She called Arizona’s elections an “absolute disaster” and made the false claim that there is widespread voter fraud by illegal immigrants. But when pressed by reporters to provide examples, Noem could not provide even a single one.

“Oh, I’m sure there’s many of them,” she responded.

Convincing proof if I've ever heard it. That'll get you an indictment and a conviction 'every' time....

https://azmirror.com/2026/02/13/kris...arizona-visit/

Duplicate

But I'll plug in Heritage Database list of Arizona voting fraud...
https://electionfraud.heritage.org/search?state=az

40 cases since 1982...7 cases of ineligible voting, 0 cases of ineligible voting by alien...'widespread fraud'<snort>


Michigan?
19 total since 1982...1 ineligible voting

California?
71 cases since 1982...5 ineligible voting...2 ineligible voting by alien

... I surely created a Monster! ... Originally Posted by Salty Again

You created nothing except a continual patter of non-stop, unquestioning support of these lies and the liars making them. And despite repeated challenges, you never post any credible evidence that supports these lies.

.

You created nothing except a continual patter of non-stop, unquestioning support of these lies and the liars making them. And despite repeated challenges, you never post any credible evidence that supports these lies.

. Originally Posted by rooster

Can you imagine your life being so devoid of meaning that you have to resort to self-congratulatory political posts on a hooker board?

Can you imagine your life being so devoid of meaning that you have to resort to self-congratulatory political posts on a hooker board? Originally Posted by TechPapi

It may force one to even create imaginary playmates..."insiders"

.

FOUND IT! North Carolina!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem...-id-stay-rolls

Republican National Committee had sued claiming 250,000 voters were improperly registered.
Republicans had requested that the voters be removed from rolls and their votes in the 2024 elections be thrown out.

Oh, hold on a minute...turns out they aren't illegal immigrants voting...The voters in question did not provide the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers or an attestation that they had neither on their registrations.

T

he North Carolina State Board of Elections admitted that roughly 100,000 voters lacked proper identification as of last summer. As of December, that number had shrunk to roughly 73,000.

Monday's agreement allows those voters to stay on the voter rolls, with their information to be updated when they cast a ballot. North Carolina law requires voters to show ID when voting.

Damn, I know that voter fraud and illegal immigrant voting is around here someplace....maybe if I look behind that unicorn over there.