Comey should have been fired on day one, https://youtu.be/wbkS26PX4rc Originally Posted by goodolboyObama should have fired him when Comey threw SOP out the window and began saying anything one way or the other about even the existence of any investigation.
Now people think it's because he is trying to hide something. Originally Posted by greanOh, no, no, no.....not people. Only the whiny, hateful left and their self-loathing, incestuous bed-buddies in the media.
So...if ALL of that is true (as the Trump-hating left says it is)...WHY is it the FBI (and any of the other intel agencies in our country) that are chock-full of highly qualified, intelligent, savvy, well-trained professionals...and they cannot come up with ANY of the evidence that is being required to pin even ONE allegation (ie: of collusion...or any other crime) directly on Donnie's flabby little potus chest?Its early. When you read FBI investigation reports, 302's, etc., they move very, very slowly. They think of it as being meticulous, but it's a situation encouraged by Federal prosecutors who only want cases that are the equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel. You get most Assistant USA's in a tough fight with a decent trial lawyer (never mind a really good one), they're like a soft turd in a hard rain. See the recent John Wylie Price case. They got beat like a rented mule.
Originally Posted by Chateau Becot
("almost any jackass could be deemed a successful President.") As seen for the last 8 years. Curious, do you think the Feds had no case against Hillary and Huma? Originally Posted by goodolboyI have no idea even what the argument is for a case against Huma. Stupidity in marrying Weiner and not me??!!
I have no idea even what the argument is for a case against Huma. Stupidity in marrying Weiner and not me??!!I don't think her maid had classified security clearance. "As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government emails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, emails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material."
As for Hillary, not, not even close. You have to prove that she "knowingly and willfully" "disclosed" classified information to an inappropriate person. No way in hell you can prove that. She hired a computer security gut to secure the server. There is no evidence that it was disclosed to any outside person in any even. And when the machine was sent to the forensics company, her attorney promptly told them to keep the emails on the system, an instruction that the forensics company botched. What on earth would you claim, even in layman's terms, that she did wrong that would amount to intentionally disclosing classified secrets to other people? Originally Posted by TexTushHog
I don't think her maid had classified security clearance. "As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government emails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, emails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material."I don't think printing out is necessarily "disclosure". And how would that government prove beyond a reasonable doubt which ones the maid printed out. There were only a small hand full that were classified at the time that she received them. I think for it to be disclosure, the maid would have to read them.
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton...ied-materials/ Originally Posted by goodolboy
("I have no idea even what the argument is for a case against Huma. Stupidity in marrying Weiner and not me??!!Turns out, that allegation is largely untrue as I understand what Comey's correction the other day said. Turns out there were very few emails and none of them were classified, if I understand correctly. And many, many were in there because that's where her personal digital devices were backed up, and not forwarded manually, therefore negating intent.![]()
In regards to Huma my understanding is she forwarded classified material to her husband Weiner's laptop. Mr Carlos danger does not have a security clearance and his personal laptop is not a secure place for classified material.
" emails found on Weiner’s laptop had been forwarded from Clinton deputy Huma Abedin to Weiner, her husband, not hundreds or thousands as Comey had stated. The FBI said just two of those messages contained classified information."
I am not aware of a "intent" clause" when it comes to mis handling classified material. Regardless of that I believe they had evidence if intent. I thought Gowdy explained it pretty well. https://youtu.be/ChgcYHISvTM Originally Posted by goodolboy