nothing reply anything you want

But if Biden nominated him, you would have called him a "DEI hire."

But if Biden nominated him, you would have called him a "DEI hire."

But if Biden nominated him, you would have called him a "DEI hire." Originally Posted by brasil

I disagree brasil. I don’t see him as a DEI hire at all. And wouldn’t have said that if Biden nominated him. But, we all know Biden would have never nominated him, so it’s a mute point honestly.

I disagree brasil. I don’t see him as a DEI hire at all. And wouldn’t have said that if Biden nominated him. But, we all know Biden would have never nominated him, so it’s a mute point honestly. Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR

He was hired for the same reason all of Trumps cabinet was…..loyalty to Trump, not to the Constitution.

The same thing happened in 1930’s Germany. The parallel is there.

He was hired for the same reason all of Trumps cabinet was…..loyalty to Trump, not to the Constitution.

The same thing happened in 1930’s Germany. The parallel is there. Originally Posted by elghund

And Biden’s hires weren’t? Although, I’ll give you this. Biden had virtually nothing to do with his hires. The Bureaucracy in Biden’s Admin were doing the hiring and were loyal to said Bureaucracy, and obviously not the Constitution (ie. The wide open border allowing illegals to enter our country by the millions, the majority of which are dangerous and hate our country, not to mention….it’s fucking illegal). Biden was nothing but a puppet with dementia.

Btw, the Nazi parallel argument is wearing thin. Libs have been using it for 10+ years now and it isn’t working. Trump was re-elected, the same ole talking points didn’t work before and aren’t gonna work now.

Gonna be a long 4 years for you haters. Especially after you’ve been proven wrong. But, admitting you were wrong will be for a whole other discussion no?

Checked the illegal border encounter numbers recently? Down well over 90% and dropping. But, Biden, Harris & Mayorkas kept telling us the border was secure and there was nothing they can do about it without Congressional help. How’s that argument working out for ya after the fact?

Do you ever actually read what you post?

Seriously.

The most serious question I have ever asked on here.

Because you are making statements that do not help refute the "Nazi parallel argument" or give you a lot of legitimacy when you are calling others "haters."

Let's look at this one bit a little closer:

"...The wide open border allowing illegals to enter our country by the millions, the majority of which are dangerous and hate our country....

Really? Millions of illegals. And the majority of them are dangerous? And hate us?

Could someone say that sounds racist? Or hateful? Millions of people? Most of them dangerous? Most of them hate our country?

I know that this is just a small snippet of your post. And the colored font is my emphasis. But I don't think that I have changed the meaning.

So.... would it maybe (just asking) be a bit more accurate to say that the majority of them don't hate us and don't want to hurt us?

That they might be here just because it sucks a lot less than where they were?

And one would think, if that's the case, that they might be kind of glad to be here and don't want to hurt anyone because of that. For selfish reasons, if nothing else.

I'm not questioning the legality or "right" of them to be here. I'm just questioning what kind of message it is that you post claiming that millions of people who chose to come here hate us and want to hurt us.

Some might question who you mean when you call out "haters."

But maybe there is more "irony" here that I missed.

I very much look forward to anyone game enough to post an alternate understanding.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not a joke.

And if the brilliant detectives here manage to take me out, I go in true peace.

I know it's a hooker board. But some of this isn't right.